Literature DB >> 33499970

Microbial environment shapes immune function and cloacal microbiota dynamics in zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata.

H Pieter J van Veelen1,2, Joana Falcão Salles3, Kevin D Matson4, Marco van der Velde3, B Irene Tieleman3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relevance of the host microbiota to host ecology and evolution is well acknowledged. However, the effect of the microbial environment on host immune function and host microbiota dynamics is understudied in terrestrial vertebrates. Using a novel experimental approach centered on the manipulation of the microbial environment of zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata, we carried out a study to investigate effects of the host's microbial environment on: 1) constitutive immune function, 2) the resilience of the host cloacal microbiota; and 3) the degree to which immune function and host microbiota covary in microbial environments that differ in diversity.
RESULTS: We explored immune indices (hemagglutination, hemolysis, IgY levels and haptoglobin concentration) and host-associated microbiota (diversity and composition) in birds exposed to two experimental microbial environments differing in microbial diversity. According to our expectations, exposure to experimental microbial environments led to differences related to specific antibodies: IgY levels were elevated in the high diversity treatment, whereas we found no effects for the other immune indices. Furthermore, according to predictions, we found significantly increased richness of dominant OTUs for cloacal microbiota of birds of the high diversity compared with the low diversity group. In addition, cloacal microbiota of individual females approached their baseline state sooner in the low diversity environment than females in the high diversity environment. This result supported a direct phenotypically plastic response of host microbiota, and suggests that its resilience depends on environmental microbial diversity. Finally, immune indices and cloacal microbiota composition tend to covary within treatment groups, while at the same time, individuals exhibited consistent differences of immune indices and microbiota characteristics.
CONCLUSION: We show that microbes in the surroundings of terrestrial vertebrates can influence immune function and host-associated microbiota dynamics over relatively short time scales. We suggest that covariation between immune indices and cloacal microbiota, in addition to large and consistent differences among individuals, provides potential for evolutionary adaptation. Ultimately, our study highlights that linking environmental and host microbiotas may help unravelling immunological variation within and potentially among species, and together these efforts will advance the integration of microbial ecology and ecological immunology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avian microbiota; Ecological immunology; Host-microbiota interactions; Microbial environment; Microbiota dynamics

Year:  2020        PMID: 33499970      PMCID: PMC7807698          DOI: 10.1186/s42523-020-00039-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Microbiome        ISSN: 2524-4671


  70 in total

1.  Does clutch size evolve in response to parasites and immunocompetence?

Authors:  T E Martin; A P Møller; S Merino; J Clobert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Environmental proxies of antigen exposure explain variation in immune investment better than indices of pace of life.

Authors:  Nicholas P C Horrocks; Arne Hegemann; Stéphane Ostrowski; Henry Ndithia; Mohammed Shobrak; Joseph B Williams; Kevin D Matson; B I Tieleman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  A place for host-microbe symbiosis in the comparative physiologist's toolbox.

Authors:  Kevin D Kohl; Hannah V Carey
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test.

Authors:  Pedro R Peres-Neto; Donald A Jackson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Repeatability and individual correlates of microbicidal capacity of bird blood.

Authors:  B Irene Tieleman; Elsemiek Croese; Barbara Helm; Maaike A Versteegh
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.320

6.  Active migration is associated with specific and consistent changes to gut microbiota in Calidris shorebirds.

Authors:  Alice Risely; David W Waite; Beata Ujvari; Bethany J Hoye; Marcel Klaassen
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Differential expression analysis for sequence count data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix.

Authors:  Morgan N Price; Paramvir S Dehal; Adam P Arkin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Immune function in a free-living bird varies over the annual cycle, but seasonal patterns differ between years.

Authors:  Arne Hegemann; Kevin D Matson; Christiaan Both; B Irene Tieleman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 10.  Holes in the Hologenome: Why Host-Microbe Symbioses Are Not Holobionts.

Authors:  Angela E Douglas; John H Werren
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 7.867

View more
  6 in total

1.  Immune function differs among tropical environments but is not downregulated during reproduction in three year-round breeding equatorial lark populations.

Authors:  Henry K Ndithia; Kevin D Matson; Muchane Muchai; B Irene Tieleman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Immunogenetic variation shapes the gut microbiome in a natural vertebrate population.

Authors:  Charli S Davies; Sarah F Worsley; Kathryn H Maher; Jan Komdeur; Terry Burke; Hannah L Dugdale; David S Richardson
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 14.650

3.  The microbial environment modulates non-genetic maternal effects on egg immunity.

Authors:  H Pieter J van Veelen; Joana Falcão Salles; Kevin D Matson; G Sander van Doorn; Marco van der Velde; B Irene Tieleman
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2022-07-28

4.  Intestinal Microbes of Hooded Cranes (Grus monacha) Wintering in Three Lakes of the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Floodplain.

Authors:  Jingjing Gu; Lizhi Zhou
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Increased Microbial Diversity and Decreased Prevalence of Common Pathogens in the Gut Microbiomes of Wild Turkeys Compared to Domestic Turkeys.

Authors:  Julia Craft; Hyrum Eddington; Nicholas D Christman; Weston Pryor; John M Chaston; David L Erickson; Eric Wilson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Functional feeds marginally alter immune expression and microbiota of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) gut, gill, and skin mucosa though evidence of tissue-specific signatures and host-microbe coadaptation remain.

Authors:  Jacob W Bledsoe; Michael R Pietrak; Gary S Burr; Brian C Peterson; Brian C Small
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2022-03-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.