| Literature DB >> 27221742 |
Shun-Fa Yang1,2, Chao-Bin Yeh3,4, Ying-Erh Chou2,5, Hsiang-Lin Lee1,6, Yu-Fan Liu7,8.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The serpin peptidase inhibitor SERPINB5 is a tumour-suppressor gene that promotes the development of various cancers in humans. However, whether SERPINB5 gene variants play a role in HCC susceptibility remains unknown. In this study, we genotyped 6 SNPs of the SERPINB5 gene in an independent cohort from a replicate population comprising 302 cases and 590 controls. Additionally, patients who had at least one rs2289520 C allele in SERPINB5 tended to exhibit better liver function than patients with genotype GG (Child-Pugh grade A vs. B or C; P = 0.047). Next, haplotype blocks were reconstructed according to the linkage disequilibrium structure of the SERPINB5 gene. A haplotype "C-C-C" (rs17071138 + rs3744941 + rs8089204) in SERPINB5-correlated promoter showed a significant association with an increased HCC risk (AOR = 1.450; P = 0.031). Haplotypes "T-C-A" and "C-C-C" (rs2289519 + rs2289520 + rs1455555) located in the SERPINB5 coding region had a decreased (AOR = 0.744; P = 0.031) and increased (AOR = 1.981; P = 0.001) HCC risk, respectively. Finally, an additional integrated in silico analysis confirmed that these SNPs affected SERPINB5 expression and protein stability, which significantly correlated with tumour expression and subsequently with tumour development and aggressiveness. Taken together, our findings regarding these biomarkers provide a prediction model for risk assessment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27221742 PMCID: PMC4879545 DOI: 10.1038/srep26605
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
The distributions of demographical characteristics and clinical parameters in 590 controls and 302 patients with HCC.
| Variables | Controls (N = 590) | Patients (N = 302) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs) | Mean ± S.D. | Mean ± S.D. | |
| 50.11 ± 14.97 | 63.01 ± 11.78 | ||
| Gender | n (%) | n (%) | |
| Male | 483 (81.9%) | 213 (70.5%) | |
| Female | 107 (18.1%) | 89 (29.5%) | |
| Alcohol consumption | |||
| No | 378 (64.1%) | 191 (63.2%) | |
| Yes | 212 (35.9%) | 111 (36.8%) | |
| Tobacco consumption | |||
| No | 367 (62.2%) | 179 (59.3%) | |
| Yes | 223 (37.8%) | 123 (40.7%) | |
| Stage | |||
| I + II | 198 (65.6%) | ||
| III + IV | 104 (34.4%) | ||
| Tumor T status | |||
| ≤T2 | 202 (66.9%) | ||
| >T2 | 100 (33.1%) | ||
| Lymph node status | |||
| N0 | 293 (97.0%) | ||
| N1 + N2 | 9 (3.0%) | ||
| Metastasis | |||
| M0 | 285 (94.4%) | ||
| M1 | 17 (5.6%) | ||
| Vascular invasion | |||
| No | 256 (84.8%) | ||
| Yes | 46 (15.2%) | ||
†Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher’s exact test was used between controls and patients with HCC.
Distribution frequency of SERPINB5 genotypes in 590 controls and 302 patients with HCC.
| Variables | Controls (N = 590) n (%) | Patients (N = 302) n (%) | OR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs17071138 | ||||
| TT | 476 (80.7%) | 228 (75.5%) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| TC | 107 (18.1%) | 70 (23.2%) | 1.366 (0.972–1.919) | 1.367 (0.904–2.068) |
| CC | 7 (1.2%) | 4 (1.3%) | 1.193 (0.346–4.117) | 0.832 (0.181–3.834) |
| TC + CC | 114 (19.3%) | 74 (24.5%) | 1.355 (0.972–1.890) | 1.330 (0.887–1.992) |
| rs3744941 | ||||
| CC | 244 (41.4%) | 125 (41.4%) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| CT | 272 (46.1%) | 151 (50.0%) | 1.084 (0.808–1.453) | 1.209 (0.849–1.721) |
| TT | 74 (12.5%) | 26 (8.6%) | 0.686 (0.418–1.126) | 0.687 (0.387–1.216) |
| CT + TT | 346 (58.6%) | 177 (58.6%) | 0.999 (0.754–1.323) | 1.081 (0.773–1.511) |
