Caddy N Hobbs1, Gordon Holzberg1, Akira S Min1, R Mark Wightman1,2. 1. Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States. 2. Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States.
Abstract
Spreading depolarizations (SD) are pathophysiological phenomena that spontaneously arise in traumatized neural tissue and can promote cellular death. Most investigations of SD are performed in the cortex, a brain region that is susceptible to these depolarizing waves and accessible via a variety of monitoring techniques. Here, we describe SD responses in the cortex and the deep brain region of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) of the anesthetized rat with a minimally invasive, implantable sensor. With high temporal resolution, we characterize the time course of oxygen responses to SD in relation to the electrophysiological depolarization signal. The predominant oxygen pattern consists of four phases: (1) a small initial decrease, (2) a large increase during the SD, (3) a delayed increase, and (4) a persistent decrease from baseline after the SD. Oxygen decreases during SD were also recorded. The latter response occurred more often in the NAc than the cortex (56% vs 20% of locations, respectively), which correlates to denser cortical vascularization. We also find that SDs travel more quickly in the cortex than NAc, likely affected by regional differences in cell type populations. Finally, we investigate the previously uncharacterized effects of dopamine release during SD in the NAc with dopamine receptor blockade. Our results support an inhibitory role of the D2 receptor on SD. As such, the data presented here expands the current understanding of within- and between-region variance in responses to SD.
Spreading depolarizations (SD) are pathophysiological phenomena that spontaneously arise in traumatized neural tissue and can promote cellular death. Most investigations of SD are performed in the cortex, a brain region that is susceptible to these depolarizing waves and accessible via a variety of monitoring techniques. Here, we describe SD responses in the cortex and the deep brain region of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) of the anesthetized rat with a minimally invasive, implantable sensor. With high temporal resolution, we characterize the time course of oxygen responses to SD in relation to the electrophysiological depolarization signal. The predominant oxygen pattern consists of four phases: (1) a small initial decrease, (2) a large increase during the SD, (3) a delayed increase, and (4) a persistent decrease from baseline after the SD. Oxygen decreases during SD were also recorded. The latter response occurred more often in the NAc than the cortex (56% vs 20% of locations, respectively), which correlates to denser cortical vascularization. We also find that SDs travel more quickly in the cortex than NAc, likely affected by regional differences in cell type populations. Finally, we investigate the previously uncharacterized effects of dopamine release during SD in the NAc with dopamine receptor blockade. Our results support an inhibitory role of the D2 receptor on SD. As such, the data presented here expands the current understanding of within- and between-region variance in responses to SD.
Entities:
Keywords:
DC electrophysiology; Spreading depolarization; biosensors; brain trauma; dopamine; oxygen
Spreading
depolarizations (SD) are pathological events characterized
by one of the largest changes in electrophysiological activity and
extracellular ion concentrations that occur in neural tissue.[1,2] Extracellular potassium increases from ∼3.5 to over 30 mM.
Also, sodium, calcium, and chloride ions enter the cells, accompanied
by water.[3,4] These ionic imbalances lead to the release
of neurotransmitters such as glutamate, dopamine, and adenosine into
the extracellular space.[5−9] The drastic changes in the concentrations of intra- and extracellular
species during SD inflict a considerable metabolic challenge on the
tissue.The typical hemodynamic response to SD in otherwise
healthy tissue
is an increase in cerebral blood flow followed by a long-lasting decrease
below baseline.[10] The rise in blood flow
delivers oxygen and glucose, which provide energy to the metabolically
challenged tissue to restore its ion gradients.[10−13] However, a deficit in oxygen
and glucose can promote cell death by prolonging the duration of ionic
disruption and cellular swelling.[14−18] Oxygen concentration changes represent the balance
between blood flow delivery and metabolic consumption; thus, they
serve as a valuable indicator of the metabolic state of the tissue.
However, conflicting reports of oxygen concentration responses to
SD arise due to differences in experimental protocol such as anesthesia,
surgical procedures, and animal models.[12,19−23] Furthermore, differences in neurovascular microarchitecture can
affect the oxygen concentrations recorded during SD.[23]Here, we characterize interlocation variability in
oxygen responses
to SDs in the traditionally studied cortex and a deeper brain region
with dopaminergic innervation, the nucleus accumbens (NAc), of the
urethane-anesthetized rat. We employ a recently described, multimodal
sensor with subsecond resolution that is capable of simultaneously
recording oxygen, electroactive neurotransmitters, and DC potential
electrophysiology.[24] With the 5 μm
diameter and μm-spatial resolution of our sensor, we minimize
the confounding effects of tissue damage and are able to detect variance
in oxygen responses in normally perfused tissue due to spatial heterogeneity.
As distinct brain regions are differentially susceptible to SD[2,25] and have variable vascularization[26] and
cell-type populations,[27,28] we hypothesize that SD may promote
different effects in these two brain regions. Finally, we investigate
the modulatory role of dopamine on SD in the NAc with pharmacological
manipulation.
