Literature DB >> 28824325

Impacts of CCL4 gene polymorphisms on hepatocellular carcinoma susceptibility and development.

Bin Wang1, Ying-Erh Chou2,3, Ming-Yu Lien4,5, Chen-Ming Su6, Shun-Fa Yang3,7, Chih-Hsin Tang4,8.   

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer globally and the third most common cause of cancer mortality. In Taiwan, HCC is the second leading cause of cancer death. CCL4 (C-C chemokine ligand 4), is a macrophage inflammatory protein with a chief effect in inflammation and immune-regulation, and was documented in cancer progression by promoting instability in the tumor environment. Polymorphisms in chemokine genes help to determine host-pathogen interactions that influence chemokine levels. We investigated the effects of CCL4 gene polymorphisms on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) disease progression in a cohort of Taiwanese patients. We recruited total of 1,546 participants in current study, including 1,200 healthy control and 346 patients with HCC. Three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the CCL4 gene were examined by a real-time PCR. We found that the A/G homozygotes of CCL4 rs10491121 polymorphism reduced the risks for HCC. On the other hand, AG and GA haplotypes of 2 CCL4 SNPs (rs1049112 and rs171915) also reduced the risks for HCC by 0.025 and 0.515 fold, respectively. The present report is the first time to examine the risk factors associated with CCL4 SNPs in HCC progression in Taiwan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CCL4; HCC; SNP; Susceptibility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28824325      PMCID: PMC5562195          DOI: 10.7150/ijms.19620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Sci        ISSN: 1449-1907            Impact factor:   3.738


Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer globally and the third most common cause of cancer mortality 1, 2. In Taiwan, HCC is the second leading cause of cancer death 3, 4. The development of HCC is a complex, multistep pathological process, mediated by liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV), alcohol consumption, and hereditary factors 4-6. Polymorphisms in chemokine genes help to determine host-pathogen interactions that influence chemokine levels. A variety of polymorphisms have been identified in either the coding or non-coding regions of chemokine genes. Thus, genetic polymorphism plays an important role in determining susceptibility and resistance to HCC 7. The CC chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein-1β (MIP-1β/CCL4) is located on chromosome 17 (q11-q21) and is involved in immune responses produced by specific cells triggered by antigens or mitogenic signals and attract additional cells 8, 9. High CCL4 levels in the serum of cirrhotic patients indicate the presence of HCC 10. We therefore investigated the effects of CCL4 gene polymorphisms on the risk of HCC disease progression in a cohort of Taiwanese patients. CCL4 gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) influence gene expression, protein function and disease susceptibility in particular individuals 11, 12. SNP had potential predictive significance risk of HCC in previous studies 13, 14. However, little is known about the association between CCL4 SNPs, HCC risk and disease progression. We therefore evaluated the diagnostic potential of three CCL4 SNPs as candidate biomarkers for susceptibility to HCC.

Materials and Methods

Participants

We enrolled 346 patients presenting with HCC to the Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taiwan, during the period 2007 through 2015. The 1200 anonymous healthy controls (HCs) were randomly selected from the Taiwan Biobank. All participants were Han Chinese. HCC patients were clinically staged at the time of diagnosis according to the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system, which incorporates tumor morphology, number of lymph nodes affected, and metastases 15. Each study participant provided informed written consent and completed a structured questionnaire on sociodemographic characteristics, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption. Liver cirrhosis was diagnosed with a liver biopsy, CT and magnetic MRI, or biochemical evidence of liver parenchymal damage with endoscopic esophageal or gastric varices. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chung Shan Medical University Hospital prior to study commencement.

Selection of CCL4 polymorphisms

We selected the non-synonymous SNPs rs1634507 (in the promoter region; ID: C_7451708_10), rs10491121 (ID: C_11626804_10), and rs1719153 (3'UTR; ID: C_12120537_10) (Applied Biosystems) for this study. The rs1719153 CCL4 SNP has previously been found to modify HIV infection susceptibility and disease progression 16.

Genomic DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood specimens using QIAamp DNA blood mini kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNA was dissolved in TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA; pH 7.8) and stored at -20°C.

Real-time PCR

The allelic discrimination of the CCL4 SNPs were assessed with the ABI StepOne™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and analyzed with SDS v3.0 software (Applied Biosystems) using the TaqMan assay 17, 18.