| rs8089104 | ||||
| CC | 166 (28.1%) | 94 (31.1%) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| CT | 275 (46.6%) | 150 (49.7%) | 0.963 (0.698–1.329) | 1.161 (0.791–1.703) |
| TT | 149 (25.3%) | 58 (19.2%) | 0.687 (0.463–1.020) | 0.696 (0.433–1.118) |
| CT + TT | 424 (71.9%) | 208 (68.9%) | 0.866 (0.640–1.172) | 0.990 (0.692–1.418) |
| rs2289519 | ||||
| CC | 234 (39.7%) | 123 (40.7%) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| CT | 276 (46.8%) | 140 (46.4%) | 0.965 (0.716–1.300) | 0.970 (0.680–1.384) |
| TT | 80 (13.5%) | 39 (12.9%) | 0.927 (0.597–1.441) | 1.056 (0.625–1.785) |
| CT + TT | 356 (60.3%) | 179 (59.3%) | 0.957 (0.721–1.269) | 0.989 (0.707–1.382) |
| rs2289520 | ||||
| GG | 293 (49.7%) | 169 (56.0%) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| GC | 242 (41.0%) | 122 (40.4%) | 0.874 (0.655–1.166) | 0.774 (0.547–1.095) |
| CC | 55 (9.3%) | 11 (3.6%) | 0.347 (0.177–0.681)* | 0.247 (0.113–0.543)* |
| GC + CC | 297 (50.3%) | 133 (44.0%) | 0.776 (0.588–1.026) | 0.666 (0.477–0.929)* |
| rs1455555 | ||||
| AA | 180 (30.5%) | 85 (28.1%) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| AG | 295 (50.0%) | 149 (49.4%) | 1.070 (0.773–1.480) | 1.190 (0.807–1.754) |
| GG | 115 (19.5%) | 68 (22.5%) | 1.252 (0.843–1.860) | 1.278 (0.795–2.055) |
| AG + GG | 410 (69.5%) | 217 (71.9%) | 1.121 (0.825–1.522) | 1.215 (0.842–1.753) |
The odds ratios (ORs) and with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by logistic regression models. The adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by multiple logistic regression models after controlling for age, gender, and tobacco and alcohol consumption. *P value < 0.05 as statistically significant.
Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of clinical status and SERPINB5 rs2289520 genotypic frequencies in 302 HCC patients with tobacco consumption.
| Variables | Genotypic frequencies | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG (N = 169) | GC + CC (N = 133) | OR (95% CI) | ||
| Clinical Stage | ||||
| Stage I/II | 114 (67.5%) | 84 (63.2%) | 1.00 | |
| Stage III/IV | 55 (32.5%) | 49 (36.8%) | 1.209 (0.750–1.948) | |
| Tumor size | ||||
| ≦T2 | 118 (69.8%) | 84 (63.2%) | 1.00 | |
| >T2 | 51 (30.2%) | 49 (36.8%) | 1.350 (0.834–2.185) | |
| Lymph node metastasis | ||||
| No | 162 (95.9%) | 131 (98.5%) | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 7 (4.1%) | 2 (1.5%) | 0.353 (0.072–1.730) | |
| Distant metastasis | ||||
| No | 156 (92.3%) | 129 (97.0%) | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 13 (7.7%) | 4 (3.0%) | 0.372 (0.118–1.169) | |
| Vascular invasion | ||||
| No | 141 (83.4%) | 115 (86.5%) | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 28 (16.6%) | 18 (13.5%) | 0.788 (0.415–1.497) | |
| Child–Pugh grade† | ||||
| A | 122 (72.2%) | 109 (82.0%) | 1.00 | |
| B or C | 47 (27.8%) | 24 (18.0%) | 0.527 (0.328–0.996) | |
| HBsAg | ||||
| Negative | 107 (63.3%) | 70 (52.6%) | 1.00 | |
| Positive | 62 (36.7%) | 63 (47.4%) | 1.553 (0.978–2.466) | |
| Anti–HCV | ||||
| Negative | 79 (46.7%) | 77 (57.9%) | 1.00 | |
| Positive | 90 (53.3%) | 56 (42.1%) | 0.638 (0.404–1.009) | |
| Liver cirrhosis | ||||
| Negative | 30 (17.8%) | 35 (26.3%) | 1.00 | |
| Positive | 139 (82.2%) | 98 (73.7%) | 0.604 (0.348–1.049) | |
The ORs with analyzed by their 95% CIs were estimated by logistic regression models. >T2 indicated the multiple tumor more than 5 cm or tumor involving a major branch of the portal or hepatic vein(s). *P value < 0.05 as statistically significant.
†Child-Pugh grades indicate the severity of cirrhosis: A = 5–6 points, B = 7–9 points and C = 10–15 points.
