Literature DB >> 31276981

Evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis from the LEA (GEICAM/2006-11_GBG51) and CALGB 40503 (Alliance) trials.

M Martín1, S Loibl2, T Hyslop3, J De la Haba-Rodríguez4, B Aktas5, C T Cirrincione3, K Mehta2, W T Barry6, S Morales7, L A Carey8, J A Garcia-Saenz9, A Partridge10, N Martinez-Jañez11, O Hahn12, E Winer10, A Guerrero-Zotano13, C Hudis14, M Casas15, C Rodriguez-Martin15, J Furlanetto2, E Carrasco15, M N Dickler16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Randomised trials comparing the efficacy of standard endocrine therapy (ET) versus experimental ET + bevacizumab (Bev) in 1st line hormone receptor-positive patients with metastatic breast cancer have thus far shown conflicting results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We pooled data from two similar phase III randomised trials of ET ± Bev (LEA and Cancer and Leukemia Group B 40503) to increase precision in estimating treatment effect. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and safety. Exploratory analyses were performed within subgroups defined by patients with recurrent disease, de novo disease, prior endocrine sensitivity or resistance and reported grades III-IV hypertension and proteinuria.
RESULTS: The pooled sample consisted of 749 patients randomised to ET or ET + Bev. Median PFS was 14.3 months for ET versus 19 months for ET + Bev (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.91; p < 0.01). ORR and CBR with ET and ET + Bev were 40 versus 61% (p < 0.01) and 64 versus 77% (p < 0.01), respectively. There was no difference in OS (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.77-1.18; p = 0.68). PFS was superior for ET + Bev for endocrine-sensitive patients (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.53-0.89; p = 0.004). Grade III-IV hypertension (2.2 versus 20.1%), proteinuria (0 versus 9.3%), cardiovascular (0.5 versus 4.2%) and liver events (0 versus 2.9%) were significantly higher for ET + Bev (all p < 0.01). Hypertension and proteinuria were not predictors of efficacy (interaction test p = 0.33).
CONCLUSION: The addition of Bev to ET increased PFS overall and in endocrine-sensitive patients but not OS at the expense of significant additional toxicity. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.Gov NCT00545077 and NCT00601900.
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced breast cancer; Bevacizumab; Endocrine therapy; Pooled-analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31276981      PMCID: PMC6718694          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  15 in total

1.  Motesanib, or open-label bevacizumab, in combination with paclitaxel, as first-line treatment for HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Miguel Martin; Henri Roche; Tamas Pinter; John Crown; M John Kennedy; Louise Provencher; Frank Priou; Wolfgang Eiermann; Encarna Adrover; Istvan Lang; Manuel Ramos; Jean Latreille; Agnieszka Jagiełło-Gruszfeld; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Emilio Alba; Raymond Snyder; Sachin Almel; Janusz Rolski; Montserrat Munoz; Rebecca Moroose; Sara Hurvitz; Ana Baños; Henry Adewoye; Yong-Jiang Hei; Mary-Ann Lindsay; Matthieu Rupin; David Cabaribere; Yasmin Lemmerick; John R Mackey
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 2.  Controlling angiogenesis in breast cancer: a systematic review of anti-angiogenic trials.

Authors:  John R Mackey; Robert S Kerbel; Karen A Gelmon; Deanna M McLeod; Stephen K Chia; Daniel Rayson; Sunil Verma; Loretta L Collins; Alexander H G Paterson; André Robidoux; Kathleen I Pritchard
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 12.111

3.  High tumor levels of vascular endothelial growth factor predict poor response to systemic therapy in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Foekens; H A Peters; N Grebenchtchikov; M P Look; M E Meijer-van Gelder; A Geurts-Moespot; T H van der Kwast; C G Sweep; J G Klijn
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase II study of axitinib plus docetaxel versus docetaxel plus placebo in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Hope S Rugo; Alison T Stopeck; Anil A Joy; Stephen Chan; Shailendra Verma; Anna Lluch; Katherine F Liau; Sinil Kim; Paul Bycott; Brad Rosbrook; Angel H Bair; Denis Soulieres
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  First-line treatment of advanced breast cancer with sunitinib in combination with docetaxel versus docetaxel alone: results of a prospective, randomized phase III study.

