Literature DB >> 28832334

Beyond the margin recipe: the probability of correct target dosage and tumor control in the presence of a dose limiting structure.

Marnix G Witte1, Jan-Jakob Sonke, Jeffrey Siebers, Joseph O Deasy, Marcel van Herk.   

Abstract

In the past, hypothetical spherical target volumes and ideally conformal dose distributions were analyzed to establish the safety of planning target volume (PTV) margins. In this work we extended these models to estimate how alternative methods of shaping dose distributions could lead to clinical improvements. Based on a spherical clinical target volume (CTV) and Gaussian distributions of systematic and random geometrical uncertainties, idealized 3D dose distributions were optimized to exhibit specific stochastic properties. A nearby spherical organ at risk (OAR) was introduced to explore the benefit of non-spherical dose distributions. Optimizing for the same minimum dose safety criterion as implied by the generally accepted use of a PTV, the extent of the high dose region in one direction could be reduced by half provided that dose in other directions is sufficiently compensated. Further reduction of this unilateral dosimetric margin decreased the target dose confidence, however the actual minimum CTV dose at 90% confidence typically exceeded the minimum PTV dose by 20% of prescription. Incorporation of smooth dose-effect relations within the optimization led to more concentrated dose distributions compared to the use of a PTV, with an improved balance between the probability of tumor cell kill and the risk of geometrical miss, and lower dose to surrounding tissues. Tumor control rate improvements in excess of 20% were found to be common for equal integral dose, while at the same time evading a nearby OAR. These results were robust against uncertainties in dose-effect relations and target heterogeneity, and did not depend on 'shoulders' or 'horns' in the dose distributions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28832334      PMCID: PMC5796411          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa87fe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  20 in total

1.  Tumour control probability: a formulation applicable to any temporal protocol of dose delivery.

Authors:  M Zaider; G N Minerbo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Inclusion of geometric uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation.

Authors:  Marcel van Herk; Peter Remeijer; Joos V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Quantifying the position and steepness of radiation dose-response curves.

Authors:  S M Bentzen; S L Tucker
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  The Price of Target Dose Uniformity.

Authors:  David Craft; Fazal Khan; Michael Young; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Probabilistic objective functions for margin-less IMRT planning.

Authors:  Román Bohoslavsky; Marnix G Witte; Tomas M Janssen; Marcel van Herk
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The scenario-based generalization of radiation therapy margins.

Authors:  Albin Fredriksson; Rasmus Bokrantz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Robust treatment planning for intensity modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer based on coverage probabilities.

Authors:  Christoph Baum; Markus Alber; Mattias Birkner; Fridtjof Nüsslin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Optimal radiation beam profiles considering uncertainties in beam patient alignment.

Authors:  B K Lind; P Källman; B Sundelin; A Brahme
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.089

9.  A model for calculating tumour control probability in radiotherapy including the effects of inhomogeneous distributions of dose and clonogenic cell density.

Authors:  S Webb; A E Nahum
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Modelling the interplay between hypoxia and proliferation in radiotherapy tumour response.

Authors:  J Jeong; K I Shoghi; J O Deasy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  3 in total

1.  Dose escalation in the definite target volume.

Authors:  W Tyler Watkins; Hamidreza Nourzadeh; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evaluation of OAR dose sparing and plan robustness of beam-specific PTV in lung cancer IMRT treatment.

Authors:  Yu Chang; Feng Xiao; Hong Quan; Zhiyong Yang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Novel adaptive beam-dependent margins for additional OAR sparing.

Authors:  H S Tsang; C P Kamerling; P Ziegenhein; S Nill; U Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.609

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.