The estimated haplotype frequencies of six examined polymorphisms in SERPINB5 gene and the corresponding risk for HCC.
| Block 1 | Controls (N = 1180) n (%) | Patients (N = 604) n (%) | OR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs17071138 T/C | rs3744941 C/T | rs8089104 C/T | ||||
| T | C | C | 505 (42.8%) | 256 (42.4%) | Reference | |
| T | T | T | 417 (35.4%) | 196 (32.5%) | 0.927 (0.739–1.163) | 0.514 |
| T | C | T | 137 (11.6%) | 68 (11.2%) | 0.979 (0.706–1.358) | 0.899 |
| C | C | C | 102 (8.6%) | 75 (12.4%) | 1.450 (1.039–2.025) | 0.029 |
| Others# | 19 (1.6%) | 9 (1.5%) | 0.934 (0.417–2.095) | 0.869 | ||
| Block 2 | Controls (N = 1180) n (%) | Patients (N = 604) n (%) | OR (95% CI) | |||
| rs2289519 T/C | rs2289520 G/C | rs1455555 A/G | ||||
| T | G | A | 343 (29.1%) | 186 (30.8%) | Reference | |
| T | C | A | 332 (28.1%) | 134 (22.2%) | 0.744 (0.569–0.974) | 0.031 |
| C | G | A | 264 (22.4%) | 127 (21.0%) | 0.887 (0.673–1.170) | 0.396 |
| T | G | G | 167 (14.2%) | 89 (14.7%) | 0.983 (0.719–1.344) | 0.913 |
| C | C | G | 54 (4.6%) | 58 (9.6%) | 1.981 (1.313–2.989) | 0.001 |
| Others# | 20 (1.6%) | 10 (1.7%) | 0.922 (0.423–2.011) | 0.838 | ||
#Block 1 Others: CCT (18; control: 16; patient: 2), CTT (3; control: 3; patient: 0), TTC (6; control: 0; patient: 6), CTC (1; control: 0; patient: 1).
#Block 2 Others: CCA (23; control: 15; patient: 8), CAG (5; control: 5; patient: 0), TCG (2; control: 0; patient: 2).
Figure 1Exon, intron, gene features and SNPs analysed of the human SERPINB5 (NM_002639.4).
(a) Exons are indicated by the filled blue boxes and are numbered from 1 to 8 from chromosome positions chr18:61,144,144 to 61,172,318 (reference genome GRCh37.p13). The lower panel shows population-specific heterozygosity frequencies of these polymorphisms in the East Asian population. SNPs are indicated by black arrows and labelled with the SNP ID number. (b) Expanded view of ENCODE data for the promoter block containing rs3744941 and rs17071138 using UCSC genome browser. The H3K4Me1, H3K4Me3, and H3K27Ac tracks show the genome-wide levels of enrichment of the mono-methylation of lysine-4, tri-methylation of lysine-4, and acetylation of lysine-27 of H3 histone protein, respectively, as determined by the ChIP-seq assays. Chromatin State Segmentation track displays chromatin state segmentation by integrating ChIP-seq data using a HMM for HepG2 HCCs. Chromatin state regions predicted for the promoters and transcribed are highlighted with red and green, respectively. DNase cluster tracks show DNase hypersensitivity areas. Tnx Factor tracks show transcription factor binding to DNA based on ChIP-seq and CpG islands. (c) +1 represents the transcription initiation site of the SERPINB5 and is highlighted in blue font. Consensus residues of the core P53 (RRRCWWGYYY N[0–13] RRRCWWGYYY) are indicated with red fonts, where R denotes A or G, W denotes A or T, and Y denotes C or T. The putative BACH2 binding site indicated with an underline and the position of selective SNPs revealed with bold font. (d) Motif logo of the BACH2.p2 consensus sequence from the SIB EPD. (e) Regulatory annotations of SNPs within the LD blocks containing SERPINB5 rs3744941. Multiple regulatory motifs were predicted to be affected.
Figure 2Structural characterization of human SERPINB5.
(a) The selected variant regions between rs2289519 and rs2289520 of five maspin-like proteins including human (NP_002630.2), mouse (NP_033283.1), rat (NP_476449.1), chicken (XP_418986.3) and frog (NP_001011282.1) using a truncated multiple sequence format. The secondary structure of SERPINB5 is shown above the alignment, and the numbering is based on the human SERPINB5. Arrows represent β-strands and cylinders indicates α-helices. (b) Schematic representation of the overall human SERPINB5 protein. Domain symbols are drawn approximately to scale. The rectangles represent the key secondary structures [s2C (yellow) and s3C (pink)] that provided stabilizing interactions with the RCL (green). The positions of rs2289519, rs2289520 and rs1455555 are indicated by asterisks. (c) Ribbon diagram (ViewerLite 5.0) showing he 3D structure of human SERPINB5 (PDB accession number: 1XQG). The N-terminal and C-terminal ends are indicated with N’ and C’, respectively. The purple sphere indicated the Cα carbon of the germline variants characterized in this study. (d) Protein stability estimation of SERPINB5 SNP haplotype variation using a structure-based approach. The free energy of the protein is a weighted sum of the van der Waals, solvation, hydrogen bonding, and backbone-dependent statistical energies.