Statistical Analyses

Chi-square analysis was used to confirm that the genotype distribution of each SNP was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). A Mann-Whitney U-test and a Fisher's exact test were used to compare demographic characteristics distributions between HCs and HCC patients. The correlation between genotype frequencies, clinicopathologic characteristics and HCC cancer risk were examined by adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), after controlling for other covariates. The statistical analysis about haplotype was according to previously study 19. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed using SAS statistical software (Version 9.1, 2005; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

No significant differences were found in terms of demographic characteristics between with the HCC patients and HCs (Table 1). Similarly, no significant differences existed between these two groups in regard to age (p = 0.114), gender (p = 0.261) or tobacco consumption (p = 0.493).
Table 1

The distributions of demographical characteristics and clinical parameters in 1200 controls and 346 patients with HCC.

VariableControls (N=1200)Patients (N=346)p value
Age (yrs)
≤60557 (46.4%)144 (41.6%)p = 0.114
>60643 (53.6%)202(58.4%)
Gender
Male840 (70.0%)253 (73.1%)p = 0.261
Female360 (30.0%)93 (26.9%)
Alcohol consumption
No1030 (85.8%)217 (62.7%)p <0.001
Yes170 (14.2%)129 (37.3%)
Tobacco consumption
No728 (60.7%)203 (58.7%)p = 0.493
Yes471 (39.3%)143 (41.3%)
HBsAg
Negative1054 (87.8%)202 (58.4%)p<0.001
Positive146 (12.2%)144 (41.6%)
Anti-HCV
Negative1147 (95.6%)185 (53.5%)
Positive53 (4.4%)161 (46.5%)
AST (IU/L)26.2 ± 13.3131.4 ± 286.2p<0.001
ALT (IU/L)26.7 ± 22.4111.3 ± 224.3p<0.001
AFP (ng/mL)3.86 ± 14.622967.9 ± 14659.8p = 0.0002
Stage
I+II230 (66.5%)
III+IV116 (33.5%)
Tumor T status
≤T2233 (67.3%)
>T2113 (32.7%)
Lymph node status
N0336 (97.1%)
N1+N210 (2.9%)
Metastasis
M0328 (94.8%)
M118 (5.2%)
vascular invasion
No283 (87.8%)
Yes63 (18.2%)
Whereas the serum levels of the common clinical pathological markers of HCC, α-Fetoprotein (AFP), aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) 20, were normal in HCs, levels were elevated in HCC patients. At baseline, 170 HCs (14.2%) and 129 HCC patients (37.3%) self-reported alcohol consumption (p <0.001). In the HCC cohort, 230 patients (66.5%) had stage I/II HCC and 116 (33.5%) had stage III/IV disease. To reduce the possible interference of confounding variables, AORs with 95% CIs were estimated by multiple logistic regression models after controlling for alcohol consumption, HBV and HCV infection in each comparison. Genotype distributions of SNPs rs1634507, rs10491121 and rs1719153 are presented in Table 2. In the HCs, all genotypic frequencies were in HWE (p > 0.05). In both HCs and HCC patients, the highest distribution frequencies for the rs1634507, rs10491121, and rs1719153 genes were, respectively, homozygous for C/C, heterozygous for A/G, and homozygous for A/A (Table 2). After adjusting for confounders, subjects with A/G homozygotes of the CCL4 rs10491121 polymorphism had a 0.665-fold (95% CI: 0.458-0.966; p < 0.05) significantly lower risk of developing HCC compared to those with A/A homozygotes. There were no significant differences in the incidences of HCC patients with the rs1634507 and rs1719153 polymorphisms compared to HCs.
Table 2

Distribution frequency of CCL4 genotypes in 1200 controls and 346 patients with HCC.

VariableControls (N=1200) n (%)Patients (N=346) n (%)OR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI)
rs1634507
CC575 (47.9%)167 (48.3%)1.001.00
AC517 (43.1%)148 (42.8%)0.986 (0.767-1.267)0.971 (0.699-1.347)
AA108 (9.0%)31 (8.9%)0.988 (0.640-1.527)1.078 (0.618-1.881)
AC+AA625 (52.1%)179 (51.7%)0.986 (0.776-1.253)0.989 (0.725-1.350)
rs10491121
AA295 (24.6%)103 (29.8%)1.001.00
AG609 (50.8%)152 (43.9%)0.715 (0.537-0.952)*0.665 (0.458-0.966)*
GG296 (24.6%)91 (26.3%)0.880 (0.636-1.218)0.822 (0.536-1.260)
AG+GG905 (75.4%)243 (70.2%)0.769 (0.590-1.003)0.716 (0.506-1.013)
rs1719153
AA556 (46.3%)174 (50.3%)1.001.00
AT532 (44.3%)141 (40.8%)0.847 (0.658-1.090)0.857 (0.617-1.190)
TT112 (9.4%)31 (8.9%)0.884 (0.574-1.363)0.776 (0.452-1.332)
AT+TT644 (53.7%)172 (49.7%)0.853 (0.672-1.084)0.840 (0.616-1.146)

