| Literature DB >> 31276981 |
M Martín1, S Loibl2, T Hyslop3, J De la Haba-Rodríguez4, B Aktas5, C T Cirrincione3, K Mehta2, W T Barry6, S Morales7, L A Carey8, J A Garcia-Saenz9, A Partridge10, N Martinez-Jañez11, O Hahn12, E Winer10, A Guerrero-Zotano13, C Hudis14, M Casas15, C Rodriguez-Martin15, J Furlanetto2, E Carrasco15, M N Dickler16.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Randomised trials comparing the efficacy of standard endocrine therapy (ET) versus experimental ET + bevacizumab (Bev) in 1st line hormone receptor-positive patients with metastatic breast cancer have thus far shown conflicting results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We pooled data from two similar phase III randomised trials of ET ± Bev (LEA and Cancer and Leukemia Group B 40503) to increase precision in estimating treatment effect. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and safety. Exploratory analyses were performed within subgroups defined by patients with recurrent disease, de novo disease, prior endocrine sensitivity or resistance and reported grades III-IV hypertension and proteinuria.Entities:
Keywords: Advanced breast cancer; Bevacizumab; Endocrine therapy; Pooled-analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31276981 PMCID: PMC6718694 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.06.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Cancer ISSN: 0959-8049 Impact factor: 9.162