Results
Simultaneous Voltammetric
and Electrophysiology Recordings
We previously characterized
an implantable, multimodal sensor for
real-time voltammetric detection of oxygen and electroactive neurotransmitters
with simultaneous electrophysiological recordings.[24] The small dimensions (5 μm diameter) of the sensor
yield spatially and temporally resolved chemical information and allow
for minimally invasive recordings in deep brain tissue. In the traditionally
studied cortex and a deeper brain region, the NAc, we make comparative
investigations of electrophysiological and chemical changes during
SD. Both responses are recorded at a carbon-fiber working electrode
∼2–4 min after delivery of a stimulus at a defined location
3–5 mm away. The chemical signals are comprised of large current
deviations in successive cyclic voltammograms of the color plot (Figure ). Traces from the
color plot are obtained at the potentials for oxidation of dopamine
(+0.65 V on the initial positive voltage excursion) and reduction
of oxygen (−1.33 V on the negative voltage excursion). Also,
ion concentration changes occurring during SD produce large currents
that manifest after the switching potentials (SP) of the waveform
(+0.8 and −1.4 V) and at −0.1 V on the negative scan
(Q-peak) (Figure ).[24] Concomitantly recorded electrophysiological
changes confirm the occurrence of a SD for the lower two traces (Figure ). These changes
appear as a burst of neuron firing followed by silence during single-unit
recording or as a large, negative deflection of the extracellular
DC potential which slightly precedes (5–10 s) the onset of
the voltammetric signal (Figure ). SD was not achieved in the upper two traces as indicated
by the electrophysiological measures, and only minor chemical changes
were recorded in these locations.
Figure 1
Simultaneous electrophysiological and
voltammetric recordings.
Voltammetric data displayed as color plots with corresponding current
traces and electrophysiological data shown below. Red triangles indicate
time of stimulus. Vertical gray dashed line indicates onset of spreading
depolarization (SD) as determined from voltammetric signals. Horizontal
dashed lines in the color plots indicate the potential location of
currents arising from capacitive artifacts at the switching potentials
(SP, orange), surface-bound quinone moieties (Q-peak, black), oxygen
reduction (blue), and dopamine oxidation (DA, purple). Corresponding
current traces shown below the color plots. Top panel, stimulation
failed to produce SD. Lower panel, successfully induced SD. (a) Cortex
location with single-unit activity. (b) NAc location with DC electrophysiological
recordings.
Simultaneous electrophysiological and
voltammetric recordings.
Voltammetric data displayed as color plots with corresponding current
traces and electrophysiological data shown below. Red triangles indicate
time of stimulus. Vertical gray dashed line indicates onset of spreading
depolarization (SD) as determined from voltammetric signals. Horizontal
dashed lines in the color plots indicate the potential location of
currents arising from capacitive artifacts at the switching potentials
(SP, orange), surface-bound quinone moieties (Q-peak, black), oxygen
reduction (blue), and dopamine oxidation (DA, purple). Corresponding
current traces shown below the color plots. Top panel, stimulation
failed to produce SD. Lower panel, successfully induced SD. (a) Cortex
location with single-unit activity. (b) NAc location with DC electrophysiological
recordings.
SD Velocity and Induction
The distance between the
stereotaxic positions of the stimulus and recording locations were
used to calculate the SD velocity (eq ). SD waves propagate more quickly through cortical
tissue than through the ventral striatum (cortex: 2.5 ± 0.1 mm/min, n = 15 locations versus NAc: 1.5 ± 0.1 mm/min, n = 16 locations; Student’s t test, p < 0.0001; Figure a). The SD velocity did not change significantly over
successive pricks in a single location (one-way ANOVA, n = 31, F = 0.2087, p = 0.9830; Figure b). Additionally,
SDs were more likely to be elicited and propagate to our sensor in
the cortical experiments as compared to those in the NAc. If two successive
pinpricks failed to trigger SD, a KCl microinfusion was delivered
instead (first 250 mM, then 1 M). KCl microinfusions were required
in 63% of NAc locations, as opposed to only 13% of cortex locations.
Student’s t tests were performed to evaluate
for any systematic differences in the calculated SD velocity caused
by the two different methods of stimulation. In the cortex, the average
SD velocities for locations where pin pricks were used (n = 13) were not significantly different from the average velocities
for locations where KCl microinfusions were delivered (n = 2). Locations in the NAc where KCl microinfusions (n = 10) were used had significantly higher calculated average SD velocities
as compared to locations where pin pricks (n = 6)
were employed (1.7 ± 0.1 vs 1.2 ± 0.1 mm/min, Student’s t test, p = 0.0295). This difference may
be due to the KCl droplet radius shortening the distance traveled
by the SD wave or the microinfusion method more rapidly initiating
the SD. However, it does not affect the finding that SDs traveled
more quickly in the cortex than the NAc.
