Literature DB >> 28815556

Trends in indications, complications and outcomes for venous resection during pancreatoduodenectomy.

D Kleive1,2, M A Sahakyan3,2, A E Berstad4, C S Verbeke5,2, I P Gladhaug1,2, B Edwin1,3,2, B Fosby6, P-D Line6,2, K J Labori1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatoduodenectomy with superior mesenteric-portal vein resection has become a common procedure in pancreatic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy plus venous resection at a high-volume centre, and to examine trends in management and outcome over a decade for the latter procedure.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study included all patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy with or without venous resection at Oslo University Hospital between January 2006 and December 2015. Trends were evaluated by assessing preoperative clinical and radiological characteristics, as well as perioperative outcomes in three time intervals (early, intermediate and late).
RESULTS: A total of 784 patients had a pancreatoduodenectomy, of whom 127 (16·2 per cent) underwent venous resection. Venous resection resulted in a longer operating time (median 422 versus 312 min; P = 0·001) and greater estimated blood loss (EBL) (median 700 versus 500 ml; P = 0·004) than standard pancreatoduodenectomy. The rate of severe complications was significantly higher for pancreatoduodenectomy with venous resection (37·0 versus 26·3 per cent; P = 0·014). The overall burden of complications, evaluated using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), did not differ (median score 8·7 versus 8·7; P = 0·175). Trends in venous resection over time showed a significant reduction in EBL (median 1050 versus 375 ml; P = 0·001) and duration of hospital stay (median 14 versus 9 days; P = 0·011) between the early and late periods. However, despite an improvement in the intermediate period, severe complication rates returned to baseline in the late period (18 of 43 versus 9 of 42 versus 20 of 42 patients in early, intermediate and late periods respectively; P = 0·032), as did CCI scores (median 20·9 versus 0 versus 20·9; P = 0·041).
CONCLUSION: Despite an initial improvement in severe complications for venous resection during pancreatoduodenectomy, this was not maintained over time. Every fourth patient with venous resection needed relaparotomy, most frequently for bleeding.
© 2017 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28815556     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  7 in total

1.  Predictive value of sarcopenia and visceral obesity for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy analyzed on clinically acquired CT and MRI.

Authors:  Minji Jang; Hyung Woo Park; Jimi Huh; Jong Hwa Lee; Yoong Ki Jeong; Yang Won Nah; Jisuk Park; Kyung Won Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Incidence and management of arterial injuries during pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Dyre Kleive; Mushegh A Sahakyan; Ammar Khan; Bjarte Fosby; Pål-Dag Line; Knut Jørgen Labori
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Parachute technique for portal vein reconstruction during pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein resection in patients with pancreatic head cancer.

Authors:  Shoichi Irie; Ryuji Yoshioka; Hiroshi Imamura; Yoshihiro Ono; Takafumi Sato; Yosuke Inoue; Hiromichi Ito; Yoshihiro Mise; Yu Takahashi; Akio Saiura
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Portal vein stent placement after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Ammar Khan; Dyre Kleive; Einar Martin Aandahl; Bjarte Fosby; Pål-Dag Line; Eric Dorenberg; Steinar Guvåg; Knut Jørgen Labori
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Prognostic Factors After Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer Initially Metastatic to the Liver.

Authors:  Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Isabella Frigerio; Giuseppe Malleo; Matteo de Pastena; Giacomo Deiro; Niccolò Surci; Filippo Scopelliti; Alessandro Esposito; Paolo Regi; Alessandro Giardino; Valentina Allegrini; Claudio Bassi; Roberto Girelli
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.339

Review 6.  Gastro- or Duodenojejunostomy Leaks After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Single Center Experience and Narrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Knut Jørgen Labori; Tore Tholfsen; Sheraz Yaqub; Kristoffer Lassen; Dyre Kleive; Anne Waage
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  What Should Guide the Performance of Venous Resection During Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Venous Contact?

Authors:  Julie Navez; Christelle Bouchart; Diane Lorenzo; Maria Antonietta Bali; Jean Closset; Jean-Luc van Laethem
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.344

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.