Grace K Mahoney1, Henry J Henk2, Rozalina G McCoy3. 1. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; OptumLabs, Cambridge, MA. 2. OptumLabs, Cambridge, MA. 3. Division of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Health Care Policy & Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: mccoy.rozalina@mayo.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the contemporary prevalence of intensive glucose-lowering therapy among US adults with diabetes and model the number of hypoglycemia-related emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations that are attributable to such intensive treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: US adults with diabetes and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels less than 7.0% who were included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2011 and 2014. Participants were categorized as clinically complex if 75 years or older or with 2 or more activities of daily living limitations, end-stage renal disease, or 3 or more chronic conditions. Intensive treatment was defined as any glucose-lowering medications with HbA1c levels of 5.6% or less or 2 or more with HbA1c levels of 5.7% to 6.4%. First, we quantified the proportion of clinically complex and intensively treated individuals in the NHANES population. Then, we modeled the attributable hypoglycemia-related ED visits/hospitalizations over a 2-year period based on published data for event risk. RESULTS: Almost half (48.8% [10,719,057 of 21,980,034]) of US adults with diabetes (representing 10.7 million US adults) had HbA1c levels less than 7.0%. Among them, 32.3% (3,466,713 of 10,719,057) were clinically complex, and 21.6% (2,309,556 of 10,719,057) were intensively treated, with no difference by clinical complexity. Over a 2-year period, we estimated 31,511 hospitalizations and 30,954 ED visits for hypoglycemia in this population; of these, 4774 (95% CI, 954-9714) hospitalizations and 4804 (95% CI, 862-9851) ED visits were attributable to intensive treatment. CONCLUSION: Intensive glucose-lowering therapy, particularly among vulnerable clinically complex adults, is strongly discouraged because it may lead to hypoglycemia. However, intensive treatment was equally prevalent among US adults, irrespective of clinical complexity. Over a 2-year period, an estimated 9578 hospitalizations and ED visits for hypoglycemia could be attributed to intensive diabetes treatment, particularly among clinically complex patients. Patients at risk for hypoglycemia may benefit from treatment deintensification to reduce hypoglycemia risk and treatment burden.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the contemporary prevalence of intensive glucose-lowering therapy among US adults with diabetes and model the number of hypoglycemia-related emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations that are attributable to such intensive treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: US adults with diabetes and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels less than 7.0% who were included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2011 and 2014. Participants were categorized as clinically complex if 75 years or older or with 2 or more activities of daily living limitations, end-stage renal disease, or 3 or more chronic conditions. Intensive treatment was defined as any glucose-lowering medications with HbA1c levels of 5.6% or less or 2 or more with HbA1c levels of 5.7% to 6.4%. First, we quantified the proportion of clinically complex and intensively treated individuals in the NHANES population. Then, we modeled the attributable hypoglycemia-related ED visits/hospitalizations over a 2-year period based on published data for event risk. RESULTS: Almost half (48.8% [10,719,057 of 21,980,034]) of US adults with diabetes (representing 10.7 million US adults) had HbA1c levels less than 7.0%. Among them, 32.3% (3,466,713 of 10,719,057) were clinically complex, and 21.6% (2,309,556 of 10,719,057) were intensively treated, with no difference by clinical complexity. Over a 2-year period, we estimated 31,511 hospitalizations and 30,954 ED visits for hypoglycemia in this population; of these, 4774 (95% CI, 954-9714) hospitalizations and 4804 (95% CI, 862-9851) ED visits were attributable to intensive treatment. CONCLUSION: Intensive glucose-lowering therapy, particularly among vulnerable clinically complex adults, is strongly discouraged because it may lead to hypoglycemia. However, intensive treatment was equally prevalent among US adults, irrespective of clinical complexity. Over a 2-year period, an estimated 9578 hospitalizations and ED visits for hypoglycemia could be attributed to intensive diabetes treatment, particularly among clinically complex patients. Patients at risk for hypoglycemia may benefit from treatment deintensification to reduce hypoglycemia risk and treatment burden.
Authors: Sophia Zoungas; Anushka Patel; John Chalmers; Bastiaan E de Galan; Qiang Li; Laurent Billot; Mark Woodward; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Bruce Neal; Stephen MacMahon; Diederick E Grobbee; Andre Pascal Kengne; Michel Marre; Simon Heller Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David M Nathan; Patricia A Cleary; Jye-Yu C Backlund; Saul M Genuth; John M Lachin; Trevor J Orchard; Philip Raskin; Bernard Zinman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-12-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kasia J Lipska; Joseph S Ross; Yinghui Miao; Nilay D Shah; Sei J Lee; Michael A Steinman Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Alan J Garber; Martin J Abrahamson; Joshua I Barzilay; Lawrence Blonde; Zachary T Bloomgarden; Michael A Bush; Samuel Dagogo-Jack; Ralph A DeFronzo; Daniel Einhorn; Vivian A Fonseca; Jeffrey R Garber; W Timothy Garvey; George Grunberger; Yehuda Handelsman; Irl B Hirsch; Paul S Jellinger; Janet B McGill; Jeffrey I Mechanick; Paul D Rosenblit; Guillermo E Umpierrez Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Rozalina G McCoy; Holly K Van Houten; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Nilay D Shah; Robert A Wermers; Steven A Smith Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2013 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Kasia J Lipska; E Margaret Warton; Elbert S Huang; Howard H Moffet; Silvio E Inzucchi; Harlan M Krumholz; Andrew J Karter Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Denise E Bonds; Michael E Miller; Richard M Bergenstal; John B Buse; Robert P Byington; Jeff A Cutler; R James Dudl; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; Angela R Kimel; Byron Hoogwerf; Karen R Horowitz; Peter J Savage; Elizabeth R Seaquist; Debra L Simmons; William I Sivitz; Joann M Speril-Hillen; Mary Ellen Sweeney Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-01-08
Authors: David M Nathan; Margaret Bayless; Patricia Cleary; Saul Genuth; Rose Gubitosi-Klug; John M Lachin; Gayle Lorenzi; Bernard Zinman Journal: Diabetes Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Jennifer E Clark; Kasey R Boehmer; Maggie Breslin; Shanzay Haider; Weronika Pasciak; Derek Gravholt; Brianna B Sanchez; Sandra A Hartasanchez; Omar M El Kawkgi; Victor Montori; Kasia J Lipska Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2021-11-08
Authors: Anastasia-Stefania Alexopoulos; Anna R Kahkoska; Virginia Pate; Marie C Bradley; Joshua Niznik; Carolyn Thorpe; Til Stürmer; John Buse Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-11-01