| Literature DB >> 28824580 |
Gordon T Taylor1, Elizabeth A Suter1, Zhuo Q Li1, Stephanie Chow1, Dallyce Stinton1, Tatiana Zaliznyak1, Steven R Beaupré1.
Abstract
A new method to measure growth rates of individu<span class="Chemical">al photoautotrophic cells by combining stable isotope probing (SIP) and single-cell resonance Raman microspe<span class="Chemical">ctrometry is introduced. This report explores optimal experiment<span class="Chemical">al design and the theoretical underpinnings for quantitative responses of Raman spectra to cellular isotopic composition. Resonance Raman spectra of isogenic cultures of the cyanobacterium, Synechococcus sp., grown in 13C-bicarbonate revealed linear covariance between wavenumber (cm-1) shifts in dominant carotenoid Raman peaks and a broad range of cellular 13C fractional isotopic abundance. Single-cell growth rates were calculated from spectra-derived isotopic content and empirical relationships. Growth rates among any 25 cells in a sample varied considerably; mean coefficient of variation, CV, was 29 ± 3% (σ/[Formula: see text]), of which only ~2% was propagated analytical error. Instantaneous population growth rates measured independently by in vivo fluorescence also varied daily (CV ≈ 53%) and were statistically indistinguishable from single-cell growth rates at all but the lowest levels of cell labeling. SCRR censuses of mixtures prepared from Synechococcus sp. and T. pseudonana (a diatom) populations with varying 13C-content and growth rates closely approximated predicted spectral responses and fractional labeling of cells added to the sample. This approach enables direct microspectrometric interrogation of isotopically- and phylogenetically-labeled cells and detects as little as 3% changes in cellular fractional labeling. This is the first description of a non-destructive technique to measure single-cell photoautotrophic growth rates based on Raman spectroscopy and well-constrained assumptions, while requiring few ancillary measurements.Entities:
Keywords: Raman microspectrometry; carbon fixation; carotenoids; intraspecific trait variability; photosynthesis; productivity; single-cell analysis; stable isotope probing
Year: 2017 PMID: 28824580 PMCID: PMC5541042 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01449
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Examples of resonance Raman spectra obtained from EUBMIX-hybridized (Cy3) Synechococcus sp. (RS9916) cells (0.5–1.8 μm in diameter) pictured in fluorescence (Y3 ET, k—545 excitation/610 emission) (A) and bright-field (B) images. Cells manually targeted in the microscope field by the computer mouse are numbered, then automatically revisited under laser illumination for Raman interrogation. (C) Single-cell spectrum i was obtained from a culture grown on natural 13C abundances (fmedia = 0.011 DI13C). Single-cell spectra ii–v were obtained from a culture in f/2 media augmented with 2 mM bicarbonate yielding a final fractional 13C-content of 54% (0.54 fmedia) after 3 (ii), 6 (iii), 12 (iv), and 24 (v) days of incubation. Vertical lines denote major peak positions in the control culture. Spectra were baseline-corrected, intensities normalized from 0 to 1, and smoothed using standard Renishaw™ Wire 4.1® routines.
Figure 2Examples of the varying contributions of 12C=12C, 12C=13C, and 13C=13C isotopologues to the shape, position, and areas of the ν (C = C) Raman spectral peak for carotenoids of cells assimilating varying amounts of DI13C. Each Raman spectrum was obtained from individual cells grown in either 0.011 fmedia (A) or 0.54 fmedia for 3 (B), 6.2 (C), or 9.2 (D) days. Spectra were subjected to local baseline subtraction (1,360–1,660 cm−1), intensity normalization (0–1), and a full Voigt curve-fitting routine (convolution of Lorentzian and Gaussian profiles) with 5,000 iterations or a 0.00001 tolerance using Renishaw™ Wire 4.1® software. Center positions for each of the three isotopologues were constrained within narrow consensus ranges (± 1 cm−1) determined from regression coefficients presented in Figure 5. Isotopologue peak widths and symmetries were allowed to float to optimize curve fits.
Figure 3Example of growth-dependent variations in the relative proportions of ν (12C=12C) (A), ν (12C=13C) (B), and ν (13C=13C) (C) isotopologue bond peak areas to the total ν (C = C) Raman peak area at ~1,521 cm−1 for carotenoids in Synechococcus sp. (RS9916) cells grown in 0.32 fmedia. Boxes represent the interquartile range (25–75th percentiles) for peak areas in spectra from 25 ± 3 individual cells. Internal horizontal lines, whiskers, and circles are medians, 10 to 90th, and 5 to 95th percentiles for all observations, respectively. Solid curves are hyperbolic fits to all observations (N = 250 cells). Broken lines are responses predicted from arguments presented in SM 2 and SM 3, particularly Equations (S11, S20).
Figure 5Quantitative responses of mean SCRR wavenumbers of the three dominant carotenoid peaks to varying cellular fractional labeling (fcell) for all fmedia (0.011–0.54) throughout exponential growth phase (0–18 days). Symbols and vertical error bars represent mean SCRR wavenumber observations ± 1 S.D., respectively. Horizontal error bars represent uncertainties propagated in calculating fcell (see SM ). Solid lines are empirical least squares linear regressions through individual data points (N = 836 cells). Dotted lines define the 99% confidence intervals of each slope (b1); (A) ν (C = C), (B) ν (C-C), and (C) δ (C = CH).