The odds ratios (ORs) and with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by logistic regression models. The adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by multiple logistic regression models after controlling for alcohol consumption, HBsAg, and HCV. * p value < 0.05 as statistically significant

No significant differences were found between the levels of AFP, AST, ALT or the AST/ALT ratio and the CCL4 polymorphisms in HCC patients (Table 3).
Table 3

Association of CCL4 genotypic frequencies with HCC laboratory status.

Characteristicα-Fetoprotein a (ng/mL)AST a(IU/L)ALT a(IU/L)AST/ALT ratio a
rs1634507
CC2857.4 ± 1166.4162.3 ± 30.0136.0 ± 23.01.51 ± 0.14
AC+AA3071.0 ± 1069.2102.7 ± 9.888.2 ± 9.01.45 ± 0.08
p value0.8930.0600.0540.727
rs10491121
AA3112.5 ± 1681.9149.0 ± 30.0128.8 ± 27.31.53 ± 0.19
AG+GG2906.6 ± 869.1124.0± 17.9103.9 ± 12.71.46 ± 0.08
p value0.9140.4590.4080.726
rs1719153
AA2755.6 ± 1120.0159.5 ± 28.8132.8 ± 22.01.51 ± 0.13
AT+TT3182.7 ± 1111.9103.0 ± 10.289.5 ± 9.41.46 ± 0.08
p value0.7870.0650.0720.748

Mann-Whitney U test was used between two groups. a Mean ± S.E.

An analysis of distribution frequencies of CCL4 rs10491121 and rs1719153 haplotypes revealed that the most common haplotype in HCs was A/A (40.2%), which was therefore selected as the reference. After controlling for alcohol consumption, HBV and HCV infection, the A/T CCL4 haplotype significantly reduced the risk of HCC disease progression by 0.025-fold (95% CI: 0.007-0.093), while the G/A CCL4 haplotype significantly reduced the risk by 0.515-fold (95% CI: 0.387-0.686) (Table 4). The interaction effect between alcohol consumption and CCL4 haplotypes on HCC disease progression is shown in Table 5. The G/A haplotype was significantly more frequent among HCC patients than among HCs, both in non-drinkers (21.9% vs 18.3%, respectively; p = 0.0009) and drinkers (23.3% vs 11.7%; p < 0.001). Among the drinkers in the HCC cohort, those with the G/A haplotype had a 8.172-fold (95% CI:4.862-13.734) greater risk of HCC disease progression compared to those with the A/A, A/T, or G/T haplotypes, in analyses that adjusted for HBV and HCV infection (Table 5).
Table 4

Frequencies of CCL4 haplotypes in HCC patients and control subjects.

Haplotype blockControlsPatients
rs10491121 A/Grs1719153 A/Tn = 2400n = 692OR (95% CI)AOR (95% CI)a
Global haplotype test (P < 0.001)
AA964 (40.2%)355 (51.3%)1.001.00
AT235 (9.8%)3 (0.4%)0.035 (0.011-0.109)b0.025 (0.007-0.093)c
GA680 (28.3%)134 (19.4%)0.535 (0.429-0.668)d0.515 (0.387-0.686)e
GT521 (21.7)200 (28.9%)1.042 (0.851-1.278)0.988 (0.756-1.290)

a Adjusting for the effects of alcohol consumption, HBsAg, and HCV

b P < 0.001

c P < 0.001

d P < 0.001

e P < 0.001

Table 5

Combined effect of alcohol consumption and CCL4 haplotypes on HCC development.

