BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate an optimization approach where coverage probabilities are incorporated into the optimization of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to overcome the problem of margin definition in the case of overlapping planning target volume and organs at risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IMRT plans were generated for three optimization approaches: based on a planning CT plus margin (A), on prostate and rectum contours from five pre-treatment CT plus margin (B), and on coverage probabilities (C). For approach (C), the probability of organ occupation was computed for each voxel from five pre-treatment CTs and the population distribution of systematic setup error and it was used as local weight in the costfunctions. Monte Carlo simulations of treatment courses were used to compute the probability distribution of prostate and rectal wall equivalent uniform dose (EUD). RESULTS: Treatment simulations showed best and most robust results for prostate and rectal wall EUD within the population for (C). For (A) the rectal wall EUD was on average about 1.5 Gy greater than in (C), while the prostate EUD was lower than those from (C) for most of the patients for (B) (especially for those with great organ motion). CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of coverage probabilities as local weights allows for dose escalation as well as improved rectal sparing and results in a safer and more robust IMRT treatment.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate an optimization approach where coverage probabilities are incorporated into the optimization of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to overcome the problem of margin definition in the case of overlapping planning target volume and organs at risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IMRT plans were generated for three optimization approaches: based on a planning CT plus margin (A), on prostate and rectum contours from five pre-treatment CT plus margin (B), and on coverage probabilities (C). For approach (C), the probability of organ occupation was computed for each voxel from five pre-treatment CTs and the population distribution of systematic setup error and it was used as local weight in the costfunctions. Monte Carlo simulations of treatment courses were used to compute the probability distribution of prostate and rectal wall equivalent uniform dose (EUD). RESULTS: Treatment simulations showed best and most robust results for prostate and rectal wall EUD within the population for (C). For (A) the rectal wall EUD was on average about 1.5 Gy greater than in (C), while the prostate EUD was lower than those from (C) for most of the patients for (B) (especially for those with great organ motion). CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of coverage probabilities as local weights allows for dose escalation as well as improved rectal sparing and results in a safer and more robust IMRT treatment.
Authors: Adam D Yock; Radhe Mohan; Stella Flampouri; Walter Bosch; Paige A Taylor; David Gladstone; Siyong Kim; Jason Sohn; Robert Wallace; Ying Xiao; Jeff Buchsbaum Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-12-15
Authors: Marnix G Witte; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Jeffrey Siebers; Joseph O Deasy; Marcel van Herk Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Wei Liu; Samir H Patel; Jiajian Jason Shen; Yanle Hu; Daniel P Harrington; Xiaoning Ding; Michele Y Halyard; Steven E Schild; William W Wong; Gary A Ezzell; Martin Bues Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2016-02-13