| Literature DB >> 21451586 |
Rachel A Foster1, Marcel M M Kuypers, Tomas Vagner, Ryan W Paerl, Niculina Musat, Jonathan P Zehr.
Abstract
Many diatoms that inhabit low-nutrient waters of the open ocean live in close association with cyanobacteria. Some of these associations are believed to be mutualistic, where N(2)-fixing cyanobacterial symbionts provideEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21451586 PMCID: PMC3160684 DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2011.26
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISME J ISSN: 1751-7362 Impact factor: 10.302
Figure 1Blue light excitation (450–490 nm) images of field collected diatom–cyanobacteria symbioses. The diatom frustules are not easily seen under epi-fluorescence microscopy (except in d), however, the excitation patterns of the cyanobacterial symbionts are clearly different and yellow/orange from their diatom partners (red). (a) Two Hemiaulus membranaceus diatoms with two Richelia intracellularis associated to each diatom. The chlorophyll a within the chloroplast (c) of the diatom fluoresces red, whereas the pigments in the vegetative (v) cells and the terminal heterocyst (h) of Richelia fluoresce yellow–orange. (b) The apical end of a Rhizosolenia clevei diatom with two associated trichomes of R. intracellularis (c) A chain of Chaetoceros spp. diatoms with Calothrix rhizosoleniae attached to the spines (not visible). (d) A chain of Climacodium frauenfeldianum diatoms associated with yellow-fluorescing unicellular cyanobacteria (cyanobionts).
Summary of nanoSIMS analyses, cell dimensions and estimates of N2 fixation rates and growth rates
| 3 | 0.3789 | 4.22 × 103 | 0.22 | |||
| Heterocyst 1 | 1 | 0.3726 | 164 | 21.0 | ||
| Vegetative | 0.5 | 1 | 0.3790 | 8.72 | 0.22 | |
| Heterocyst 2 | 1 | 0.3812 | 37.4 | |||
| Vegetative | 1 | 0.3806 | 16.4 | 0.23 | ||
| 3 | 0.3651 | 3.49 × 103 | 0.06 | |||
| Heterocyst | 1 | 1 | 0.3761 | 102 | 5.88 | |
| Vegetative | 2 | 0.3607 | 8.32 | 0.05 | ||
| 4 | 0.3759 | 1.87 × 103 | 0.10 | |||
| Heterocyst | 1 | 1 | 0.3764 | 85.1 | 8.94 | |
| Vegetative | 2 | 0.3737 | 15.5 | 0.09 | ||
| 0.3595 | 1.91 × 103 | 0.03 | ||||
| Heterocyst | 1 | 1 | 0.3623 | 34.3 | 2.90 | |
| Vegetative | 2 | 0.3657 | 8.62 | 0.06 | ||
| 6 | 0.4378 | 4.63 × 103 | 0.11 | |||
| Heterocyst | 1 | 0.4238 | 50.0 | 9.45 | ||
| Vegetative | 3 | 3 | 0.4362 | 6.0 | ||
| Heterocyst | 1 | 0.4508 | 45.6 | 0.10 | ||
| 8 | 0.4576 | 4.23 × 103 | 0.13 | |||
| Heterocyst 1 | 3 | 1 | 0.4104 | 72.3 | 10.6 | |
| Vegetative | 2 | 0.4792 | 29.6 | 0.16 | ||
| Heterocyst 2 | 1 | 0.4706 | 44.9 | |||
| 6 | 0.4523 | 4.32 × 103 | 0.12 | |||
| Heterocyst 1 | 1 | 0.4118 | 41.1 | |||
| Vegetative | 3 | 1 | 0.4951 | 11.7 | 10.3 | 0.10 |
| Heterocyst 2 | 1 | 0.4596 | 55.0 | |||
| Vegetative | 1 | 0.4485 | 13.4 | 0.11 | ||
| 12 | 5 | 0.4739 | 1.56 × 103 | 0.04 | ||
| Heterocyst | 1 | 0.4572 | 13.1 | 1.41 | ||
| 5 | 0.4519 | 1.49 × 103 | 0.04 | |||
| Heterocyst | 12 | 1 | 0.4826 | 10.4 | 1.15 | |
| Vegetative | 2 | 0.4748 | 5.77 | 0.04 | ||
| Heterocyst | 1 | 1 | 0.3570 | 35.8 | 0.17 | 0.06 |
| Vgetative | 6 | 0.3679 | 28.5 | |||
| Heterocyst | 12 | 1 | 0.4575 | 44.5 | 0.12 | |
| Vegetative | 6 | 0.7415 | 45.1 | 0.11 | ||
| 12 | 19 | 0.3561–0.4519 | 65–2.66 × 102 | 0.02–2.39 | 0.001–0.15 | |
| 3 | 0.4032 | 2.39 × 104 | ||||
| Heterocyst 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.3632 | 9.10 × 102 | ||
| Heterocyst 2 | 1 | 0.3951 | 3.17 × 102 | |||
| 3 | 0.3494 | 2.84 × 104 | ||||
| Heterocyst 1 | 1 | 0.3689 | 6.84 × 102 | |||
| Heterocyst 2 | 0 | 1 | 0.3743 | 4.37 × 102 | ||
| vegetative | 1 | 0.3617 | 2.34 × 102 | |||