Authors:  Jonas Bergh; Igor M Bondarenko; Mikhail R Lichinitser; Annelie Liljegren; Richard Greil; Nataliya L Voytko; Anatoly N Makhson; Javier Cortes; Alain Lortholary; Joachim Bischoff; Arlene Chan; Suzette Delaloge; Xin Huang; Kenneth A Kern; Carla Giorgetti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  RIBBON-1: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas J Robert; Véronique Diéras; John Glaspy; Adam M Brufsky; Igor Bondarenko; Oleg N Lipatov; Edith A Perez; Denise A Yardley; Stephen Y T Chan; Xian Zhou; See-Chun Phan; Joyce O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Phase III study of bevacizumab plus docetaxel compared with placebo plus docetaxel for the first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  David W Miles; Arlene Chan; Luc Y Dirix; Javier Cortés; Xavier Pivot; Piotr Tomczak; Thierry Delozier; Joo Hyuk Sohn; Louise Provencher; Fabio Puglisi; Nadia Harbeck; Guenther G Steger; Andreas Schneeweiss; Andrew M Wardley; Andreas Chlistalla; Gilles Romieu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  RIBBON-2: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for second-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Adam M Brufsky; Sara Hurvitz; Edith Perez; Raji Swamy; Vicente Valero; Vincent O'Neill; Hope S Rugo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Vascular endothelial growth factor reduces tamoxifen efficacy and promotes metastatic colonization and desmoplasia in breast tumors.

Authors:  Zhican Qu; Sabrina Van Ginkel; Anshu M Roy; Louise Westbrook; Mubina Nasrin; Yulia Maxuitenko; Andra R Frost; Delicia Carey; Wenquan Wang; Rongbao Li; William E Grizzle; Jaideep V Thottassery; Francis G Kern
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Kathy Miller; Molin Wang; Julie Gralow; Maura Dickler; Melody Cobleigh; Edith A Perez; Tamara Shenkier; David Cella; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  Machine learning-based image analysis for accelerating the diagnosis of complicated preneoplastic and neoplastic ductal lesions in breast biopsy tissues.

Authors:  Shinya Sato; Satoshi Maki; Takashi Yamanaka; Daisuke Hoshino; Yukihide Ota; Emi Yoshioka; Kae Kawachi; Kota Washimi; Masaki Suzuki; Yoichiro Ohkubo; Tomoyuki Yokose; Toshinari Yamashita; Seiji Ohtori; Yohei Miyagi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Carboplatin-Cyclophosphamide or Paclitaxel without or with Bevacizumab as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (BOOG 2013-01).

Authors:  Annelot G J van Rossum; Ingrid A M Mandjes; Erik van Werkhoven; Harm van Tinteren; A Elise van Leeuwen-Stok; Petra Nederlof; Johanna E A Portielje; Robbert J van Alphen; Els Platte; Daan van den Broek; Alwin Huitema; Marleen Kok; Sabine C Linn; Hendrika M Oosterkamp
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  Review of concepts in therapeutic decision-making in HER2-negative luminal metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  I Alvarez-Lopez; S Bezares; E Dalmau Portulas; E García-Martínez; J Á García-Sáenz; M Gil-Gil; E Martínez de Dueñas; N Ribelles; A Santaballa Bertrán
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 4.  Targeting Angiogenesis in Breast Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives of Novel Anti-Angiogenic Approaches.

Authors:  Nehad M Ayoub; Sara K Jaradat; Kamal M Al-Shami; Amer E Alkhalifa
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Front-Line Bevacizumab plus Chemotherapy with or without Maintenance Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Observational Study by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group.

Authors:  Stefania Kokkali; Emmanouil Saloustros; Dimitra Stefanou; Paris Makrantonakis; Nikolaos Kentepozidis; Ioannis Boukovinas; Nikolaos Xenidis; Panagiotis Katsaounis; Alexandros Ardavanis; Nikolaos Ziras; Athina Christopoulou; George Rigas; Kostas Kalbakis; Nikolaos Vardakis; Christos Emmanouilides; Ilias Athanasiadis; Athanassios Anagnostopoulos; Dora Hatzidaki; Efthimios Prinarakis; Foteini Simopoulou; Athanasios Kotsakis; Vassilis Georgoulias
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.