Figure 2
Spreading depolarization
(SD) velocity analysis. (a) Average velocities
for SD waves in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and cortex. Columns indicate
the means of the two sample sets. Mean velocities of each recording
site are plotted; NAc, squares; cortex, triangles. The velocities
are significantly different between the two brain regions (p < 0.001, two-tailed t test). (b) Velocity
changes for successive SD waves within location. The magnitude of
the velocities in a given recording location were normalized to the
first response within that location. Numbers of locations included
for each successive SD event are indicated along the x-axis. Bars indicate ± SEM.
Spreading depolarization
(SD) velocity analysis. (a) Average velocities
for SD waves in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and cortex. Columns indicate
the means of the two sample sets. Mean velocities of each recording
site are plotted; NAc, squares; cortex, triangles. The velocities
are significantly different between the two brain regions (p < 0.001, two-tailed t test). (b) Velocity
changes for successive SD waves within location. The magnitude of
the velocities in a given recording location were normalized to the
first response within that location. Numbers of locations included
for each successive SD event are indicated along the x-axis. Bars indicate ± SEM.
Successive Oxygen Responses within a Recording Location
We found that oxygen responses differed between recording sites,
but were similar for successive depolarizations within a single location.
The reproducibility across successive responses was evaluated by normalizing
the oxygen maxima during the SDs to the first response’s amplitude
within a location. The amplitude of the responses did not change significantly
over successive SDs (one-way ANOVA, n = 31, F = 0.70667, p = 0.6663). In five subjects,
oxygen responses to SD waves were recorded in two sequential sites
of the same brain region, separated by at least 0.3 mm on the DV axis
(Figure ). The oxygen
traces in Figure a–c
had some variance in magnitude, duration, and/or profile between the
two recording sites. In two subjects, the oxygen recordings for locations
separated by 0.8 and 0.5 mm were more similar (Figure d,e, respectively).
Figure 3
Oxygen traces during
successive SD waves from five animals with
two recording locations each. Color keys to the right define the order
of responses to successive SD waves, first to last, top to bottom.
Different colors (e.g., blue scale vs gray scale) signify a different
stimulus location. Dorsal-ventral depth of recording location specified
above color key. Traces within a location are temporally aligned to
the onset of depolarization. (a) Two cortical locations, separated
by 0.3 mm. (b) Two cortical locations in a different subject, separated
by 0.3 mm. (c) Two NAc locations, separated by 0.4 mm. (d) Two cortical
locations, separated by 0.8 mm. (e) Two NAc locations, separated by
0.5 mm.
Oxygen traces during
successive SD waves from five animals with
two recording locations each. Color keys to the right define the order
of responses to successive SD waves, first to last, top to bottom.
Different colors (e.g., blue scale vs gray scale) signify a different
stimulus location. Dorsal-ventral depth of recording location specified
above color key. Traces within a location are temporally aligned to
the onset of depolarization. (a) Two cortical locations, separated
by 0.3 mm. (b) Two cortical locations in a different subject, separated
by 0.3 mm. (c) Two NAc locations, separated by 0.4 mm. (d) Two cortical
locations, separated by 0.8 mm. (e) Two NAc locations, separated by
0.5 mm.The oxygen change profiles across
successive SD waves were similar
within a given location. However, a small subset of recording locations
(n = 2/31, or 6.5%) depicted variance in responses
at the same recording position for different stimulation sites (Figure ). In one recording
location, the first stimulation elicited a two-peaked oxygen increase
that began before the SD signal arrived, followed by oxygen changes
with the SD (Figure a, Site 1, black trace). In contrast, the second stimulation at the
same site evoked the pre-SD oxygen response but did not evoke SD or
its accompanying oxygen changes (Figure a, Site 1, gray dashed trace). At the same
recording position, stimulation at the second location did not evoke
pre-SD oxygen increases, but did yield the oxygen changes associated
with the SD (Site 2, blue traces, Figure a). Another location also showed differences
in the oxygen responses based on the location at which the stimulation
was delivered (Figure b). Both responses were biphasic increases, but the magnitudes and
profiles differed.
Figure 4
Oxygen traces during successive SD waves in recording
locations
where the response varied based on stimulation location. Color keys
to the right define the order of responses to successive SD waves,
first to last, top to bottom. Different colors (e.g., blue scale vs
gray scale) signify a different stimulus location. Traces for each
recording location are temporally aligned to the SD onset (vertical,
red dashed line). (a) Pinprick stimuli at Site 1 (gray scale; −0.8
mm AP, + 3.2 mm ML) elicited a two-peaked oxygen increase that arrived
in the recording location before the wave of SD (black trace) or without
a following SD wave (gray dashed trace). Pinprick stimuli at Site
2 (blue scale; −0.8 AP mm, + 0.8 mm ML) did not elicit two-peak
oxygen increase before SD. (b) Pinprick stimuli delivered in two different
locations elicited oxygen responses with varied profiles (Site 1,
gray scale, −0.8 AP mm, + 0.8 mm ML; Site 2, blue scale, −0.8
mm AP, + 3.2 mm ML).
