Serena A Rodriguez1, Robin T Higashi, Andrea C Betts2, Cynthia Ortiz1, Jasmin A Tiro, Amneris E Luque, Arti Barnes3. 1. Department of Population & Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 2. University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health, Dallas, TX. 3. Department of Infectious Diseases, Yale School of Medicine and Cornell Scott Hill Health Center, New Haven, CT.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were (1) to describe anal cancer knowledge, perceived risk, screening barriers, and acceptability of sample self-collection among women living with HIV (WLWH) at an integrated safety-net system and (2) to describe differences in demographic and psychosocial variables among a subsample of WLWH with a history of abnormal cervical cytology results versus those with normal results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted telephone surveys with English- and Spanish-speaking WLWH (N = 99) and used electronic health record data to extract insurance type, CD4+ cell count, RNA viral load, and cervical cytology results. We calculated descriptive statistics for participant demographics, HIV laboratory results, and psychosocial variables. Among the subsample of women who completed a recent cervical Pap, we used Fisher exact test to assess differences in demographic variables, CD4+ counts, RNA viral loads, knowledge, awareness, acceptability, and perceived risk by cervical cytology results. RESULTS: Most participants (70%) reported knowing nothing about anal cancer; 28% correctly responded that HIV increases one's chance of getting anal cancer. Most (68%) never heard of an anal Pap test. Forty percent would get an anal Pap if they could self-collect the sample, whereas 59% were neutral or disagreed. The 2 most commonly cited barriers to obtaining an anal Pap were "I do not know enough about it" (n = 15) and "It might hurt" (n = 9). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a gap in knowledge and awareness among WLWH regarding their heightened risk for anal cancer. It indicates the need for health education and suggests an opportunity for a self-collection intervention.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were (1) to describe anal cancer knowledge, perceived risk, screening barriers, and acceptability of sample self-collection among women living with HIV (WLWH) at an integrated safety-net system and (2) to describe differences in demographic and psychosocial variables among a subsample of WLWH with a history of abnormal cervical cytology results versus those with normal results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted telephone surveys with English- and Spanish-speaking WLWH (N = 99) and used electronic health record data to extract insurance type, CD4+ cell count, RNA viral load, and cervical cytology results. We calculated descriptive statistics for participant demographics, HIV laboratory results, and psychosocial variables. Among the subsample of women who completed a recent cervical Pap, we used Fisher exact test to assess differences in demographic variables, CD4+ counts, RNA viral loads, knowledge, awareness, acceptability, and perceived risk by cervical cytology results. RESULTS: Most participants (70%) reported knowing nothing about anal cancer; 28% correctly responded that HIV increases one's chance of getting anal cancer. Most (68%) never heard of an anal Pap test. Forty percent would get an anal Pap if they could self-collect the sample, whereas 59% were neutral or disagreed. The 2 most commonly cited barriers to obtaining an anal Pap were "I do not know enough about it" (n = 15) and "It might hurt" (n = 9). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a gap in knowledge and awareness among WLWH regarding their heightened risk for anal cancer. It indicates the need for health education and suggests an opportunity for a self-collection intervention.
Authors: Seyram A Butame; Sylvia Lawler; Joseph T Hicks; J Michael Wilkerson; Lu-Yu Hwang; Sarah Baraniuk; Michael W Ross; Elizabeth Yu Chiao; Alan G Nyitray Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Vivian Colón-López; Meredith S Shiels; Mark Machin; Ana P Ortiz; Howard Strickler; Philip E Castle; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Eric A Engels Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-11-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael J Silverberg; Bryan Lau; Chad J Achenbach; Yuezhou Jing; Keri N Althoff; Gypsyamber D'Souza; Eric A Engels; Nancy A Hessol; John T Brooks; Ann N Burchell; M John Gill; James J Goedert; Robert Hogg; Michael A Horberg; Gregory D Kirk; Mari M Kitahata; Philip T Korthuis; William C Mathews; Angel Mayor; Sharada P Modur; Sonia Napravnik; Richard M Novak; Pragna Patel; Anita R Rachlis; Timothy R Sterling; James H Willig; Amy C Justice; Richard D Moore; Robert Dubrow Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Teresa M Darragh; J Michael Berry-Lawhorn; Jennifer M Roberts; Michelle J Khan; Lori A Boardman; Elizabeth Chiao; Mark H Einstein; Stephen E Goldstone; Naomi Jay; Wendy M Likes; Elizabeth A Stier; Mark L Welton; Dorothy J Wiley; Joel M Palefsky Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Tracy A Battaglia; Christine M Gunn; Molly E McCoy; Helen H Mu; Amy S Baranoski; Elizabeth Y Chiao; Lisa A Kachnic; Elizabeth A Stier Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2015-08-04
Authors: Jessica Wells; Lisa Flowers; C Christina Mehta; Rasheeta Chandler; Robert Knott; Marcia McDonnell Holstad; Deborah Watkins Bruner Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 5.944
Authors: Robin T Higashi; Serena A Rodriguez; Andrea C Betts; Jasmin A Tiro; Amneris E Luque; Rachel Rivera; Arti Barnes Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2021-02-17