| Literature DB >> 28833572 |
Margaret E Cooke1, Amira I Hussein1, Kyle E Lybrand1, Alexander Wulff1, Erin Simmons1, Jeffrey H Choi1, Jody Litrenta1, William M Ricci2, Jason W Nascone3, Robert V O'Toole3, Elise F Morgan4, Louis C Gerstenfeld1, Paul Tornetta1.
Abstract
Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (RUST) and modified RUST (mRUST) are radiographic tools for quantitatively evaluating fracture healing using a cortical scoring system. This tool has high intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs); however, little evidence has evaluated the scores against the physical properties of bone healing. Closed, stabilized fractures were made in the femora of C3H/HeJ male mice (8-12 week-old) of two dietary groups: A control and a phosphate restricted diet group. Micro-computed tomography (µCT) and torsion testing were carried out at post-operative days (POD) 14, 21, 35, and 42 (n = 10-16) per group time-point. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographic views were constructed from the µCT scans and scored by five raters. The raters also indicated if the fracture were healed. ICCs were 0.71 (mRUST) and 0.63 (RUST). Both RUST scores were positively correlated with callus bone mineral density (BMD) (r = 0.85 and 0.80, p < 0.001) and bone volume fraction (BV/TV) (r = 0.86 and 0.80, p < 0.001). Both RUST scores positively correlated with callus strength (r = 0.35 and 0.26, p < 0.012) and rigidity (r = 0.50 and 0.39, p < 0.001). Radiographically healed calluses had a mRUST ≥13 and a RUST ≥10 and had excellent relationship to structural and biomechanical metrics. Effect of delayed healing due to phosphate dietary restrictions was found at later time points with all mechanical properties (p < 0.011), however no differences found in the RUST scores (p > 0.318). Clinical relevance of this study is both RUST scores showed high correlation to physical properties of healing and generally distinguished healed vs. non-healed fractures.Entities:
Keywords: biomechanics; fracture; microCT; radiological union scores
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28833572 PMCID: PMC5823715 DOI: 10.1002/jor.23710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Res ISSN: 0736-0266 Impact factor: 3.494