Oxygen traces during successive SD waves in recording
locations
where the response varied based on stimulation location. Color keys
to the right define the order of responses to successive SD waves,
first to last, top to bottom. Different colors (e.g., blue scale vs
gray scale) signify a different stimulus location. Traces for each
recording location are temporally aligned to the SD onset (vertical,
red dashed line). (a) Pinprick stimuli at Site 1 (gray scale; −0.8
mm AP, + 3.2 mm ML) elicited a two-peaked oxygen increase that arrived
in the recording location before the wave of SD (black trace) or without
a following SD wave (gray dashed trace). Pinprick stimuli at Site
2 (blue scale; −0.8 AP mm, + 0.8 mm ML) did not elicit two-peak
oxygen increase before SD. (b) Pinprick stimuli delivered in two different
locations elicited oxygen responses with varied profiles (Site 1,
gray scale, −0.8 AP mm, + 0.8 mm ML; Site 2, blue scale, −0.8
mm AP, + 3.2 mm ML).
Four Types of Oxygen Changes Accompanying SD
In the
cortex and NAc of the urethane-anesthetized rat, oxygen responses
were categorized into four patterns as a function of their changes
relative to the SD (n = 31 locations). The majority
of locations (n = 19, or 61%) had an oxygen increase
during the SD (Figure a,b). These were divided into two groups—those with another
oxygen increase after the SD (11 locations, termed biphasic) and those
without (8 locations, termed monophasic). The remainder (12 locations)
showed an oxygen decrease during the SD (Figure c,d). Again, these were subdivided into those
that showed an oxygen increase after SD (10 locations, termed decrease/increase)
and those that did not (2 locations, termed decrease). The cortex
had a higher percentage of oxygen “increase” responses
(80%) as compared to the NAc (44%).
Figure 5
Representative oxygen traces and electrophysiological
recordings
from four different locations depicting the types of oxygen responses
recorded during SD. Electrophysiological recordings (gray) are displayed
below the oxygen traces (black). Red vertical dashed lines indicate
temporal boundaries of electrophysiological depolarization signals.
Roman numeral I, initial decrease in oxygen; II, main oxygen increase
peak; III, delayed increase in oxygen; IV, long-lasting decrease below
baseline. Pie charts in the upper right-hand corner of the quadrants
give the number of locations of each response type (NAc locations
in blue, cortex locations in orange). (a) Biphasic oxygen increase
with DC potential. (b) Monophasic oxygen increase with DC potential.
(c) Oxygen decrease during SD and a following increase with DC potential.
(d) Oxygen decrease during SD with single-unit activity. Because of
their rarity, no oxygen responses of this type were obtained with
DC electrophysiological recordings.
Representative oxygen traces and electrophysiological
recordings
from four different locations depicting the types of oxygen responses
recorded during SD. Electrophysiological recordings (gray) are displayed
below the oxygen traces (black). Red vertical dashed lines indicate
temporal boundaries of electrophysiological depolarization signals.
Roman numeral I, initial decrease in oxygen; II, main oxygen increase
peak; III, delayed increase in oxygen; IV, long-lasting decrease below
baseline. Pie charts in the upper right-hand corner of the quadrants
give the number of locations of each response type (NAc locations
in blue, cortex locations in orange). (a) Biphasic oxygen increase
with DC potential. (b) Monophasic oxygen increase with DC potential.
(c) Oxygen decrease during SD and a following increase with DC potential.
(d) Oxygen decrease during SD with single-unit activity. Because of
their rarity, no oxygen responses of this type were obtained with
DC electrophysiological recordings.Four phases of the oxygen response were labeled with roman
numerals
in Figure : (I) a
small initial decrease, (II) an increase occurring with the SD, (III)
a delayed increase after the SD, and (IV) a persistent decrease from
baseline after the SD. This nomenclature corresponds to the four components
of blood flow changes occurring with SD in normally perfused tissues,
examined further in the discussion.[10,29] The average
peak and trough oxygen concentrations and durations of the peaks are
given in Table (there
were no differences between brain regions). The initial dip in oxygen
concentration, Phase I, was apparent in 52% of all locations (n = 10 NAc, n = 6 cortex). However, it
was not always reproducibly present: Six of those locations had one
or more oxygen responses to SD waves that lacked Phase I. This initial
decrease was relatively small (2.4 ± 0.2 μM) compared to
the other oxygen changes (compare with values in Table ).
Table 1
Magnitude
of Changes for the Four
Types of Oxygen Responses during SDa
increase
during SD (μM)
decrease
during SD (μM)
Phase III (μM)
Phase IV (μM)
duration
of Phase II (s)
duration
of Phase III (s)
biphasic increase (n = 11)
47 ± 9
7 ± 4
–8 ± 4
48 ± 4
89 ± 9
monophasic increase (n = 8)
38 ± 7
–11 ± 2
112 ± 24
decrease/increase (n = 10)
–56 ± 10
–14 ± 3
–23 ± 3
17 ± 3
51 ± 5
decrease (n = 2)
–25 ± 12
–8 ± 3
20 ± 2
Values presented as average ±
SEM.
Values presented as average ±
SEM.