Figure 4Examples of growth-dependent shifts in mean wavenumbers of the major carotenoid resonance Raman spectral peaks as Synechococcus sp. (RS9916) cells grown in 0.32 fmedia compared with 0.011 fmedia controls. Generations (n) were calculated from generation times (g) presented in Figure S1 and incubation times (n = t/g). Box and whisker plot details are as described in Figure 3. Solid curves are hyperbolic fits to all observations (N = 325 cells). Dashed lines are theoretical predictions for a population isotopically equilibrating with its media based on wavenumber response to fcell and generation time (see SM ). Solid horizontal lines are least square means of all observations in control samples. Peak assignments are (A) ν (C = C), (B) ν (C-C), and (C) δ (C = CH).
Analytical precision of single-cell resonance Raman spectral features assessed from 150 Synechococcus sp. (RS9916) continuously cells grown at natural 13C abundances (fmedia = 0.011).
| Minimum | 52.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1002.6 | 1155.1 | 1520.2 |
| Maximum | 100 | 47.1 | 4.6 | 1006.1 | 1157.2 | 1522.4 |
| Mean | 89.0 | 10.1 | 1.0 | 1004.4 | 1156.3 | 1521.1 |
| 8.9 | 9.4 | 1.0 | 0.65 | 0.29 | 0.34 | |
| %CV | 9.9 | 93.0 | 97.9 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| 99% C.I. | ±1.9 | ±2.0 | ±0.2 | ±0.14 | ±0.06 | ±0.07 |
%CV = coefficient of variation = standard deviation × 100/mean.
99% confidence intervals.
Variability in major wavenumber positions (cm−1) for carotenoid peaks in photosynthetic microorganisms grown under natural stable isotope abundances.
| β-carotene | 1,518 | 1,157 | 1,010 | Marshall and Marshall ( |
| 1,517 | 1,156 | 1,004 | Li et al. ( | |
| 1,522 | 1,158 | 1,006 | Li et al. ( | |
| 1,521 | 1,156 | 1,006 | This study | |
| Prokaryote Mean | 1519.9 | 1156.5 | 1005.3 | |
| 2.8 | 1.1 | 0.9 | ||
| %CV | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.09 | |
| Arctic “AMA” microalgae | 1,524 | 1,157 | 1,003 | Li et al. ( |
| 1,526 | 1,157 | 1,010 | This study | |
| 1,526 | 1,156 | 1,010 | This study | |
| 1,525 | 1,156 | 1,011 | This study | |
| 1,527 | 1,158 | 1,009 | This study | |
| Eukaryote Mean | 1525.6 | 1156.6 | 1008.5 | |
| 1.2 | 0.9 | 3.2 | ||
| %CV | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.32 | |
| ANOVA | 0.006 | 0.905 | 0.250 | |
Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of variance comparing prokaryotic and eukaryotic values. p-values exceeding 0.05 indicate no statistical difference between data sets.
Figure 6Temporal variations in single-cell growth rates (μsc) calculated from SCRR peak positions and daily population growth rates (μpop,inst–diamonds) based on in vivo fluorescence measurements (Figure S1) for cultures incubated in fmedia = 0.32 (A) and 0.43 (B), and Bland and Altman (1986) plot comparing results from both methods and treatments (C). See Materials and Methods for calculations. Box and whisker plot details are as described in Figure 3. Shaded boxes represent single-cell growth rates (μsc) and open boxes represent daily population growth rates (μpop,inst) at tx−1, tx, and tx+1. Horizontal broken line is mean μpop over entire exponential growth phase (0–18 days). (C) Differences between μsc and μpop,inst compared to their mean values to assess their agreement. Broken horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence intervals (±1.96 standard deviations).
Figure 7SCRR of an artificial assemblage constructed of known concentrations of Synechococcus sp. populations with distinct fcell labeling. (A) Stacked SCRR spectra from cells 1–13. (B) Bright field image of cells 1–13 targeted for Raman interrogation in a single field superimposed with wavenumber color codes. (C) Comparison of frequency of occurrence of cells added from each fcell population (open bars) and those detected by SCRR (shaded bars).
Figure 8Bright-field image (A) and measurement of fractional labeling (B) of single cells in artificial assemblages through time. Parallel cultures of a fast-growing diatom, Thalassiosira pseudonana (μpop = 0.483 day−1) and a slow-growing cyanobacterium, Synechococcus sp. (μpop = 0.161 day−1) in labeled (fmedia = 0.48) and unlabeled (fmedia = 0.011) were subsampled through exponential growth phase, mixed, and prepared for SCRR interrogation. Values of fcell computed from SCRR peak positions and Equation (4) in individual cells are compared with fcell computed from α, fmedia, population growth measured by in vivo fluorescence, and Equation (2) (B). Solid line represents linear regression of all observations (N = 253 cells) including natural 13C abundance controls (fcell ≈ 0.0107); fcell(SCRR) = 0.005 + 0.92±0.02 fcell (fluorescence), r2 = 0.92.