| Literature DB >> 28832158 |
Sangyeon Pak1, Juwon Lee1, Young-Woo Lee1, A-Rang Jang1,2, Seongjoon Ahn2, Kyung Yeol Ma2, Yuljae Cho1, John Hong1, Sanghyo Lee1, Hu Young Jeong3, Hyunsik Im4, Hyeon Suk Shin2, Stephen M Morris1, SeungNam Cha1, Jung Inn Sohn1, Jong Min Kim5.
Abstract
van der Waals heterostructures composed of two different monolayer crystals have recently attracted attention as a powerful and versatile platform for studying fundamental physics, as well as having great potential in future functional devices because of the diversity in the band alignments and the unique interlayer coupling that occurs at the heterojunction interface. However, despite these attractive features, a fundamental understanding of the underlying physics accounting for the effect of interlayer coupling on the interactions between electrons, photons, and phonons in the stacked heterobilayer is still lacking. Here, we demonstrate a detailed analysis of the strain-dependent excitonic behavior of an epitaxially grown MoS2/WS2 vertical heterostructure under uniaxial tensile and compressive strain that enables the interlayer interactions to be modulated along with the electronic band structure. We find that the strain-modulated interlayer coupling directly affects the characteristic combined vibrational and excitonic properties of each monolayer in the heterobilayer. It is further revealed that the relative photoluminescence intensity ratio of WS2 to MoS2 in our heterobilayer increases monotonically with tensile strain and decreases with compressive strain. We attribute the strain-dependent emission behavior of the heterobilayer to the modulation of the band structure for each monolayer, which is dictated by the alterations in the band gap transitions. These findings present an important pathway toward designing heterostructures and flexible devices.Entities:
Keywords: MoS2/WS2; band gap transition; interlayer interactions; strain engineering; van der Waals heterostructures
Year: 2017 PMID: 28832158 PMCID: PMC5959243 DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02513
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nano Lett ISSN: 1530-6984 Impact factor: 11.189
Figure 1Synthesis and characterization of a MoS2/WS2 heterobilayer. (a) A schematic representation of a CVD grown MoS2/WS2 heterobilayer with WS2 grown on top of MoS2. (b) An optical image of the CVD grown heterobilayer on a 300 nm SiO2 substrate. Note that WS2 is grown on top of MoS2, which can be distinguished from the distinct optical contrast in the colors for the different layers. Scale bar: 10 μm. (c) An AFM topography image of the CVD grown heterobilayer. The thickness of monolayer WS2 and MoS2 is extracted to be 0.8 and 0.7 nm, respectively, from the height profile (inset) at the vertical step edge of a MoS2/WS2 heterobilayer and MoS2/SiO2, which confirms the formation of the MoS2/WS2 heterobilayer. Scale bar: 3 μm. (d) Raman spectra of the heterobilayer (red curve) and individual monolayers of MoS2 and WS2. For a MoS2/WS2 heterobilayer, the Raman characteristic peaks of each monolayer appear to coexist. (e) PL spectra taken from the heterobilayer (red curve). The PL intensity of the heterobilayer is noticeably decreased compared to that recorded for individual monolayers of MoS2 and WS2.
Figure 2Characteristic phonon vibrational modes of the MoS2/WS2 heterobilayer under tensile and compressive strain. (a) A schematic of our bending system used to strain the heterobilayer and measure the vibrational phonon modes. (b) Evolution of the Raman spectra as the heterobilayer is strained from 0% to +0.70% (toward red, tensile) and −0.70% (toward blue, compressive). The change in the Raman in-plane E12g phonon modes of WS2 (c) and MoS2 (d) in the heterobilayer under uniaxial tensile (red) and compressive (blue) strain.
Figure 3Strain-dependent emission properties of the MoS2/WS2 heterobilayer. (a) Evolution of the PL spectra as the heterobilayer is strained from 0% (black) to +0.7% (toward red, tensile) and −0.7% (toward blue, compressive). Strain-dependent PL peak position of coupled MoS2 and WS2 in the heterobilayer under uniaxial (b) tensile and (c) compressive strain.
Figure 4Variation in the PL intensity in the heterobilayer and a schematic representation of the band structure under strain. The dependence of the WS2 to MoS2 PL intensity ratio in the heterobilayer under (a) tensile and (b) compressive strains. The intensity ratio is monotonically increased and decreased under tensile and compressive strain, respectively. A schematic representation showing the contrasting trends of the evolution of electronic band structure in monolayers of MoS2 and WS2 under (c) tensile (red) and (d) compressive (blue) strain. “direct” and “indirect” represent the direct semiconducting characteristic and direct to indirect transition, respectively.