Dopamine Release and Pharmacological
Manipulation during SD
in the NAc
Recordings of SDs in the NAc were all accompanied
by a large release (13.0 ± 1.8 μM, n =
10 subjects, predrug concentrations) of dopamine that was highly reproducible
for successive SD waves within a recording location (a representative
color plot and cyclic voltammogram are shown in Figure a). To pharmacologically investigate the
possible effects of dopamine on SD, we recorded two SDs and then administered
raclopride or SCH 23390 (selective D2- and D1-receptor antagonists,
respectively) by i.p. injection (n = 5 subjects per
drug). At 45 min later, 3–4 succeeding SD episodes were evoked.
Pre- and postdrug administration averaged values were analyzed by
paired, two-tailed t tests (Figure b,c).
Figure 6
Effect of dopamine (DA) receptor antagonism
on DA release, SD velocity,
and DC potential shift in the NAc. (a) Representative color plot of
SD event with the convolution-based method waveform. (b) Average ±
SEM DA release and DC electrophysiology traces during SD waves in
a single location, before (black) and after (blue) administration
of raclopride. Inset: cyclic voltammogram from (a) at 130 s that is
identical to that for dopamine. (c) Analysis of changes in DA peak
concentration, DA decay time (t1/2), SD velocity, DC shift
magnitude, and DC shift half-width (a measure of duration) after administration
of raclopride or SCH 23390 (n = 5 animals per drug).
Significance between pre- and postdrug values was analyzed by paired,
two-tailed t tests: *p < 0.05,
**p < 0.01.
Effect of dopamine (DA) receptor antagonism
on DA release, SD velocity,
and DC potential shift in the NAc. (a) Representative color plot of
SD event with the convolution-based method waveform. (b) Average ±
SEM DA release and DC electrophysiology traces during SD waves in
a single location, before (black) and after (blue) administration
of raclopride. Inset: cyclic voltammogram from (a) at 130 s that is
identical to that for dopamine. (c) Analysis of changes in DA peak
concentration, DA decay time (t1/2), SD velocity, DC shift
magnitude, and DC shift half-width (a measure of duration) after administration
of raclopride or SCH 23390 (n = 5 animals per drug).
Significance between pre- and postdrug values was analyzed by paired,
two-tailed t tests: *p < 0.05,
**p < 0.01.The dopamine peak decay time and DC shift magnitude both
significantly
increased with D2-receptor antagonism (respectively, 13.8 ± 2.8
to 29.1 ± 5.7 s, n = 5, p =
0.035; 2.4 ± 0.2 to 4.3 ± 0.6 mV, n = 5, p = 0.032; Figure ). While SD velocity increased, it did not reach significance
(1.2 ± 0.1 to 1.7 ± 0.3 mm/min, n = 5, p = 0.057; Figure ). Also, the DC shift half-width increased with raclopride
administration, but not significantly (37.2 ± 10.0 to 50.3 ±
6.8 s, n = 5, p = 0.052; Figure ). D1-receptor antagonism
attenuated the dopamine peak magnitude (14.9 ± 2.3 to 10.6 ±
1.7 μM, p = 0.0078, n = 5; Figure ), but did not significantly
affect the SD velocity, the DC magnitude, or the DC duration.Similar experiments were conducted in the cortex. As expected,
no catecholamine signals were observed in the cortex during SD (Figure a). The cyclic voltammogram
does not resemble that for dopamine, and the remaining current is
from uncorrected interferences following the convolution-based subtraction
method (Figure b).[30] Furthermore, no significant changes were observed
in the DC potential following dopamine antagonists (Figure b,c).
Figure 7
Effect of dopamine (DA)
receptor antagonism on SD velocity and
DC potential shift in the cortex. (a) Representative color plot of
SD event in the cortex with the convolution-based method waveform.
(b) Average ± SEM trace at the oxidation potential for DA and
DC electrophysiology traces during SD waves in a single location,
before (black) and after (blue) administration of raclopride. Inset:
cyclic voltammogram from (a) at 105 s. (c) Analysis of changes in
SD velocity, DC shift magnitude, and DC shift half-width (a measure
of duration) after administration of raclopride or SCH 23390 (n = 4 animals per drug). There was no significance between
pre- and postdrug values, analyzed by paired, two-tailed t tests.
Effect of dopamine (DA)
receptor antagonism on SD velocity and
DC potential shift in the cortex. (a) Representative color plot of
SD event in the cortex with the convolution-based method waveform.
(b) Average ± SEM trace at the oxidation potential for DA and
DC electrophysiology traces during SD waves in a single location,
before (black) and after (blue) administration of raclopride. Inset:
cyclic voltammogram from (a) at 105 s. (c) Analysis of changes in
SD velocity, DC shift magnitude, and DC shift half-width (a measure
of duration) after administration of raclopride or SCH 23390 (n = 4 animals per drug). There was no significance between
pre- and postdrug values, analyzed by paired, two-tailed t tests.
