BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients commonly have abnormalities in cerebral white matter that are visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as hyperintensities (WMHs). Visual rating scales (VRSs) have been used to quantify WMH in other diseases such as cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD), but not in HIV. Such scales are advantageous because they are applicable to routinely acquired MRIs and so are suitable for large-scale studies and clinical care. We sought to establish the utility of three VRSs (the Fazekas, Scheltens, and van Sweiten scales) in HIV. METHODS: The Manhattan HIV Brain Bank (MHBB) is a longitudinal cohort study that performs serial neurologic examinations and neuropsychological testing. All brain MRIs (n = 73) performed for clinical purposes on MHBB participants were scored using the three VRSs. We assessed reliability, validity, and correlation of the VRS with clinical factors relevant to HIV and CSVD. RESULTS: The VRSs all showed acceptable internal consistency and interrater reliability and were highly correlated with one another (r = 0.836-0.916, P < .001). The Fazekas and Scheltens scales demonstrated more WMH in periventricular regions, and the Scheltens scale also suggested a frontal to occipital gradient, with greater WMH frontally. All three VRSs correlated significantly with cognitive impairment (global T score). Age and hepatitis C virus antibody serostatus were the strongest clinical/demographic correlates of WMH, followed by African-American race. CONCLUSIONS: VRSs reliably quantify WMH in HIV-infected individuals and correlate with cognitive impairment. Future studies may find routinely acquired brain MRI quantified by VRS to be an accessible and meaningful neurologic outcome measure in HIV.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infectedpatients commonly have abnormalities in cerebral white matter that are visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as hyperintensities (WMHs). Visual rating scales (VRSs) have been used to quantify WMH in other diseases such as cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD), but not in HIV. Such scales are advantageous because they are applicable to routinely acquired MRIs and so are suitable for large-scale studies and clinical care. We sought to establish the utility of three VRSs (the Fazekas, Scheltens, and van Sweiten scales) in HIV. METHODS: The Manhattan HIV Brain Bank (MHBB) is a longitudinal cohort study that performs serial neurologic examinations and neuropsychological testing. All brain MRIs (n = 73) performed for clinical purposes on MHBBparticipants were scored using the three VRSs. We assessed reliability, validity, and correlation of the VRS with clinical factors relevant to HIV and CSVD. RESULTS: The VRSs all showed acceptable internal consistency and interrater reliability and were highly correlated with one another (r = 0.836-0.916, P < .001). The Fazekas and Scheltens scales demonstrated more WMH in periventricular regions, and the Scheltens scale also suggested a frontal to occipital gradient, with greater WMH frontally. All three VRSs correlated significantly with cognitive impairment (global T score). Age and hepatitis C virus antibody serostatus were the strongest clinical/demographic correlates of WMH, followed by African-American race. CONCLUSIONS: VRSs reliably quantify WMH in HIV-infected individuals and correlate with cognitive impairment. Future studies may find routinely acquired brain MRI quantified by VRS to be an accessible and meaningful neurologic outcome measure in HIV.
Authors: Paul A Nyquist; Murat S Bilgel; Rebecca Gottesman; Lisa R Yanek; Taryn F Moy; Lewis C Becker; Jennifer Cuzzocreo; Jerry Prince; David M Yousem; Diane M Becker; Brian G Kral; Dhananjay Vaidya Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Nicola Moscufo; Charles R G Guttmann; Dominik Meier; Istvan Csapo; Peter G Hildenbrand; Brian C Healy; Julia A Schmidt; Leslie Wolfson Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2009-05-09 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Christa Watson; Edgar Busovaca; Jessica M Foley; I Elaine Allen; Christopher G Schwarz; Neda Jahanshad; Talia M Nir; Pardis Esmaeili-Firidouni; Benedetta Milanini; Howard Rosen; Owen T Carmichael; Paul M Thompson; Victor G Valcour Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 2.643
Authors: Pauline Maillard; Evan Fletcher; Samuel N Lockhart; Alexandra E Roach; Bruce Reed; Dan Mungas; Charles DeCarli; Owen T Carmichael Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jacqueline J J Zheng; Kim Delbaere; Jacqueline C T Close; Perminder Sachdev; Wei Wen; Henry Brodaty; Stephen R Lord Journal: Gerontology Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 5.140
Authors: Eva M Müller-Oehring; Tilman Schulte; Margaret J Rosenbloom; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Edith V Sullivan Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Jose Gutierrez; Tiffany N Porras; Moka Yoo-Jeong; Farid Khasiyev; Kay C Igwe; Krystal K Laing; Adam M Brickman; Marykay Pavol; Rebecca Schnall Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 3.771
Authors: Yair Mina; Tianxia Wu; Hsing-Chuan Hsieh; Dima A Hammoud; Swati Shah; Chuen-Yen Lau; Lillian Ham; Joseph Snow; Elizabeth Horne; Anuradha Ganesan; Stanley I Rapoport; Edmund C Tramont; Daniel S Reich; Brian K Agan; Avindra Nath; Bryan R Smith Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: C Bernard; B Dilharreguy; H Font; A Ndoye Diop; J M Tine; I Cissé Diakhate; M Seydi; J F Dartigues; F Dabis; G Catheline; F Bonnet Journal: Int J Infect Dis Date: 2020-12-10 Impact factor: 3.623