Literature DB >> 21216419

Surgical outcome measurement for a global patient population: validation of the Surgical Apgar Score in 8 countries.

Alex B Haynes1, Scott E Regenbogen, Thomas G Weiser, Stuart R Lipsitz, Gerald Dziekan, William R Berry, Atul A Gawande.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical care is a vital component of health care worldwide, yet there is no clinically meaningful measure of operative outcomes that could be applied globally. The Surgical Apgar Score, a simple metric derived from 3 intraoperative parameters, has been shown in U.S. academic medical centers to predict 30-day patient outcomes after operation, but has not been validated more broadly.
METHODS: We collected the components of the Surgical Apgar Score at the time of operation for 5,909 adult patients undergoing noncardiac operative procedures under general anesthesia at 8 hospitals in diverse international settings and evaluated the relationship between patients' scores and the incidence of inpatient postoperative morbidity and mortality, using generalized estimating equations to adjust for clustering within sites.
RESULTS: During the first 30 days of postoperative hospitalization, 544 patients (9.2%) experienced ≥ 1 complications. Compared with patients with the median score of 7--whose complication rate was 9.1%-those with a Surgical Apgar Score <5 (n = 302) had an adjusted complication rate of 32.9% (relative risk [RR],3.6; 95% CI, 2.9-4.5), whereas those with a score of 10 (n = 238) had a 3.0% adjusted complication rate (RR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-1.1). The score's c-statistic for prediction of any complication is 0.70; for death it is 0.77.
CONCLUSION: The Surgical Apgar Score is easily calculated, predictive, and moderately discriminative for major complications among adults undergoing inpatient noncardiac operative procedures. Such a score could provide objective indication of relative postoperative risk for inpatients and provide a potential target for quality improvement efforts, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21216419     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.10.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  32 in total

1.  Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in a district general hospital.

Authors:  Christopher C Thorn; Melanie Chan; Nihal Sinha; Richard A Harrison
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Improving tuberculosis screening and isoniazid preventive therapy in an HIV clinic in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  S Zaeh; R Kempker; E Stenehjem; H M Blumberg; O Temesgen; I Ofotokun; A Tenna
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The surgical apgar score predicts postoperative ICU admission.

Authors:  Nina E Glass; Antonio Pinna; Antonio Masi; Alan S Rosman; Dena Neihaus; Shunpei Okochi; John K Saunders; Ioannis Hatzaras; Steven Cohen; Russell Berman; Elliot Newman; H Leon Pachter; Thomas H Gouge; Marcovalerio Melis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Derivation, Validation and Application of a Pragmatic Risk Prediction Index for Benchmarking of Surgical Outcomes.

Authors:  Richard T Spence; David C Chang; Haytham M A Kaafarani; Eugenio Panieri; Geoffrey A Anderson; Matthew M Hutter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Can the Surgical Apgar Score predict morbidity and mortality in general orthopaedic surgery?

Authors:  Julio Urrutia; Macarena Valdes; Tomas Zamora; Valentina Canessa; Jorge Briceno
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The value of esophagectomy surgical apgar score (eSAS) in predicting the risk of major morbidity after open esophagectomy.

Authors:  Xue-Zhong Xing; Hai-Jun Wang; Shi-Ning Qu; Chu-Lin Huang; Hao Zhang; Hao Wang; Quan-Hui Yang; Yong Gao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  A review of recent advances in data analytics for post-operative patient deterioration detection.

Authors:  Clemence Petit; Rick Bezemer; Louis Atallah
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Learning Curve Characteristics for Caesarean Section Among Associate Clinicians: A Prospective Study from Sierra Leone.

Authors:  B P Waalewijn; A van Duinen; A P Koroma; M J Rijken; M Elhassein; H A Bolkan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Use of the surgical Apgar score to guide postoperative care.

Authors:  J B Haddow; H Adwan; S E Clark; S Tayeh; S S Antonowicz; P Jayia; D W Chicken; T Wiggins; R Davenport; S Kaptanis; M Fakhry; C H Knowles; A S Elmetwally; E Geddoa; M S Nair; I Naeem; S Adegbola; L J Muirhead
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  An Objective Assessment of the Surgical Trainee in an Urban Trauma Unit in South Africa: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Richard Trafford Spence; Eiman Zargaran; Morad Hameed; Andrew Nicol; Pradeep Navsaria
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.