Discussion
The
results presented here clearly support the utility of the multimodal
sensor that we developed to investigate the physiological and chemical
changes occurring during SD in cortical and deeper brain regions.
Two different measures of physiology were used to demonstrate that
the applied stimuli evoked SD. The DC potential was considered more
useful because of the paucity of unit firing in the anesthetized preparation
and the quantifiable nature of the DC signal. The simultaneous chemical
measures showed that the concentration changes of oxygen followed
similar patterns in the two investigated brain regions. Recordings
of dopamine in the NAc showed that its supraphysiological release
occurs with the SD and that it exerts inhibitory effects on SD through
interactions with D2 receptors.
SD Propagates More Quickly in the Cortex
than in the Ventral
Striatum
SD velocity was faster in the cortex than in the
ventral striatum (Figure a), and SDs were more likely to be initiated in the cortex
as compared to the NAc. Differences in susceptibility to SD for different
brain structures have been well documented,[2,25] and
SD velocity has been correlated to a region’s susceptibility
to SD.[31] Variation in inherent excitability
of neurons is one cause of contrasting vulnerability.[32] Brisson and Andrew[33] proposed
another: differing efficacy of Na+-K+-ATPase
pumps between neuronal populations. Additionally, astrocytes impede
SD propagation by clearing the extracellular space of potassium ions
and glutamate.[6,34] Accordingly, regions with higher
densities of astrocytes have slower velocity SD waves.[35] The higher density of astrocytes in the NAc
as compared the cortex[36] likely is partially
responsible for the decreased susceptibility and propagation speed
of SD found in that region.
Oxygen Responses Are Highly Similar within
Locations and Variable
between Locations
Oxygen concentration serves as a marker
of the balance between blood flow and metabolism, which dictates the
outcome of tissue health. However, the use of different anesthetics[37,38] and surgical procedures that alter physiological responsivity[39,40] have yielded inconsistent reports of blood flow and oxygen concentration
changes[12,19,20,22] during SD waves. To obviate these complications,
we used a minimally invasive sensor to characterize oxygen changes
in multiple locations in both the NAc and cortex of the urethane-anesthetized
rat.Oxygen responses accompanying successive SD events were
reproducible (Figure ), as previously reported for SDs in otherwise healthy tissue.[12,19,41] The magnitudes of these responses
(Table ) are similar
to reported basal concentrations of oxygen,[42] indicating that oxygen concentrations could be approximately doubled
or decreased to near zero during SD. These massive alterations in
oxygen content emphasize the supraphysiological nature of SD.Because of the high temporal and spatial resolution of FSCV at
microelectrodes, our data further the current understanding of SD.
First, our findings confirm previous reports of spatial heterogeneity
of oxygen availability, as indirectly measured by NADH fluorescence.[23] In three subjects with two recording locations
within the same brain region, different oxygen profiles were recorded
in sites separated by 300–400 μm (Figure a–c); but, similar oxygen responses
were recorded in the pairs of sites from two subjects (Figure d,e). Second, our oxygen recordings
expand upon the finding of Brennan and colleagues[43] that dilatation of vessels in the cortex both preceded
the SD and occurred in areas that the SD never reached—through
a phenomenon known as distinct vascular conduction. This phenomenon
would yield recordings like those in Figure a (a NAc location), where there is a reproducible
change in oxygen both occurring ahead of the SD and in the absence
of a SD. Furthermore, different stimulation locations yielded dissimilar
oxygen changes for one recording site (Figure b). Though we cannot differentiate between
the effects of different “upstream” neural networks
or vasculature affecting the oxygen responses through cellular metabolism
or vascular capacity, these data provide new evidence for heterogeneous
responses to SD.
SD Waves Evoke Oxygen Increases and Decreases
in Both the Cortex
and NAc
The four-component scheme of blood flow changes during
SD recently reviewed by Ayata and Lauritzen is well established,[10] and we used it to evaluate the different stages
of our recorded oxygen traces (Figure ): Phase I, initial dip; Phase II, main increase; Phase
III, delayed increase; Phase IV, fall below baseline. Further, we
designated four patterns of oxygen changes based on the presence and
magnitude of these Phases: biphasic increase, monophasic increase,
decrease/increase, and decrease (Figure ). In the following discussion of the four
profiles of recorded oxygen changes, we consider both underlying blood
flow and metabolism alterations.A period of hyperperfusion
is reported to occur in normally perfused tissues during SD,[10−13,44] and would cause an increase in
oxygen (Phase II). We hypothesize that the locations with oxygen decreases
during SD received oxygen-depleted blood[23] or had metabolic consumption that surpassed the increase in blood
flow. The decrease in oxygen began simultaneously with the maximal
depolarization signal, or the voltage plateau of the electrophysiological
DC shift (Figure c).
This coincides with the greatest disruption in ion gradients, when
ion pumps must consume energy in order to restore the membrane potential.
