Literature DB >> 28828569

A review of recent advances in data analytics for post-operative patient deterioration detection.

Clemence Petit1,2, Rick Bezemer2, Louis Atallah3.   

Abstract

Most deaths occurring due to a surgical intervention happen postoperatively rather than during surgery. The current standard of care in many hospitals cannot fully cope with detecting and addressing post-surgical deterioration in time. For millions of patients, this deterioration is left unnoticed, leading to increased mortality and morbidity. Postoperative deterioration detection currently relies on general scores that are not fully able to cater for the complex post-operative physiology of surgical patients. In the last decade however, advanced risk and warning scoring techniques have started to show encouraging results in terms of using the large amount of data available peri-operatively to improve postoperative deterioration detection. Relevant literature has been carefully surveyed to provide a summary of the most promising approaches as well as how they have been deployed in the perioperative domain. This work also aims to highlight the opportunities that lie in personalizing the models developed for patient deterioration for these particular post-surgical patients and make the output more actionable. The integration of pre- and intra-operative data, e.g. comorbidities, vitals, lab data, and information about the procedure performed, in post-operative early warning algorithms would lead to more contextualized, personalized, and adaptive patient modelling. This, combined with careful integration in the clinical workflow, would result in improved clinical decision support and better post-surgical care outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data analytics; Deterioration detection; Early warning scores; Perioperative care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28828569     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-017-0054-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  73 in total

1.  An Apgar score for surgery.

Authors:  Atul A Gawande; Mary R Kwaan; Scott E Regenbogen; Stuart A Lipsitz; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  The ASA Physical Status Classification: inter-observer consistency. American Society of Anesthesiologists.

Authors:  P H K Mak; R C H Campbell; M G Irwin
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.669

3.  Broadly applicable risk stratification system for predicting duration of hospitalization and mortality.

Authors:  Daniel I Sessler; Jeffrey C Sigl; Paul J Manberg; Scott D Kelley; Armin Schubert; Nassib G Chamoun
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Surgical outcome measurement for a global patient population: validation of the Surgical Apgar Score in 8 countries.

Authors:  Alex B Haynes; Scott E Regenbogen; Thomas G Weiser; Stuart R Lipsitz; Gerald Dziekan; William R Berry; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Incidence, location and reasons for avoidable in-hospital cardiac arrest in a district general hospital.

Authors:  Timothy J Hodgetts; Gary Kenward; Ioannis Vlackonikolis; Susan Payne; Nicolas Castle; Robert Crouch; Neil Ineson; Loua Shaikh
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  Multicenter Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Regression for Predicting Clinical Deterioration on the Wards.

Authors:  Matthew M Churpek; Trevor C Yuen; Christopher Winslow; David O Meltzer; Michael W Kattan; Dana P Edelson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Serum albumin is an early predictor of complications after liver surgery.

Authors:  Ismail Labgaa; Gaëtan-Romain Joliat; Nicolas Demartines; Martin Hübner
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 4.088

8.  Preoperative Score to Predict Postoperative Mortality (POSPOM): Derivation and Validation.

Authors:  Yannick Le Manach; Gary Collins; Reitze Rodseth; Christine Le Bihan-Benjamin; Bruce Biccard; Bruno Riou; P J Devereaux; Paul Landais
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 9.  A critical assessment of monitoring practices, patient deterioration, and alarm fatigue on inpatient wards: a review.

Authors:  J Paul Curry; Carla R Jungquist
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2014-06-27

10.  Prediction and detection models for acute kidney injury in hospitalized older adults.

Authors:  Rohit J Kate; Ruth M Perez; Debesh Mazumdar; Kalyan S Pasupathy; Vani Nilakantan
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  3 in total

1.  Implementation of an automated early warning scoring system in a surgical ward: Practical use and effects on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Eveline Mestrom; Ashley De Bie; Melissa van de Steeg; Merel Driessen; Louis Atallah; Rick Bezemer; R Arthur Bouwman; Erik Korsten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Wearable devices to monitor recovery after abdominal surgery: scoping review.

Authors:  Cameron I Wells; William Xu; James A Penfold; Celia Keane; Armen A Gharibans; Ian P Bissett; Greg O'Grady
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-03-08

3.  Adaptive threshold-based alarm strategies for continuous vital signs monitoring.

Authors:  Mathilde C van Rossum; Lyan B Vlaskamp; Linda M Posthuma; Maarten J Visscher; Martine J M Breteler; Hermie J Hermens; Cor J Kalkman; Benedikt Preckel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 1.977

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.