Literature DB >> 28815767

Gut microbiota of a long-distance migrant demonstrates resistance against environmental microbe incursions.

Alice Risely1, David Waite2, Beata Ujvari1, Marcel Klaassen1, Bethany Hoye1,3.   

Abstract

Migratory animals encounter suites of novel microbes as they move between disparate sites during their migrations, and are frequently implicated in the global spread of pathogens. Although wild animals have been shown to source a proportion of their gut microbiota from their environment, the susceptibility of migrants to enteric infections may be dependent upon the capacity of their gut microbiota to resist incorporating encountered microbes. To evaluate migrants' susceptibility to microbial invasion, we determined the extent of microbial sourcing from the foraging environment and examined how this influenced gut microbiota dynamics over time and space in a migratory shorebird, the Red-necked stint Calidris ruficollis. Contrary to previous studies on wild, nonmigratory hosts, we found that stint on their nonbreeding grounds obtained very little of their microbiota from their environment, with most individuals sourcing only 0.1% of gut microbes from foraging sediment. This microbial resistance was reflected at the population level by only weak compositional differences between stint flocks occupying ecologically distinct sites, and by our finding that stint that had recently migrated 10,000 km did not differ in diversity or taxonomy from those that had inhabited the same site for a full year. However, recent migrants had much greater abundances of the genus Corynebacterium, suggesting a potential microbial response to either migration or exposure to a novel environment. We conclude that the gut microbiota of stint is largely resistant to invasion from ingested microbes and that this may have implications for their susceptibility to enteric infections during migration.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gut microbiota; host-microbe interactions; microbial biology; migration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28815767     DOI: 10.1111/mec.14326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  14 in total

1.  The intestinal environment as an evolutionary adaptation to mouthbrooding in the Astatotilapia burtoni cichlid.

Authors:  Josh J Faber-Hammond; Kaitlin P Coyle; Shannon K Bacheller; Cameron G Roberts; Jay L Mellies; Reade B Roberts; Suzy C P Renn
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.194

2.  Interspecific comparison of the fecal microbiota structure in three Arctic migratory bird species.

Authors:  Hyunjun Cho; Won Young Lee
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Meta-transcriptomics reveals a diverse antibiotic resistance gene pool in avian microbiomes.

Authors:  Vanessa R Marcelino; Michelle Wille; Aeron C Hurt; Daniel González-Acuña; Marcel Klaassen; Timothy E Schlub; John-Sebastian Eden; Mang Shi; Jonathan R Iredell; Tania C Sorrell; Edward C Holmes
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 7.431

4.  Considerations for studying transmission of antimicrobial resistant enteric bacteria between wild birds and the environment on intensive dairy and beef cattle operations.

Authors:  Kristin Tormoehlen; Yvette J Johnson-Walker; Emily W Lankau; Maung San Myint; John A Herrmann
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Composition and Drivers of Gut Microbial Communities in Arctic-Breeding Shorebirds.

Authors:  Kirsten Grond; Jorge W Santo Domingo; Richard B Lanctot; Ari Jumpponen; Rebecca L Bentzen; Megan L Boldenow; Stephen C Brown; Bruce Casler; Jenny A Cunningham; Andrew C Doll; Scott Freeman; Brooke L Hill; Steven J Kendall; Eunbi Kwon; Joseph R Liebezeit; Lisa Pirie-Dominix; Jennie Rausch; Brett K Sandercock
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Microbial environment shapes immune function and cloacal microbiota dynamics in zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata.

Authors:  H Pieter J van Veelen; Joana Falcão Salles; Kevin D Matson; Marco van der Velde; B Irene Tieleman
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2020-06-03

7.  Cloacal swabs and alcohol bird specimens are good proxies for compositional analyses of gut microbial communities of Great tits (Parus major).

Authors:  Kasun H Bodawatta; Katerina Puzejova; Katerina Sam; Michael Poulsen; Knud A Jønsson
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2020-03-17

8.  Structure and membership of gut microbial communities in multiple fish cryptic species under potential migratory effects.

Authors:  My Hanh Le; Daryi Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Sustained RNA virome diversity in Antarctic penguins and their ticks.

Authors:  Michelle Wille; Erin Harvey; Mang Shi; Daniel Gonzalez-Acuña; Edward C Holmes; Aeron C Hurt
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 10.  Prospective Views for Whey Protein and/or Resistance Training Against Age-related Sarcopenia.

Authors:  Yuxiao Liao; Zhao Peng; Liangkai Chen; Yan Zhang; Qian Cheng; Andreas K Nüssler; Wei Bao; Liegang Liu; Wei Yang
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.