Alcohol consumptionCCL4 haplotypeControlsPatientsAOR (95% CI)b
n = 2400n = 692
YesG-A43 (2.5%)73 (13.0%)8.172 (4.862-13.734)c
YesOthersa198 (11.7%)131 (23.3%)2.725 (1.942-3.822)c
NoG-A310 (18.3%)123 (21.9%)1.720 (1.248-2.370)d
NoOthersa1145 (67.5%)235 (41.8%)1.000 (reference)

a Other haplotypes included A-A, A-T, and G-T

b Adjusting for the effects of HBsAg, and HCV

c P < 0.001

d P = 0.0009

Discussion

The chemokine CCL4 plays a key role in many cancer cell types 21-23. For instance, CCL4 increases invasion and migration of prostate cancer cells through regulation of the integrin pathway 24. Recent evidence also suggests that CCL4 promotes tumor growth and angiogenesis 25. In contrast, a high level of CCL4 expression correlates with a more favorable prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, which suggests that CCL4 may recruit tumor infiltrating CD8+ T lymphocytes and thus affect the cancer microenvironment 26. Previous studies have indicated that the A/T haplotype and T alleles of rs1719153 occurring in CCL4 SNPs are more frequently expressed in HCs than in patients with HIV-1 infection 16, 27. To the best of our knowledge, this current study is the first to investigate the distribution of the rs1634507, rs10491121 and rs1719153 SNPs and their possible association with susceptibility to HCC. We also examined the associates of these CCL4 SNPs combined with environmental carcinogens, leading to a susceptibility to HCC. In analyses adjusting for confounding factors, the rs10491121 A/G homozygous polymorphism was associated with a significantly lower risk of developing HCC compared to with the rs10491121 A/A homozygous polymorphism (95% CI: 0.458-0.966; p < 0.05). It has been reported that the CCL4 rs1634507 polymorphism in promoter regions is not associated with HIV infection, although it is associated with more rapid progression of acquired immune deficiency syndrome 27. The CCR5 is specific receptor of CCL4 28. Therefore, the gene variants could enhance CCL4 expression, increasing the interaction with more CCR5 receptors, promoting their internalization, and hence supporting entry restriction of HIV-1 R5 strains 27. On the other hand, the CCL4 production from monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells and tumor-infiltrating granulocyte recruit high numbers of regulatory T cells (Tregs) through CCR5 receptor in melanoma and lymphoma 29. CCL4 induced tumor growth through regulation of antitumor immune responses by a network of MDSCs and Tregs within the tumor microenvironment. Tumor microenvironments impact on disease progression, response to therapy and prognosis 30. Gene polymorphisms may enhance CCL4 expression and inhibit antitumor immunity in the tumor microenvironment. Although the functional importance of the CCL4 SNP is not examined in this study, a relationship with the risk of HCC is initiated based on the locations of the examined variants. The linkage disequilibrium (LD) express across the human genome. Therefore, the LD could be used as genetic markers to locate adjacent variants that participate to detection and treatment of disease. Otherwise, the haplotype analyses can provide the contribution to the susceptibility of disease 31. We evaluated impacts of different haplotype combinations of 2 CCL4 SNPs (rs1049112 and rs171915) to the risk of HCC and eventually found that the AT and GA haplotype showed a low risk for HCC. It is possible that the AT and GA haplotypes of CCL4 are in LD with other functional polymorphisms that are responsible for the susceptibility to HCC. It has been reported that CCL4 secretion by CD4+- antigen-presenting cell APC complexes, which correlated with increased cross-priming of CCR5-expressing CD8+ T lymphocytes 32. Then CD8+ T lymphocytes exit the draining lymph node and migrate to the tumor site, where they exert their cytotoxic function on cancer cells. High levels of CCL4 in the ESCC patients predicted prolonged survival. CDR5+CD8+ T lymphocytes were recruited by CCL4 into ESCC lesions 26. Whether CCL4 polymorphism recruit different T lymphocyte subsets increasing anti-tumor immunity, which benefits the inhibition of tumor growth are needs further examination. The current study provides novel insights into CCL4 SNPs in regard to HCC susceptibility and disease progression. However, we dose not recruited the survival results of HCC patients. Future research could evaluate the association of CCL4 polymorphisms with survival of HCC patients. Furthermore, it would be advisable to collect data on a larger number of patients for analysis of the functions of CCL4 polymorphisms in HCC. In summary, this study provides evidence supporting an association between CCL4 polymorphisms and HCC risk. CCL4 polymorphisms may therefore serve as a useful prognosis marker for HCC treatment.
  31 in total

1.  CCL4 as an adjuvant for DNA vaccination in a Her2/neu mouse tumor model.

Authors:  T Nguyen-Hoai; M Pham-Duc; M Gries; B Dörken; A Pezzutto; J Westermann
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 5.987

2.  A highly significant association between a COMT haplotype and schizophrenia.

Authors:  Sagiv Shifman; Michal Bronstein; Meira Sternfeld; Anne Pisanté-Shalom; Efrat Lev-Lehman; Avraham Weizman; Ilya Reznik; Baruch Spivak; Nimrod Grisaru; Leon Karp; Richard Schiffer; Moshe Kotler; Rael D Strous; Marnina Swartz-Vanetik; Haim Y Knobler; Eilat Shinar; Jacques S Beckmann; Benjamin Yakir; Neil Risch; Naomi B Zak; Ariel Darvasi
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Genetic variation in the CCL18-CCL3-CCL4 chemokine gene cluster influences HIV Type 1 transmission and AIDS disease progression.

