| Literature DB >> 28830554 |
Xiao-Ping Chen1, Wen-Ge Li1, Hao Zheng1, Hai-Yan Du2, Li Zhang2, Lei Zhang2, Jie Che1, Yuan Wu1, Shu-Mei Liu3,4, Jin-Xing Lu5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are recognized as a large reservoir of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) harboured by Staphylococcus aureus. However, data of SCCmec in CoNS are relatively absent particularly in China.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterial cell wall integrity; Coagulase-negative staphylococci; Multiple SCCmec
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28830554 PMCID: PMC5568392 DOI: 10.1186/s12941-017-0231-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ISSN: 1476-0711 Impact factor: 3.944
Detection of mecA segments and SCCmec typing results of CoNS isolates
| Character of SCC | Source | Species |
|
|
| SCC | No. of isolate | Example isolate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Previously identified single SCC | Clinic |
| + | A | 4 | VIII | 3 | H80, H86 |
| + | A | 2 | II | 1 | H59 | |||
|
| + | A | 3 | III | 4 | H8 | ||
| + | B | 2 | IV | 3 | H67, H11 | |||
| + | C2 | 5 | V | 2 | H81 | |||
| + | A | 2 | II | 1 | ||||
|
| + | C2 | 1 | IX | 1 | |||
|
| + | A | 3 | III | 3 | H4 | ||
| + | C2 | 5 | V | 5 | H7, H26, H54, H60, H85 | |||
|
|
| |||||||
| Community |
| + | A | 2 | II | 6 | ||
|
|
| |||||||
| New identified single SCC | Clinic |
| + | A | 1 | New | 3 | H29, H34 |
|
| + | C1 | 4 | New | 5 | H2 | ||
| + | C1 | 2 | New | 1 | ||||
|
|
| |||||||
| Community |
| + | C1 | 2 | New | 1 | CJ31-1 | |
|
|
| |||||||
| New type with a single | Clinic |
| + | A | 1, 4 | New | 2 | H1 |
| + | A | 1, 2 | New | 1 | H73 | |||
| + | A | 2, 4 | New | 2 | ||||
| + | A | 3, 4 | New | 1 | HA1 | |||
| + | A | 1, 4, 5 | New | 2 | H6 | |||
| + | A | 1, 3, 4, 5 | New | 1 | ||||
|
| + | A | 1, 3 | New | 5 | H22 | ||
| + | A | 1, 3, 4 | New | 2 | H21 | |||
| + | A | 3, 4, 5 | New | 1 | H92 | |||
| + | C2 | 4, 5 | New | 1 | H76 | |||
| + | C2 | 1, 2, 5 | New | 1 | ||||
| + | B | 2, 4 | New | 3 | H24, H77 | |||
|
| + | A | 1, 2, 4 | New | 1 | |||
| + | C2 | 2, 4 | New | 1 | H28 | |||
| + | C2 | 4, 5 | New | 1 | H68 | |||
| + | C2 | 1, 4 | New | 2 | H15, H36 | |||
|
| + | A | 3, 4 | New | 1 | H23 | ||
| + | A | 1, 2, 4, 5 | New | 1 | H37 | |||
| + | A | 1, 2, 3, 5 | New | 1 | H83 | |||
| + | A | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | New | 1 | H72 | |||
| + | C2 | 2, 4, 5 | New | 1 | H78 | |||
| + | C2 | 1, 2, 4, 5 | New | 1 | ||||
|
|
| |||||||
| New type with a single | Community |
| + | A | 2, 4 | New | 1 | |
| + | A | 2, 4, 5 | New | 1 | ||||
| + | B | 1, 2 | New | 3 | ||||
| + | B | 2, 4 | New | 1 | ||||
|
|
| |||||||
| New type with multi SCC | Clinic |
| + | A, C2 | 1, 4, 5 | New | 1 | |
| + | A, C2 | 1, 2, 4, 5 | New | 2 | H33-2 | |||
| + | A, C2 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | New | 1 | H62 | |||
|
| + | A, B | 2, 4, 5 | New | 1 | |||
| + | A, B | 2, 3, 5 | New | 1 | ||||
| + | A, B | 2, 3, 4, 5 | New | 1 | H30 | |||
| + | A, B | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | New | 1 | ||||
| + | A, C2 | 1, 5 | New | 1 | ||||
| + | A, C2 | 2, 4, 5 | New | 1 | H87 | |||
| + | A, C2 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | New | 1 | H57 | |||
|
| + | A, B | 1, 2, 3, 4 | New | 1 | HA11 | ||
|
|
| A, C2 | 1, 2, 4, 5 | New | 1 | H14 | ||
|
|
| |||||||
| Community |
| + | A, B | 2 | New | 1 | ||
| + | A, B | 1 | New | 1 | CV34 | |||
| + | A, B | 2, 4 | New | 1 | C3-1 | |||
|
| + | A, B | 1, 2 | New | 1 | |||
| + | A, C2 | 2, 5 | New | 1 | ||||
|
|
| |||||||
| Isolates without | Community |
| − | − | 2 | N | 2 | C13-2 |
|
| − | − | 2 | N | 15 | C5-1, CJ29 | ||
| − | − | 1, 2 | N | 1 | ||||
| − | − | 2, 5 | N | 2 | ||||
| − | − | 5 | N | 2 | CJ28-3 | |||
| − | − | 2, 4 | N | 1 | CV33-1 | |||
| − | − | – | N | 5 | ||||
|
| − | − | 2, 4 | N | 1 | |||
|
|
| |||||||
S. homi, S. hominis; S. epid, S. epidermidis; S. haem, S. haemolyticus; S.capit, S. capitis, −, mecA negative; N, not available
Fig. 1mRNA expression analyses of the amplified fragments of mecA in CoNS with single SCCmec elements (a) and those with multiple SCCmec elements (b). Two-millilitres culture of CoNS treated with oxacillin (2 μg/ml) for 10 h were used for mecA mRNA transcription analyses by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR); after treatment with oxacillin (2 μg/ml) and actinomycin D (2 μg/ml), mecA mRNA half-lives were determined by RT-PCR (c). mRNA expression levels were described in terms of intensity using Quantity One Imager. Data are shown as the image of three independent experiments with similar results
Fig. 2Growth curve indicated total cells in a 2-ml culture of S. epidermidis H8, H30 treated with oxacillin at each time point for 10 h (upper left). The corresponding relative total mecA mRNA in 2-ml sample treated with oxacillin at each time point was measured by quantitative RT real-time PCR (lower right). Data were presented as the relative copies of mecA mRNA levels compared with that of S. epidermidis H8 (0 h). Each bar represents the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. *P < 0.05 between two strains at each time point
Fig. 3Bacterial cell wall integrity under oxacillin treatment (8 μg/ml). Samples were collected for Gram staining at 0, 1, and 3 h to visualize the bacterial cell wall under a microscope. The proportion of bacteria cells demonstrated as Gram-negative among every 100 total cells, was manually calculated according to three microscope fields for each sample. The results are shown as the mean value of three microscope fields. Data are shown as the images of three independent experiments with similar results
Fig. 4Neighbour-joining tree based on ccr sequences determined in this study and those downloaded from GenBank. Those with bold italic font represent ccr sequences recovered in this study and those underlined represent isolates from the community