Literature DB >> 22453081

Micro-computed tomography assessment of the progression of fracture healing in mice.

Kevin R O'Neill1, Christopher M Stutz, Nicholas A Mignemi, Michael C Burns, Matthew R Murry, Jeffry S Nyman, Jonathan G Schoenecker.   

Abstract

The mouse fracture model is ideal for research into the pathways of healing because of the availability of genetic and transgenic mice and the ability to create cell-specific genetic mutations. While biomechanical tests and histology are available to assess callus integrity and tissue differentiation, respectively, micro-computed tomography (μCT) analysis has increasingly been utilized in fracture studies because it is non-destructive and provides descriptions of the structural and compositional properties of the callus. However, the dynamic changes of μCT properties that occur during healing are not well defined. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine which μCT properties change with the progression of fracture repair and converge to values similar to unfractured bone in the mouse femur fracture model. A unilateral femur fracture was performed in C57BL/6 mice and intramedullary fixation performed. Fractured and un-fractured contralateral specimens were harvested from groups of mice between 2 and 12 weeks post-fracture. Parameters describing callus based on μCT were obtained, including polar moment of inertia (J), bending moment of inertia (I), total volume (TV), tissue mineral density (TMD), total bone volume fraction (BV/TV), and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD). For comparison, plain radiographs were used to measure the callus diameter (D) and area (A); and biomechanical properties were evaluated using either three-point bending or torsion. The μCT parameters J, I, TV, and TMD converged toward their respective values of the un-fractured femurs over time, although significant differences existed between the two sides at every time point evaluated (p<0.05). Radiograph measurement D changed with repair progression in similar manner to TV. In contrast, BV/TV and BMD increased and decreased over time with statistical differences between callus and un-fractured bone occurring sporadically. Similarly, none of the biomechanical properties were found to distinguish consistently between the fractured and un-fractured femur. Micro-CT parameters assessing callus structure and size (J, I, and TV) were more sensitive to changes in callus over time post-fracture than those assessing callus substance (TMD, BV/TV, and BMD). Sample size estimates based on these results indicate that utilization of μCT requires fewer animals than biomechanics and thus is more practical for evaluating the healing femur in the mouse fracture model.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22453081     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  37 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative phenotyping of bone fracture repair: a review.

Authors:  Michele Casanova; Aaron Schindeler; David Little; Ralph Müller; Philipp Schneider
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2014-07-30

2.  Correlation between RUST assessments of fracture healing to structural and biomechanical properties.

Authors:  Margaret E Cooke; Amira I Hussein; Kyle E Lybrand; Alexander Wulff; Erin Simmons; Jeffrey H Choi; Jody Litrenta; William M Ricci; Jason W Nascone; Robert V O'Toole; Elise F Morgan; Louis C Gerstenfeld; Paul Tornetta
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Suppression of Notch Signaling in Osteoclasts Improves Bone Regeneration and Healing.

Authors:  Peeyush N Goel; Yasaman Moharrer; John H Hebb; Alexander J Egol; Gurpreet Kaur; Kurt D Hankenson; Jaimo Ahn; Jason W Ashley
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Temporary inhibition of the plasminogen activator inhibits periosteal chondrogenesis and promotes periosteal osteogenesis during appendicular bone fracture healing.

Authors:  D Bravo; A M Josephson; V Bradaschia-Correa; M Z Wong; N L Yim; S S Neibart; S N Lee; J Huo; T Coughlin; M M Mizrahi; P Leucht
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  A simple critical-sized femoral defect model in mice.

Authors:  Bret H Clough; Matthew R McCarley; Carl A Gregory
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Bone regeneration with osteogenically enhanced mesenchymal stem cells and their extracellular matrix proteins.

Authors:  Bret H Clough; Matthew R McCarley; Ulf Krause; Suzanne Zeitouni; Jeremiah J Froese; Eoin P McNeill; Christopher D Chaput; H Wayne Sampson; Carl A Gregory
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73) regulates bone formation and remodeling during intramembranous bone repair in aging mice.

Authors:  Vivian Bradaschia-Correa; Anne M Josephson; Alexander J Egol; Matthew M Mizrahi; Kevin Leclerc; Jason Huo; Bruce N Cronstein; Philipp Leucht
Journal:  Tissue Cell       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 2.466

8.  Fracture healing in mice lacking Pten in osteoblasts: a micro-computed tomography image-based analysis of the mechanical properties of the femur.

Authors:  Caitlyn J Collins; Juan F Vivanco; Scott A Sokn; Bart O Williams; Travis A Burgers; Heidi-Lynn Ploeg
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Changes of mesenchymal stromal cells mobilization and bone turnover in an experimental bone fracture model in ovariectomized mice.

Authors:  Jian Pang; Hai-Ling Guo; Dao-Fang Ding; Yu-Yun Wu; Yong-Fang Zhao; Xin-Feng Gu; Yu-Xin Zheng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01

10.  Fibrinolysis is essential for fracture repair and prevention of heterotopic ossification.

Authors:  Masato Yuasa; Nicholas A Mignemi; Jeffry S Nyman; Craig L Duvall; Herbert S Schwartz; Atsushi Okawa; Toshitaka Yoshii; Gourab Bhattacharjee; Chenguang Zhao; Jesse E Bible; William T Obremskey; Matthew J Flick; Jay L Degen; Joey V Barnett; Justin M M Cates; Jonathan G Schoenecker
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.