Authors:  William S Modi; James Lautenberger; Ping An; Kevin Scott; James J Goedert; Gregory D Kirk; Susan Buchbinder; John Phair; Sharyne Donfield; Stephen J O'Brien; Cheryl Winkler
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Screening and detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Heather N Simpson; Brendan M McGuire
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 6.126

Review 5.  Hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Alejandro Forner; Josep M Llovet; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Influence of tumour micro-environment heterogeneity on therapeutic response.

Authors:  Melissa R Junttila; Frederic J de Sauvage
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Tumor-infiltrating monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells mediate CCR5-dependent recruitment of regulatory T cells favoring tumor growth.

Authors:  Eva Schlecker; Ana Stojanovic; Christian Eisen; Christian Quack; Christine S Falk; Viktor Umansky; Adelheid Cerwenka
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Transient Surface CCR5 Expression by Naive CD8+ T Cells within Inflamed Lymph Nodes Is Dependent on High Endothelial Venule Interaction and Augments Th Cell-Dependent Memory Response.

Authors:  David Askew; Charles A Su; Deborah S Barkauskas; R Dixon Dorand; Jay Myers; Rachel Liou; Joseph Nthale; Alex Y Huang
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  An acute bleeding metastatic spinal tumor from HCC causes an acute onset of cauda equina syndrome.

Authors:  Chih-Ying Wu; Hsiang-Ming Huang; Der-Yang Cho
Journal:  Biomedicine (Taipei)       Date:  2015-08-23

10.  Serpin peptidase inhibitor (SERPINB5) haplotypes are associated with susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Shun-Fa Yang; Chao-Bin Yeh; Ying-Erh Chou; Hsiang-Lin Lee; Yu-Fan Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  8 in total

1.  Association of gene and protein expression and genetic polymorphism of CC chemokine ligand 4 in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Levar Shamoun; Kalle Landerholm; Amanda Balboa Ramilo; Roland E Andersson; Jan Dimberg; Dick Wågsäter
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Correlation between CCL4 gene polymorphisms and clinical aspects of breast cancer.

Authors:  Gui-Nv Hu; Huey-En Tzeng; Po-Chun Chen; Chao-Qun Wang; Yong-Ming Zhao; Yan Wang; Chen-Ming Su; Chih-Hsin Tang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Association of Resistin Gene Polymorphisms with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression and Development.

Authors:  Wei-Hung Yang; Shoou-Jyi Wang; Yung-Sen Chang; Chen-Ming Su; Shun-Fa Yang; Chih-Hsin Tang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Chemokine C-C Motif Ligand 4 Gene Polymorphisms Associated with Susceptibility to Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Shu-Jui Kuo; Chien-Chung Huang; Chun-Hao Tsai; Horng-Chaung Hsu; Chen-Ming Su; Chih-Hsin Tang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The Association of CCL4 rs1634507 and rs10491121 Polymorphisms with Susceptibility of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma in an Iranian Population: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Hamideh Kadeh; Mohammad Eyni; Maliheh Parsasefat; Ebrahim Miri-Moghaddam
Journal:  Iran J Pathol       Date:  2022-02-20

6.  Corylin Suppresses Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression via the Inhibition of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, Mediated by Long Noncoding RNA GAS5.

Authors:  Chi-Yuan Chen; Chin-Chuan Chen; Tzong-Ming Shieh; Chuen Hsueh; Shu-Huei Wang; Yann-Lii Leu; Jang-Hau Lian; Tong-Hong Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Impact of matrix metalloproteinase-11 gene polymorphisms upon the development and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Chin-Jung Hsu; Hsiang-Lin Lee; Chia-Hsuan Chou; Chen-Ming Su; Shun-Fa Yang; Chih-Hsin Tang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Impact of CCL4 gene polymorphisms upon the progression of lung cancer in a Han Chinese cohort.

Authors:  Weiwei Hu; Szu-Yu Chien; Pengqing Ying; Po-I Liu; Chen-Ming Su; Chih-Hsin Tang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.889

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.