Literature DB >> 27655239

Carolinas Comfort Scale as a Measure of Hernia Repair Quality of Life: A Reappraisal Utilizing 3788 International Patients.

B Todd Heniford1, Amy E Lincourt, Amanda L Walters, Paul D Colavita, Igor Belyansky, Kent W Kercher, Ronald F Sing, Vedra A Augenstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to reaffirm the psychometric properties of the CCS using an expansive, multinational cohort.
BACKGROUND: The Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) is a validated, disease-specific, quality of life (QOL) questionnaire developed for patients undergoing hernia repair.
METHODS: The data were obtained from the International Hernia Mesh Registry, an American, European, and Australian prospective, hernia repair database designed to capture information delineating patient demographics, surgical findings, and QOL using the CCS at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: A total of 3788 patients performed 11,060 postoperative surveys. Patient response rates exceeded 80% at 1 year postoperatively. Acceptability was demonstrated by an average of less than 2 missing items per survey. The formal test of reliability revealed a global Cronbach's alpha exceeding 0.95 for all hernia types. Test-retest validity was supported by the correlation found between 2 different administrations of the CCS using the kappa coefficient. Principal component analysis identified 2 components with a good distribution of variance, with the first component explaining approximately 60% of the variance, regardless of hernia type. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing survey responses and use of pain medication at 1 month postoperatively and analysis revealed that symptomatic patients demonstrated significantly higher odds of requiring pain medication in all activity domains and for all hernia types.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirms that the CCS questionnaire is a validated, sensitive, and robust instrument for assessing QOL after hernia repair, which has become a predominant outcome measure in this discipline of surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 27655239     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  26 in total

1.  A systematic methodological review of reported perioperative variables, postoperative outcomes and hernia recurrence from randomised controlled trials of elective ventral hernia repair: clear definitions and standardised datasets are needed.

Authors:  Samuel G Parker; C P J Wood; J W Butterworth; R W Boulton; A A O Plumb; S Mallett; S Halligan; A C J Windsor
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Robotic ventral hernia repair: a safe and durable approach.

Authors:  M E Sharbaugh; P B Patel; J A Zaman; A Ata; P Feustel; K Singh; T P Singh
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Impact of Abdominal Wall Hernias and Repair on Patient Quality of Life.

Authors:  Deepa V Cherla; Maya L Moses; Cristina P Viso; Julie L Holihan; Juan R Flores-Gonzalez; Lillian S Kao; Tien C Ko; Mike K Liang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Pain and compression neuropathy in primary inguinal hernia.

Authors:  R Wright; D E Born; N D'Souza; L Hurd; R Gill; D Wright
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Short-term quality of life comparison of laparoscopic, open, and robotic incisional hernia repairs.

Authors:  Beau Forester; Mikhail Attaar; Kara Donovan; Kristine Kuchta; Michael Ujiki; Woody Denham; Stephen P Haggerty; JoAnn Carbray; John Linn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The impact of component separation technique versus no component separation technique on complications and quality of life in the repair of large ventral hernias.

Authors:  Sean R Maloney; Kathryn A Schlosser; Tanushree Prasad; Paul D Colavita; Kent W Kercher; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Are laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs truly comparable?: A propensity-matched study in large ventral hernias.

Authors:  Jenny M Shao; Eva B Deerenberg; Sharbel A Elhage; Paul D Colavita; Tanu Prasad; Vedra A Augenstein; Kent W Kercher; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A registry-based 2-year follow-up comparative study of two meshes used in transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) groin hernia repair.

Authors:  J F Gillion; M Soler; J M Chollet
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Totally extraperitoneal approach for open complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Shyanie Kumar; R Wesley Edmunds; Michael J Nisiewicz; Zachary D Warriner; Yu-Wei Wayne Chang; Margaret A Plymale; Daniel L Davenport; Alexander Wade; John Scott Roth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Inguinal hernia mesh is safe in 1720 patients.

Authors:  Beau Forester; Mikhail Attaar; Maya Lach; Sebastian Chirayil; Kristine Kuchta; Woody Denham; John G Linn; Stephen P Haggerty; JoAnn Carbray; Michael Ujiki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.