Interestingly, 56% of NAc locations were designated as decreases,
whereas only 20% of cortical locations were (Figure ). This difference correlates with the generally
larger diameter vessels and denser capillary vascularization in the
cortex compared to deeper brain regions.[45,46] Additionally, most (94%) NAc locations exhibited a second oxygen
increase (Phase III), as opposed to 40% of cortical locations (Figure ). Traces with Phase
III are consistent with recordings demonstrating a delayed blood flow
increase.[10,29,44] The longer
duration of the oxygen increase for the monophasic increase response
type suggests that Phase II and III may have presented as one peak
for these locations (Table ).
High Levels of Extracellular Dopamine during
SD Lowers Threshold
of Propagation
SD initiation and propagation depend on critical
thresholds being reached[2] for extracellular
potassium, glutamate, and other species involved in neuronal excitability
and depolarization.[3,4,47−50] These critical thresholds may be affected by dopamine, which exerts
inhibitory and excitatory effects through the D2 and D1 receptors,
respectively.[27,51,52] Early investigations in the striatum employed chronoamperometry
to provide evidence suggesting that dopamine release was evoked during
SD.[7,53] Recently this assignment was verified using
a very fast microdialysis technique.[9] The
modified FSCV procedure used in this work allows subsecond dopamine
detection with simultaneous electrophysiology recording.[24] Here, we provide insight on dopamine’s
role in SD by investigating the effect of dopamine receptor blockade
on dopamine release and uptake dynamics as well as DC potential changes.D1-receptor antagonism decreased the peak dopamine concentration
(Figure ), consistent
with blocking the excitatory effects of D1 activation. This indicates
that under certain circumstances it is possible to modulate the amount
of neurotransmitter released during SD. D2-receptor antagonism increased
the dopamine peak decay time (Figure ), in agreement with the effect of blocking the receptor’s
inhibitory autoreceptor function.[52] Also
following D2-receptor antagonism, the amplitude of the DC shift increased.
We hypothesize that blocking D2 receptors increases the amount of
inward cation flux during depolarization.[54] Alternatively, D2-receptor blockade may reveal the dual effects
of D1-receptor activation, increasing hyperpolarizing potassium currents,
but also increasing neuronal excitability once the neuron is depolarized
sufficiently.[51,54] Thus, the resting membrane potentials
of neurons would be held at a more negative potential with respect
to the extracellular space; then, during SD, they would undergo a
larger change in membrane potential, or depolarization, producing
a larger magnitude DC shift. The increase in SD velocity under D2-receptor
antagonism (not significant, p = 0.057; Figure ) also supports an
inhibitory effect through D2-receptor activation, which may be another
contributing factor to the slower SD velocity recorded in the NAc
(Figure a).
Conclusions
Here, we investigated chemical and physiological changes during
SD in normally perfused brain tissue. The high spatial resolution
of FSCV allowed characterization of various oxygen responses to SD
and they corresponded to well-documented blood flow changes. We identified
four main response types for locations in both the cortex and NAc,
defined by an increase or decrease in oxygen during the SD and by
the presence or absence of a delayed oxygen increase peak following
the SD. Interestingly, responses in the cortex were predominantly
increases; whereas oxygen changes in the NAc were more evenly divided
between increases and decreases. These findings may indicate that
the vasculature of the deep brain is less able to deliver adequate
oxygen to tissue during SD; however, higher metabolic demand in the
NAc cannot be discounted as another possible explanation.With
the chemical specificity and temporal resolution afforded
FSCV, we were able to probe the effects of dopamine during SD in the
deep brain. A supraphysiological release of dopamine accompanied the
depolarization signal for all recordings in NAc locations. Blockade
of D1-receptors reduced the maximum amount of dopamine released during
SD, establishing that attenuation of neurotransmitter release is possible
during these “all-or-nothing” events. Additionally,
D2-receptor antagonism increased the dopamine decay time and DC shift
magnitude, which supports an inhibitory effect of this dopamine receptor
on SD.
Methods
Chemicals
All
chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich
(St. Louis, MO), unless otherwise specified.
Animal Care and Stereotactic
Surgery
All techniques
were carried out in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care
and Use Committee of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Experiments were performed in male Sprague–Dawley rats (350–550
g) anesthetized by a 1.5 g/kg intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of
50/50% w/v urethane in bacteriostatic 0.9% NaCl (Hospira Inc., Lake
Forest, IL). The animals were placed in a stereotaxic frame and holes
were drilled through the skull for insertion of the carbon-fiber electrode
and Ag/AgCl reference. Three additional holes were drilled 3–5
mm away from the recording location for access to stimulate waves
of SD. Coordinates used are in mm anterior-poster (AP), medial-lateral
(ML), and dorsal-ventral (DV) with reference to bregma (Paxinos and
Watson, 2007). The carbon-fiber working electrode was placed either
in the NAc (+2.2 AP, +1.7 ML, −6.9 to −7.4 mm DV) or
in the motor cortex (+2.2 AP, +1.7 ML, −0.8 to −2.1
mm DV). The Ag/AgCl electrode was placed in the contralateral hemisphere
and secured with a stainless steel screw. The extra holes for stimulations
were located at −0.8 AP, +0.8 ML; −0.8 AP, +3.2 ML;
and −2.8 AP, +1.7 ML.