| 4 | 4.4440 | 4.41 × 103 | 0.43 | |||
| Heterocyst | 24 | 1 | 1.7900 | 75.3 | 47.8 | |
| Vegetative | 2 | 4.4600 | 18.9 | 0.43 | ||
| 3 | 4.6600 | 3.12 × 103 | 0.45 | |||
| Heterocyst | 24 | 1 | 2.6810 | 71.0 | 38.7 | |
| Vegetative | 3 | 4.7430 | 27.4 | 0.46 | ||
| 6 | 4.5960 | 4.31 × 103 | 0.45 | |||
| Heterocyst 1 | 1 | 4.7068 | 38.7 | 48.7 | ||
| Vegetative | 24 | 1 | 4.7815 | 7.37 | 0.47 | |
| Heterocyst 2 | 1 | 4.9327 | 48.6 | |||
| Vegetative | 2 | 4.9693 | 28.8 | 0.49 | ||
| 4 | 3.1628 | 2.12 × 103 | 0.15 | |||
| heterocyst 1 | 1 | 3.1141 | 39.1 | 9.43 | ||
| vegetative | 48 | 2 | 3.8720 | 41.6 | 0.18 | |
| heterocyst 2 | 1 | 3.9909 | 35.8 | |||
| 3 | 3.0170 | 4.30 × 103 | 0.14 | |||
| Heterocyst | 48 | 1 | 3.4009 | 41.9 | 15.3 | |
| Vegetative | 4 | 3.5284 | 23.4 | 0.17 | ||
| 3 | 3.0506 | 4.68 × 103 | 0.14 | |||
| Heterocyst | 48 | 1 | 3.6647 | 12.1 × 101 | 16.5 | |
| Vegetative | 3 | 3.5281 | 16.6 | 0.33 | ||
| 4 | 9.7529 | 4.40 × 103 | 0.48 | |||
| Heterocyst 1 | 1 | 9.8114 | 74.0 | 50.4 | ||
| Vegetative | 76 | 1 | 10.655 | 14.0 | 0.48 | |
| Heterocyst 2 | 1 | 11.652 | 68.9 | |||
| Vegetative | 1 | 11.891 | 33.2 | 0.59 | ||
| 3 | 9.6706 | 4.33 × 103 | 0.48 | |||
| Heterocyst | 76 | 1 | 3.1086 | 94.8 | 49.2 | |
| Vegetative | 1 | 9.0384 | 41.6 | 0.44 | ||
| 12 | 0.3593 | nm | ||||
| Heterocyst 1 | 1 | 0.3056 | 11.9 | |||
| Vegetative | 0 | 13 | 0.3339 | 29.6 | ||
| Heterocyst 2 | 1 | 0.3417 | 15.6 | |||
| Vegetative | 5 | 0.3398 | 44.0 | |||
| 3 | 7.6500 | 2.17 × 104 | 0.38 | |||
| Heterocyst 1 | 1 | 4.3552 | 91.3 | 71.5 | ||
| Vegetative | 76 | 3 | 7.0634 | 67.0 | 0.35 | |
| Heterocyst 2 | 1 | 6.5394 | 70.9 | |||
| Vegetative | 10 | 6.9387 | 66.7 | 0.32 | ||
| 0 | 2 | 0.3797 | nm | |||
| 4 | 0.3710 | 55.9 | ||||
| 76 | 11 | 3.1657 | 1.56 × 105 | 6.03 | 0.37 | |
| 28 | 5.3341 | 65.4 | 1.62 | 0.26 | ||
Abbreviations: AT%, atom percent; FL, free living (non-symbiotic); nanoSIMS, nanometer scale secondary ion mass spectrometry; nm, not measured; ROIs, regions of interests.
N2 fixation rates were normalized by number of N2-fixing cell.
Figure 2The images of 15N/14N ratios are shown for symbiont-containing Hemiaulus. The 15N/14N ratio is shown for Hemiaulus–Richelia symbioses at time 0 (a), 30 min (b) and 48 h (c). Inset panels a–c are the epi-fluorescent images taken before the nanoSIMS analyses. The numbers and markings in the figure define regions of interest, which were used for calculating 15N/14N ratios. Scale bars are 5 μm.
Figure 3The images of 15N/14N ratios are shown for Chaetoceros-Calothrix and the Climacodium-cyanobiont symbioses. The 15N/14N ratio is shown in A and C for Chaetoceros–Calothrix and the Climacodium–Crocosphaera symbioses, respectively. Note the ‘hotspots' (white arrows) of enrichment within the individual cyanobiont (Crocosphaera) cells of Climacodium (c). The corresponding total ion content images images for the same symbioses in a and c are shown in b and d, respectively. The numbers and markings in the Figure define regions of interest, which were used for calculating 15N/14N ratios. Scale bars are 5 μm.
Figure 4Summary of results from nanoSIMS analysis. (a) The atom % of the 15N/14N ratios for ROIs of individual Hemiaulus–Richelia are shown as a function of incubation time in both long and short-term experiments. (b) The atom % of the 15N/14N ratios for ROIs of individual Hemiaulus–Richelia symbioses from the short-term experiments and represents the values within the red box shown in a. Note that the Richelia enrichment values are given as ratios estimated in the heterocyst and the vegetative cells. The dashed red line indicates the value for a co-occurring non-symbiotic diatom.