Literature DB >> 28829304

Using Microbubble as Contrast Agent for High-Energy X-Ray In-line Phase Contrast Imaging: Demonstration and Comparison Study.

Di Wu, Molly Donovan Wong, Kai Yang, Aimin Yan, Yuhua Li, Laurie Fajardo, Bin Zheng, Xizeng Wu, Hong Liu.   

Abstract

The ability of microbubbles to benefit the imaging quality of high-energy in-line phase contrast as compared with conventional low-energy contact mode radiography was investigated. The study was conducted by comparing in-line phase contrast imaging with conventional contact-mode projection imaging under the same dose delivered to a phantom. A custom-designed phantom was employed to simulate a segment of human blood vessel injected with microbubble suspensions. The microbubbles were suspended in deionized water to obtain different volume concentrations. The area contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values corresponding to both imaging methods were measured for different microbubble volume concentrations. The phase contrast images were processed by phase-attenuation duality phase retrieval to preserve the imaging quality. Comparison of the resultant CNR values indicates that the microbubble suspension images deliver a higher CNR than the water-only image, with monotonically increasing trends between the CNR values and microbubble concentrations. Compared to low-energy conventional images of the microbubble suspensions, high-energy in-line phase contrast CNRs are lower at high concentrations and are comparable, even better than, at low concentrations. This result suggests that 1) the performance of copolymer-shell microbubble employed in this study as x-ray contrast agent is constrained by the detective quantum efficiency of the system and the attenuation properties of the shell materials, 2) the phase-attenuation duality phase retrieval method has the potential to preserve image quality for areas with low concentration of microbubbles, and 3) the selection of microbubble products as a phase contrast agent may follow criteria of minimizing the impact of absorption attenuation properties of the shells and maximizing the difference factor of electron densities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28829304      PMCID: PMC5821607          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2017.2741942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  21 in total

1.  Measurement of image contrast using diffraction enhanced imaging.

Authors:  Miklos Z Kiss; Dale E Sayers; Zhong Zhong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  An experimental method of determining relative phase-contrast factor for x-ray imaging systems.

Authors:  Xizeng Wua; Hong Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A general theoretical formalism for X-ray phase contrast imaging.

Authors:  Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 1.535

4.  Microbubbles as x-ray scattering contrast agents using analyzer-based imaging.

Authors:  F Arfelli; L Rigon; R H Menk
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Characterization of a high-energy in-line phase contrast tomosynthesis prototype.

Authors:  Di Wu; Aimin Yan; Yuhua Li; Molly D Wong; Bin Zheng; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Cadaveric and in vivo human joint imaging based on differential phase contrast by X-ray Talbot-Lau interferometry.

Authors:  Junji Tanaka; Masabumi Nagashima; Kazuhiro Kido; Yoshihide Hoshino; Junko Kiyohara; Chiho Makifuchi; Satoshi Nishino; Sumiya Nagatsuka; Atsushi Momose
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.820

7.  Speckle-based x-ray phase-contrast and dark-field imaging with a laboratory source.

Authors:  I Zanette; T Zhou; A Burvall; U Lundström; D H Larsson; M Zdora; P Thibault; F Pfeiffer; H M Hertz
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  Dose and detectability improvements with high energy phase sensitive x-ray imaging in comparison to low energy conventional imaging.

Authors:  Molly Donovan Wong; Aimin Yan; Muhammad Ghani; Yuhua Li; Laurie Fajardo; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Mammography with synchrotron radiation: first clinical experience with phase-detection technique.

Authors:  Edoardo Castelli; Maura Tonutti; Fulvia Arfelli; Renata Longo; Emilio Quaia; Luigi Rigon; Daniela Sanabor; Fabrizio Zanconati; Diego Dreossi; Alessando Abrami; Elisa Quai; Paola Bregant; Katia Casarin; Valentina Chenda; Ralf Hendrik Menk; Tatjana Rokvic; Alessandro Vascotto; Giuliana Tromba; Maria Assunta Cova
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Quantitative investigation of the edge enhancement in in-line phase contrast projections and tomosynthesis provided by distributing microbubbles on the interface between two tissues: a phantom study.

Authors:  Di Wu; Molly Donovan Wong; Yuhua Li; Laurie Fajardo; Bin Zheng; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Comparison of propagation-based CT using synchrotron radiation and conventional cone-beam CT for breast imaging.

Authors:  Seyedamir Tavakoli Taba; Patrycja Baran; Yakov I Nesterets; Serena Pacile; Susanne Wienbeck; Christian Dullin; Konstantin Pavlov; Anton Maksimenko; Darren Lockie; Sheridan C Mayo; Harry M Quiney; Diego Dreossi; Fulvia Arfelli; Giuliana Tromba; Sarah Lewis; Timur E Gureyev; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Microbubbles as a contrast agent in grating interferometry mammography: an ex vivo proof-of-mechanism study.

Authors:  Kristina Lång; Carolina Arboleda; Serafino Forte; Zhentian Wang; Sven Prevrhal; Thomas Koehler; Norbert Kuhn; Bernd David; Konstantins Jefimovs; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Marco Stampanoni
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2019-05-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.