Experimental SD
SD-inducing stimuli
were delivered
at 20 min intervals, 3–5 mm away from the recording site, using
either mechanical damage (pinpricks) or delivery of high concentrations
of KCl. Hypodermic needles (27 and 22 G) were used to deliver pinpricks
to the same depth as the carbon-fiber electrode placement. A 10 μL
Hamilton syringe connected to a 33 G infusion needle (Plastics One
Inc., Roanoke, VA) was used to manually microinject 2 μL of
KCl dissolved in deionized water. Concentrations of 0.25 and 1 M KCl
were employed, using the lowest concentration that reliably elicited
SD.Pharmacological investigation of dopamine’s effects
were performed by i.p. injection of raclopride or SCH 23390 (n = 10 NAc, n = 8 cortex, one drug per
location per animal). Two control responses to SD were obtained, followed
by 2–4 responses 45 min after drug injection.
Simultaneous
Electrochemical and Electrophysiological Data Acquisition
Combined fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FSCV) and electrophysiological
data acquisition has been previously described.[24,55] Briefly, voltage applied to and current recorded at the carbon-fiber
microelectrode were managed by the HDCV (High Definition Cyclic Voltammetry,
UNC-Chapel Hill, NC, USA) software program. Two different waveforms
were used in this study. The “oxygen waveform” simultaneously
detects oxygen and dopamine and was used in 16 NAc and 15 cortex locations
across 26 rats (in five rats, the electrode was lowered to a second
recording location in the same brain region as the first, n = 2 NAc and n = 3 cortex). The waveform
was scanned at 400 V/s from 0 to +0.8 V then to −1.4 V before
returning to the holding potential of 0 V. A different waveform[24,30] was used to measure dopamine changes and the effects of blocking
the dopamine receptors on SD propagation and DC potential changes.
The waveform has a 1.5 ms potential step from −0.4 to −0.3
V preceding a triangle scan at 400 V/s from −0.4 to +1.3 V
and back to −0.4 V. The potential step serves to determine
the impedance of the carbon-fiber microelectrode immediately before
each waveform application. In-house software (UNC-Chapel Hill) written
in LabVIEW (National Instruments, Austin, TX) performs the subtraction
of the convolution-based impedance changes. Single-unit action potentials
or DC potential recordings were made in the 180 ms between applications
of the voltammetric waveform.
Voltammetric Verification
and Calibration
Hobbs et
al. describe the verification and calibration techniques employed.[24] An air-impermeable flow-injection analysis system
was used to determine the electrodes’ (∼75 μm
exposed carbon fiber) post-experiment sensitivity to oxygen and dopamine.
The oxygen waveform has a sensitivity of 1.12 nA/μM for dopamine
at its oxidative peak (+0.65 V) and −0.3 nA/μM for oxygen
at its reductive peak (−1.33 V). Sensitivity for dopamine on
the convolution-based triangle waveform is 7.95 nA/μM.
Data Analysis
Statistical tests were performed in Prism
4 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA), and p <
0.05 was considered significant. Grubbs’ test was used to determine
outliers.Digitizer and Offline Sorter software (Plexon, Dallas,
TX) were used to analyze single-unit electrophysiology recordings.
DC electrophysiological recordings were analyzed with an in-house
MATLAB (Natick, MA) script (Electronics Department, UNC-Chapel Hill).[24]SD velocity was calculated by dividing
the distance between the
stimulation and recording sites by the difference in time between
the stimulation and onset of the voltammetric SD signal (vertical,
gray dashed lines in Figure ) at the carbon-fiber recording electrode (eq ).The distances between stimulation
and recording
sites were obtained from the difference in stereotaxic coordinates.
The velocities of successive SDs for a given recording site were averaged,
and the means of the NAc and cortex sites were compared by a two-tailed
Student’s t test. SD velocity over successive
waves was assessed by normalizing within-site values to the first
SD. The normalized velocities of successive pricks across all recording
sites were then grouped and analyzed by ANOVA.Oxygen traces
were analyzed for maxima and minima. Peak magnitude,
decay-time (t1/2), and half-width analyses
for dopamine traces and DC potentials were performed in Clampfit (Molecular
Devices, LLC). Within-subject comparisons of these values before and
after pharmacological treatment were compared via two-tailed, paired
Student’s t tests. Averaged values are expressed
as mean ± SEM.
Authors: Jens P Dreier; Thomas Isele; Clemens Reiffurth; Nikolas Offenhauser; Sergei A Kirov; Markus A Dahlem; Oscar Herreras Journal: Neuroscientist Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 7.519
Authors: R M Dijkhuizen; J P Beekwilder; H B van der Worp; J W Berkelbach van der Sprenkel; K A Tulleken; K Nicolay Journal: Brain Res Date: 1999-09-04 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Anna M Belle; Catarina Owesson-White; Natalie R Herr; Regina M Carelli; R Mark Wightman Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 4.418