José Baselga1, Claudio Zamagni2, Patricia Gómez3, Begoña Bermejo4, Shigenori E Nagai5, Bohuslav Melichar6, Arlene Chan7, Lászlo Mángel8, Jonas Bergh9, Frederico Costa10, Henry L Gómez11, William J Gradishar12, Clifford A Hudis13, Bernardo L Rapoport14, Henri Roché15, Patricia Maeda16, Liping Huang16, Gerold Meinhardt16, Joshua Zhang16, Lee S Schwartzberg17. 1. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: baselgaj@mskcc.org. 2. S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy. 3. Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain. 5. Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan. 6. Palacky University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic. 7. Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. 8. University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary. 9. Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. 10. Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil. 11. Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru. 12. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. 13. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. 14. The Medical Oncology Center of Rosebank and Linksfield Park Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa. 15. Institut Claudius Régaud, Toulouse, France. 16. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, NJ. 17. The West Clinic, Memphis, TN.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic/antiproliferative activity. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, we assessed first- or second-line capecitabine with sorafenib or placebo in patients with locally advanced/metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer resistant to a taxane and anthracycline and with known estrogen/progesterone receptor status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 537 patients were randomized to capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice per day for days 1 to 14 every 21 days with oral sorafenib 600 mg/d or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients were stratified according to hormone receptor status, previous chemotherapies for metastatic breast cancer, and geographic region. RESULTS: Treatment with sorafenib with capecitabine, compared with capecitabine with placebo, did not prolong median PFS (5.5 vs. 5.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.973; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.779-1.217; P = .811) or overall survival (OS; 18.9 vs. 20.3 months; HR, 1.195; 95% CI, 0.943-1.513; P = .140); or enhance overall response rate (ORR; 13.5% vs. 15.5%; P = .515). Any grade toxicities (sorafenib vs. placebo) included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES; 79.2% vs. 59.6%), diarrhea (47.3% vs. 37.8%), mucosal inflammation (15.4% vs. 6.7%), and hypertension (26.2% vs. 5.6%). Grade 3/4 toxicities included PPES (15.4% vs. 7.1%), diarrhea (4.2% vs. 6.4%), and vomiting (3.5% vs. 0.7%). CONCLUSION: The combination of sorafenib with capecitabine did not improve PFS, OS, or ORR in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Rates of Grade 3 toxicities were higher in the sorafenib arm.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION:Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic/antiproliferative activity. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, we assessed first- or second-line capecitabine with sorafenib or placebo in patients with locally advanced/metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer resistant to a taxane and anthracycline and with known estrogen/progesterone receptor status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 537 patients were randomized to capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice per day for days 1 to 14 every 21 days with oral sorafenib 600 mg/d or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients were stratified according to hormone receptor status, previous chemotherapies for metastatic breast cancer, and geographic region. RESULTS: Treatment with sorafenib with capecitabine, compared with capecitabine with placebo, did not prolong median PFS (5.5 vs. 5.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.973; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.779-1.217; P = .811) or overall survival (OS; 18.9 vs. 20.3 months; HR, 1.195; 95% CI, 0.943-1.513; P = .140); or enhance overall response rate (ORR; 13.5% vs. 15.5%; P = .515). Any grade toxicities (sorafenib vs. placebo) included palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES; 79.2% vs. 59.6%), diarrhea (47.3% vs. 37.8%), mucosal inflammation (15.4% vs. 6.7%), and hypertension (26.2% vs. 5.6%). Grade 3/4 toxicities included PPES (15.4% vs. 7.1%), diarrhea (4.2% vs. 6.4%), and vomiting (3.5% vs. 0.7%). CONCLUSION: The combination of sorafenib with capecitabine did not improve PFS, OS, or ORR in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Rates of Grade 3 toxicities were higher in the sorafenib arm.
Authors: Kathleen J Yost; Susan E Yount; David T Eton; Cheryl Silberman; Anne Broughton-Heyes; David Cella Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Ann H Partridge; R Bryan Rumble; Lisa A Carey; Steven E Come; Nancy E Davidson; Angelo Di Leo; Julie Gralow; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Beverly Moy; Douglas Yee; Shelley B Brundage; Michael A Danso; Maggie Wilcox; Ian E Smith Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-09-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Piccart; G N Hortobagyi; M Campone; K I Pritchard; F Lebrun; Y Ito; S Noguchi; A Perez; H S Rugo; I Deleu; H A Burris; L Provencher; P Neven; M Gnant; M Shtivelband; C Wu; J Fan; W Feng; T Taran; J Baselga Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Kathy D Miller; Linnea I Chap; Frankie A Holmes; Melody A Cobleigh; P Kelly Marcom; Louis Fehrenbacher; Maura Dickler; Beth A Overmoyer; James D Reimann; Amy P Sing; Virginia Langmuir; Hope S Rugo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: José Baselga; José Getúlio Martins Segalla; Henri Roché; Auro Del Giglio; Hélio Pinczowski; Eva M Ciruelos; Sebastião Cabral Filho; Patricia Gómez; Brigitte Van Eyll; Begoña Bermejo; Antonio Llombart; Bernardo Garicochea; Miguel Ángel Climent Durán; Paulo Marcelo Gehm Hoff; Marc Espié; Andre Augusto Junior Gemeinder de Moraes; Ronaldo Albuquerque Ribeiro; Clarissa Mathias; Miguel Gil Gil; Belén Ojeda; Josefa Morales; Sunhee Kwon Ro; Shell Li; Frederico Costa Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-03-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David W Miles; Arlene Chan; Luc Y Dirix; Javier Cortés; Xavier Pivot; Piotr Tomczak; Thierry Delozier; Joo Hyuk Sohn; Louise Provencher; Fabio Puglisi; Nadia Harbeck; Guenther G Steger; Andreas Schneeweiss; Andrew M Wardley; Andreas Chlistalla; Gilles Romieu Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-05-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Scott M Wilhelm; Christopher Carter; Liya Tang; Dean Wilkie; Angela McNabola; Hong Rong; Charles Chen; Xiaomei Zhang; Patrick Vincent; Mark McHugh; Yichen Cao; Jaleel Shujath; Susan Gawlak; Deepa Eveleigh; Bruce Rowley; Li Liu; Lila Adnane; Mark Lynch; Daniel Auclair; Ian Taylor; Rich Gedrich; Andrei Voznesensky; Bernd Riedl; Leonard E Post; Gideon Bollag; Pamela A Trail Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: Linda T Vahdat; Rachel Layman; Denise A Yardley; William Gradishar; Mohamad A Salkeni; Anil Joy; Agustin A Garcia; Patrick Ward; James Khatcheressian; Joseph Sparano; Gladys Rodriguez; Shande Tang; Ling Gao; Rita P Dalal; John Kauh; Kathy Miller Journal: Oncologist Date: 2017-02-20
Authors: M Martín; S Loibl; T Hyslop; J De la Haba-Rodríguez; B Aktas; C T Cirrincione; K Mehta; W T Barry; S Morales; L A Carey; J A Garcia-Saenz; A Partridge; N Martinez-Jañez; O Hahn; E Winer; A Guerrero-Zotano; C Hudis; M Casas; C Rodriguez-Martin; J Furlanetto; E Carrasco; M N Dickler Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 9.162