Uraina S Clark1, Evan R Miller2, Rachal R Hegde2. 1. Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. Electronic address: uraina.clark@mssm.edu. 2. Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social discrimination, a type of psychological stressor, is associated with poorer physical and mental health outcomes, yet we have little understanding of how discrimination affects neural functions in marginalized populations. By contrast, the effects of psychological stress on neural functions are well documented, with evidence of significant effects on the amygdala-a neural region that is central to psychosocial functions. Accordingly, we conducted an examination of the relation between self-reported discrimination exposure and amygdala activity in a diverse sample of adults. METHODS: Seventy-four adults (43% women; 72% African American; 23% Hispanic; 32% homosexual/bisexual) completed self-report ratings of discrimination exposure. Spontaneous amygdala activity and functional connectivity were assessed during resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Greater discrimination exposure was associated with higher levels of spontaneous amygdala activity. Increases in discrimination were also associated with stronger functional connectivity between the amygdala and several neural regions (e.g., anterior insula, putamen, caudate, anterior cingulate, medial frontal gyrus), with the most robust effects observed in the thalamus. These effects were independent of several demographic (e.g., race, ethnicity, sex) and psychological (e.g., current stress, depression, anxiety) factors. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our findings provide the first evidence that social discrimination is independently associated with elevations in intrinsic amygdala activity and functional connectivity, thus revealing clear parallels between the neural substrates of discrimination and psychological stressors of other origins. Such results should spur future investigations of amygdala-based networks as potential etiological factors linking discrimination exposure to adverse physical and mental health outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Social discrimination, a type of psychological stressor, is associated with poorer physical and mental health outcomes, yet we have little understanding of how discrimination affects neural functions in marginalized populations. By contrast, the effects of psychological stress on neural functions are well documented, with evidence of significant effects on the amygdala-a neural region that is central to psychosocial functions. Accordingly, we conducted an examination of the relation between self-reported discrimination exposure and amygdala activity in a diverse sample of adults. METHODS: Seventy-four adults (43% women; 72% African American; 23% Hispanic; 32% homosexual/bisexual) completed self-report ratings of discrimination exposure. Spontaneous amygdala activity and functional connectivity were assessed during resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Greater discrimination exposure was associated with higher levels of spontaneous amygdala activity. Increases in discrimination were also associated with stronger functional connectivity between the amygdala and several neural regions (e.g., anterior insula, putamen, caudate, anterior cingulate, medial frontal gyrus), with the most robust effects observed in the thalamus. These effects were independent of several demographic (e.g., race, ethnicity, sex) and psychological (e.g., current stress, depression, anxiety) factors. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our findings provide the first evidence that social discrimination is independently associated with elevations in intrinsic amygdala activity and functional connectivity, thus revealing clear parallels between the neural substrates of discrimination and psychological stressors of other origins. Such results should spur future investigations of amygdala-based networks as potential etiological factors linking discrimination exposure to adverse physical and mental health outcomes.
Authors: Tené T Lewis; Susan A Everson-Rose; Lynda H Powell; Karen A Matthews; Charlotte Brown; Kelly Karavolos; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Elizabeth Jacobs; Deidre Wesley Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2006 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Uraina S Clark; Ronald A Cohen; Michelle L Westbrook; Kathryn N Devlin; Karen T Tashima Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Rebecca K Sripada; Anthony P King; Robert C Welsh; Sarah N Garfinkel; Xin Wang; Chandra S Sripada; Israel Liberzon Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2012-10-31 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Esther Beraha; Jonathan Eggers; Catherine Hindi Attar; Stefan Gutwinski; Florian Schlagenhauf; Meline Stoy; Philipp Sterzer; Thorsten Kienast; Andreas Heinz; Felix Bermpohl Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Cheshire Hardcastle; Hanna K Hausman; Jessica N Kraft; Alejandro Albizu; Nicole D Evangelista; Emanuel M Boutzoukas; Andrew O'Shea; Kailey Langer; Emily Van Van Etten; Pradyumna K Bharadwaj; Hyun Song; Samantha G Smith; Eric Porges; Steven T DeKosky; Georg A Hishaw; Samuel S Wu; Michael Marsiske; Ronald Cohen; Gene E Alexander; Adam J Woods Journal: Geroscience Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 7.713
Authors: Negar Fani; Leyla Eghbalzad; Nathaniel G Harnett; Sierra E Carter; Matthew Price; Jennifer S Stevens; Kerry J Ressler; Sanne J H van Rooij; Bekh Bradley Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2022-09-13 Impact factor: 8.294
Authors: S Duke Han; Melissa Lamar; Debra Fleischman; Namhee Kim; David A Bennett; Tené T Lewis; Konstantinos Arfanakis; Lisa L Barnes Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2021-08 Impact factor: 3.224