Andrew J Karter1,2,3,4, E Margaret Warton1, Kasia J Lipska5, James D Ralston6, Howard H Moffet1, Geoffrey G Jackson6, Elbert S Huang7, Donald R Miller8. 1. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland. 2. Department of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco. 3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle. 4. Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle. 5. Section of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 6. Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle. 7. Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 8. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: Hypoglycemia-related emergency department (ED) or hospital use among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is clinically significant and possibly preventable. Objective: To develop and validate a tool to categorize risk of hypoglycemic-related utilization in patients with T2D. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using recursive partitioning with a split-sample design, we created a classification tree based on potential predictors of hypoglycemia-related ED or hospital use. The resulting model was transcribed into a tool for practical application and tested in 1 internal and 2 fully independent, external samples. Development and internal testing was conducted in a split sample of 206 435 patients with T2D from Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), an integrated health care system. The tool was externally tested in 1 335 966 Veterans Health Administration and 14 972 Group Health Cooperative patients with T2D. Exposures: Based on a literature review, we identified 156 candidate predictor variables (prebaseline exposures) using data collected from electronic medical records. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hypoglycemia-related ED or hospital use during 12 months of follow-up. Results: The derivation sample (n = 165 148) had a mean (SD) age of 63.9 (13.0) years and included 78 576 (47.6%) women. The crude annual rate of at least 1 hypoglycemia-related ED or hospital encounter in the KPNC derivation sample was 0.49%. The resulting hypoglycemia risk stratification tool required 6 patient-specific inputs: number of prior episodes of hypoglycemia-related utilization, insulin use, sulfonylurea use, prior year ED use, chronic kidney disease stage, and age. We categorized the predicted 12-month risk of any hypoglycemia-related utilization as high (>5%), intermediate (1%-5%), or low (<1%). In the internal validation sample, 2.0%, 10.7%, and 87.3% were categorized as high, intermediate, and low risk, respectively, with observed 12-month hypoglycemia-related utilization rates of 6.7%, 1.4%, and 0.2%, respectively. There was good discrimination in the internal validation KPNC sample (C statistic = 0.83) and both external validation samples (Veterans Health Administration: C statistic = 0.81; Group Health Cooperative: C statistic = 0.79). Conclusions and Relevance: This hypoglycemia risk stratification tool categorizes the 12-month risk of hypoglycemia-related utilization in patients with T2D using only 6 inputs. This tool could facilitate targeted population management interventions, potentially reducing hypoglycemia risk and improving patient safety and quality of life.
Importance: Hypoglycemia-related emergency department (ED) or hospital use among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is clinically significant and possibly preventable. Objective: To develop and validate a tool to categorize risk of hypoglycemic-related utilization in patients with T2D. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using recursive partitioning with a split-sample design, we created a classification tree based on potential predictors of hypoglycemia-related ED or hospital use. The resulting model was transcribed into a tool for practical application and tested in 1 internal and 2 fully independent, external samples. Development and internal testing was conducted in a split sample of 206 435 patients with T2D from Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), an integrated health care system. The tool was externally tested in 1 335 966 Veterans Health Administration and 14 972 Group Health Cooperative patients with T2D. Exposures: Based on a literature review, we identified 156 candidate predictor variables (prebaseline exposures) using data collected from electronic medical records. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hypoglycemia-related ED or hospital use during 12 months of follow-up. Results: The derivation sample (n = 165 148) had a mean (SD) age of 63.9 (13.0) years and included 78 576 (47.6%) women. The crude annual rate of at least 1 hypoglycemia-related ED or hospital encounter in the KPNC derivation sample was 0.49%. The resulting hypoglycemia risk stratification tool required 6 patient-specific inputs: number of prior episodes of hypoglycemia-related utilization, insulin use, sulfonylurea use, prior year ED use, chronic kidney disease stage, and age. We categorized the predicted 12-month risk of any hypoglycemia-related utilization as high (>5%), intermediate (1%-5%), or low (<1%). In the internal validation sample, 2.0%, 10.7%, and 87.3% were categorized as high, intermediate, and low risk, respectively, with observed 12-month hypoglycemia-related utilization rates of 6.7%, 1.4%, and 0.2%, respectively. There was good discrimination in the internal validation KPNC sample (C statistic = 0.83) and both external validation samples (Veterans Health Administration: C statistic = 0.81; Group Health Cooperative: C statistic = 0.79). Conclusions and Relevance: This hypoglycemia risk stratification tool categorizes the 12-month risk of hypoglycemia-related utilization in patients with T2D using only 6 inputs. This tool could facilitate targeted population management interventions, potentially reducing hypoglycemia risk and improving patient safety and quality of life.
Authors: Urmimala Sarkar; Andrew J Karter; Jennifer Y Liu; Howard H Moffet; Nancy E Adler; Dean Schillinger Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-05-18 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Rozalina G McCoy; Holly K Van Houten; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Nilay D Shah; Robert A Wermers; Steven A Smith Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-06-14 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Stefanie M P A Rondags; Maartje de Wit; Maurits W van Tulder; Michaela Diamant; Frank J Snoek Journal: BMC Endocr Disord Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 2.763
Authors: J E Signorovitch; D Macaulay; M Diener; Y Yan; E Q Wu; J-B Gruenberger; B M Frier Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: Sisi Ma; Pamela J Schreiner; Elizabeth R Seaquist; Mehmet Ugurbil; Rachel Zmora; Lisa S Chow Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Iram Ahmad; Leila R Zelnick; Zona Batacchi; Nicole Robinson; Ashveena Dighe; Jo-Anne E Manski-Nankervis; John Furler; David N O'Neal; Randie Little; Dace Trence; Irl B Hirsch; Nisha Bansal; Ian H de Boer Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Emily B Schroeder; John L Adams; Michel Chonchol; Gregory A Nichols; Patrick J O'Connor; J David Powers; Julie A Schmittdiel; Susan M Shetterly; John F Steiner Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 5.128