Pauline Maillard1, Evan Fletcher1, Samuel N Lockhart1, Alexandra E Roach1, Bruce Reed1, Dan Mungas1, Charles DeCarli1, Owen T Carmichael2. 1. From the Imaging of Dementia and Aging Laboratory (P.M., E.F., S.N.L., A.E.R., B.R., D.M., C.D., O.T.C.), Department of Neurology (P.M., E.F., B.R., D.M., C.D., O.T.C.), and Center for Neuroscience (S.N.L., A.E.R., C.D.), University of California, Davis. 2. From the Imaging of Dementia and Aging Laboratory (P.M., E.F., S.N.L., A.E.R., B.R., D.M., C.D., O.T.C.), Department of Neurology (P.M., E.F., B.R., D.M., C.D., O.T.C.), and Center for Neuroscience (S.N.L., A.E.R., C.D.), University of California, Davis. ocarmichael@ucdavis.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Aging is accompanied by clinically silent cerebral white matter injury identified through white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)- and diffusion tensor imaging-based measures of white matter integrity. The temporal course of FLAIR and diffusion tensor imaging changes within WMHs and their less-injured periphery (ie, their penumbra), however, has not been fully studied. We used longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging and FLAIR to explore these changes. METHODS: One hundred fifteen participants, aged 73.7±6.7 years, received clinical evaluations and MRIs on 2 dates. WMHs and fractional anisotropy (FA) maps were produced from FLAIR and diffusion tensor imaging and coregistered to a standardized space. Each distinct WMH was categorized as growing, stagnant, or noncontiguous incident. The penumbra of each WMH was similarly categorized as corresponding to a stagnant, growing, or noncontiguous incident WMH. Linear mixed-effect models were used to assess whether FA and FLAIR measurements changed between baseline and follow-up and differed between tissue categories. RESULTS: Baseline FA differed significantly by tissue category, with the following ordering of categories from highest to lowest FA: penumbra of noncontiguous incident, then stagnant, then growing WMHs; noncontiguous incident, then stagnant, then growing WMHs. Despite differences in baseline values, all tissue categories experienced declines in FA over time. Only noncontiguous incident WMHs showed significant FLAIR signal increases over time, and FLAIR signal significantly decreased in stagnant WMHs. CONCLUSIONS: WMHs and their penumbra vary in severity and together span a continuous spectrum of white matter injury that worsens with time. FLAIR fails to capture this continuous injury process fully but does identify a subclass of lesions that seem to improve over time.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Aging is accompanied by clinically silent cerebral white matter injury identified through white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)- and diffusion tensor imaging-based measures of white matter integrity. The temporal course of FLAIR and diffusion tensor imaging changes within WMHs and their less-injured periphery (ie, their penumbra), however, has not been fully studied. We used longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging and FLAIR to explore these changes. METHODS: One hundred fifteen participants, aged 73.7±6.7 years, received clinical evaluations and MRIs on 2 dates. WMHs and fractional anisotropy (FA) maps were produced from FLAIR and diffusion tensor imaging and coregistered to a standardized space. Each distinct WMH was categorized as growing, stagnant, or noncontiguous incident. The penumbra of each WMH was similarly categorized as corresponding to a stagnant, growing, or noncontiguous incident WMH. Linear mixed-effect models were used to assess whether FA and FLAIR measurements changed between baseline and follow-up and differed between tissue categories. RESULTS: Baseline FA differed significantly by tissue category, with the following ordering of categories from highest to lowest FA: penumbra of noncontiguous incident, then stagnant, then growing WMHs; noncontiguous incident, then stagnant, then growing WMHs. Despite differences in baseline values, all tissue categories experienced declines in FA over time. Only noncontiguous incident WMHs showed significant FLAIR signal increases over time, and FLAIR signal significantly decreased in stagnant WMHs. CONCLUSIONS: WMHs and their penumbra vary in severity and together span a continuous spectrum of white matter injury that worsens with time. FLAIR fails to capture this continuous injury process fully but does identify a subclass of lesions that seem to improve over time.
Authors: P Kochunov; J L Lancaster; P Thompson; R Woods; J Mazziotta; J Hardies; P Fox Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2001 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: A Spilt; R Goekoop; R G J Westendorp; G J Blauw; A J M de Craen; M A van Buchem Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Marius de Groot; Benjamin F J Verhaaren; Renske de Boer; Stefan Klein; Albert Hofman; Aad van der Lugt; M Arfan Ikram; Wiro J Niessen; Meike W Vernooij Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: M Yoshita; E Fletcher; D Harvey; M Ortega; O Martinez; D M Mungas; B R Reed; C S DeCarli Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-12-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Charles DeCarli; Joseph Massaro; Danielle Harvey; John Hald; Mats Tullberg; Rhoda Au; Alexa Beiser; Ralph D'Agostino; Philip A Wolf Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: D Y Lee; E Fletcher; O Martinez; M Ortega; N Zozulya; J Kim; J Tran; M Buonocore; O Carmichael; C DeCarli Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Tom Jeerakathil; Philip A Wolf; Alexa Beiser; Joseph Massaro; Sudha Seshadri; Ralph B D'Agostino; Charles DeCarli Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-06-24 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Julia A Scott; Meredith N Braskie; Duygu Tosun; Pauline Maillard; Paul M Thompson; Michael Weiner; Charles DeCarli; Owen T Carmichael Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Christa Watson; Edgar Busovaca; Jessica M Foley; I Elaine Allen; Christopher G Schwarz; Neda Jahanshad; Talia M Nir; Pardis Esmaeili-Firidouni; Benedetta Milanini; Howard Rosen; Owen T Carmichael; Paul M Thompson; Victor G Valcour Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 2.643
Authors: Pauline Maillard; Gary F Mitchell; Jayandra J Himali; Alexa Beiser; Evan Fletcher; Connie W Tsao; Matthew P Pase; Claudia L Satizabal; Ramachandran S Vasan; Sudha Seshadri; Charles DeCarli Journal: Stroke Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: William Reginold; Kevin Sam; Julien Poublanc; Joe Fisher; Adrian Crawley; David J Mikulis Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Matthew P Pase; Jayandra J Himali; Gary F Mitchell; Alexa Beiser; Pauline Maillard; Connie Tsao; Martin G Larson; Charles DeCarli; Ramachandran S Vasan; Sudha Seshadri Journal: Hypertension Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Takashi Tarumi; Daan L K de Jong; David C Zhu; Benjamin Y Tseng; Jie Liu; Candace Hill; Jonathan Riley; Kyle B Womack; Diana R Kerwin; Hanzhang Lu; C Munro Cullum; Rong Zhang Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-01-24 Impact factor: 6.556