Literature DB >> 28830226

Lumbar spine evaluation: accuracy on abdominal CT.

Mitchell A Klein1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the lumbar spine can be accurately evaluated on an abdominal CT.
METHODS: The electronic medical records at our institution were searched to find all consecutive patients who had an abdominal CT within 12 months of a lumbar spine MRI obtained between 01 November 2010 and 31 October 2015. The abdominal CT studies were retrospectively reviewed in a blinded fashion for the presence of any significant lumbar spine abnormalities. The prospective lumbar spine MRI reports were used as the standard of reference.
RESULTS: 5,031 patients had lumbar spine MRI studies at our institution during the study period of 01 November 2010 to 31 October 2015. 144 patients met the inclusion criteria of our study. No patients were excluded. 107 patients had 256 abnormal findings on the lumbar spine MRI studies. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of abdominal CT in lumbar spine evaluation on a per patient/per finding basis were 89.7/95.3%, 97.3/100%, 99.0/99.2%, 76.6/99.8% and 91.7/99.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Despite several limitations (e.g. spinal cord assessment, bone marrow assessment and quantum mottle) compared with evaluation of the lumbar spine using MRI, evaluation of the lumbar spine on abdominal CT studies can be accurately performed with current state of the art CT scanners. Additional prospective studies are needed for a more definitive analysis. Advances in knowledge: With recent advances in CT technology, accurate evaluation of the lumbar spine on abdominal CT studies is feasible, potentially providing significant additional information to patients without additional imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28830226      PMCID: PMC5963372          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  18 in total

Review 1.  Lumbar spine MRI for low back pain: indications and yield.

Authors:  Bahman Roudsari; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using multidetector CT.

Authors:  J S Bauer; D Müller; A Ambekar; M Dobritz; M Matsuura; F Eckstein; E J Rummeny; T M Link
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-31       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Radiation dose-reduction strategies for neuroradiology CT protocols.

Authors:  A B Smith; W P Dillon; R Gould; M Wintermark
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Whole-body MR imaging for detection of bone metastases in children and young adults: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG PET.

Authors:  H E Daldrup-Link; C Franzius; T M Link; D Laukamp; J Sciuk; H Jürgens; O Schober; E J Rummeny
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Spiral CT of the pancreas. The value of small field-of-view targeted reconstruction.

Authors:  T Nishiharu; Y Yamashita; I Ogata; S Sumi; K Mitsuzaki; M Takahashi
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Nandini D Patel; Daniel F Broderick; Judah Burns; Tejaswini K Deshmukh; Ian Blair Fries; H Benjamin Harvey; Langston Holly; Christopher H Hunt; Bharathi D Jagadeesan; Tabassum A Kennedy; John E O'Toole; Joel S Perlmutter; Bruno Policeni; Joshua M Rosenow; Jason W Schroeder; Matthew T Whitehead; Rebecca S Cornelius; Amanda S Corey
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Under-reporting of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on computed tomography.

Authors:  Alexandra L Williams; Aisha Al-Busaidi; Patrick J Sparrow; Judith E Adams; Richard W Whitehouse
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography.

Authors:  Richard D Nawfel; Philip F Judy; A Robert Schleipman; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Andrew H Haims; Edward P Monico; James A Brink; Howard P Forman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  Predicting Vertebral Bone Strength Using Finite Element Analysis for Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening in Routine Multidetector Computed Tomography Scans-A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Nithin Manohar Rayudu; Michael Dieckmeyer; Maximilian T Löffler; Peter B Noël; Jan S Kirschke; Thomas Baum; Karupppasamy Subburaj
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 5.555

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.