Jennifer Velloza1,2, Renee Heffron3,4,5. 1. Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. rheffron@uw.edu. 4. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. rheffron@uw.edu. 5. International Clinical Research Center, University of Washington, Box 359927, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA. rheffron@uw.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes existing evidence addressing the potential modulation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) products, specifically 1% tenofovir (TFV) gel and oral tenofovir-based PrEP, by vaginal dysbiosis and discusses future considerations for delivering novel, long-acting PrEP products to women at high risk for vaginal dysbiosis and HIV. RECENT FINDINGS: We describe results from analyses investigating the modification of PrEP efficacy by vaginal dysbiosis and studies of biological mechanisms that could render PrEP ineffective in the presence of specific microbiota. A secondary analysis from the CAPRISA-004 cohort demonstrated that there is no effect of the 1% TFV gel in the presence of non-Lactobacillus dominant microbiota. Another recent analysis comparing oral tenofovir-based PrEP efficacy among women with and without bacterial vaginosis in the Partners PrEP Study found that oral PrEP efficacy is not modified by bacterial vaginosis. Gardnerella vaginalis, commonly present in women with vaginal dysbiosis, can rapidly metabolize TFV particularly when it is locally applied and thereby prevent TFV integration into cells. Given that vaginal dysbiosis appears to modulate efficacy for 1% TFV gel but not for oral tenofovir-based PrEP, vaginal dysbiosis is potentially less consequential to HIV protection from TFV in the context of systemic drug delivery and high product adherence. Vaginal dysbiosis may undermine the efficacy of 1% TFV gel to protect women from HIV but not the efficacy of oral PrEP. Ongoing development of novel ring, injectable, and film-based PrEP products should investigate whether vaginal dysbiosis can reduce efficacy of these products, even in the presence of high adherence.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes existing evidence addressing the potential modulation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) products, specifically 1% tenofovir (TFV) gel and oral tenofovir-based PrEP, by vaginal dysbiosis and discusses future considerations for delivering novel, long-acting PrEP products to women at high risk for vaginal dysbiosis and HIV. RECENT FINDINGS: We describe results from analyses investigating the modification of PrEP efficacy by vaginal dysbiosis and studies of biological mechanisms that could render PrEP ineffective in the presence of specific microbiota. A secondary analysis from the CAPRISA-004 cohort demonstrated that there is no effect of the 1% TFV gel in the presence of non-Lactobacillus dominant microbiota. Another recent analysis comparing oral tenofovir-based PrEP efficacy among women with and without bacterial vaginosis in the Partners PrEP Study found that oral PrEP efficacy is not modified by bacterial vaginosis. Gardnerella vaginalis, commonly present in women with vaginal dysbiosis, can rapidly metabolize TFV particularly when it is locally applied and thereby prevent TFV integration into cells. Given that vaginal dysbiosis appears to modulate efficacy for 1% TFV gel but not for oral tenofovir-based PrEP, vaginal dysbiosis is potentially less consequential to HIV protection from TFV in the context of systemic drug delivery and high product adherence. Vaginal dysbiosis may undermine the efficacy of 1% TFV gel to protect women from HIV but not the efficacy of oral PrEP. Ongoing development of novel ring, injectable, and film-based PrEP products should investigate whether vaginal dysbiosis can reduce efficacy of these products, even in the presence of high adherence.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bacterial vaginosis; Efficacy; HIV prevention; Pre-exposure prophylaxis; Vaginal dysbiosis; Women
Authors: Christina Gosmann; Melis N Anahtar; Scott A Handley; Mara Farcasanu; Galeb Abu-Ali; Brittany A Bowman; Nikita Padavattan; Chandni Desai; Lindsay Droit; Amber Moodley; Mary Dong; Yuezhou Chen; Nasreen Ismail; Thumbi Ndung'u; Musie S Ghebremichael; Duane R Wesemann; Caroline Mitchell; Krista L Dong; Curtis Huttenhower; Bruce D Walker; Herbert W Virgin; Douglas S Kwon Journal: Immunity Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Mackenzie L Cottrell; Kuo H Yang; Heather M A Prince; Craig Sykes; Nicole White; Stephanie Malone; Evan S Dellon; Ryan D Madanick; Nicholas J Shaheen; Michael G Hudgens; Jacob Wulff; Kristine B Patterson; Julie A E Nelson; Angela D M Kashuba Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Linnet Masese; Jared M Baeten; Barbra A Richardson; Elizabeth Bukusi; Grace John-Stewart; Susan M Graham; Juma Shafi; James Kiarie; Julie Overbaugh; R Scott McClelland Journal: AIDS Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Erica Schlesinger; Daniel Johengen; Ellen Luecke; Ginger Rothrock; Ian McGowan; Ariane van der Straten; Tejal Desai Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2016-03-14 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Jacques Ravel; Pawel Gajer; Li Fu; Christine K Mauck; Sara S K Koenig; Joyce Sakamoto; Alison A Motsinger-Reif; Gustavo F Doncel; Steven L Zeichner Journal: MBio Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Alexander S Zevin; Irene Y Xie; Kenzie Birse; Kelly Arnold; Laura Romas; Garrett Westmacott; Richard M Novak; Stuart McCorrister; Lyle R McKinnon; Craig R Cohen; Romel Mackelprang; Jairam Lingappa; Doug A Lauffenburger; Nichole R Klatt; Adam D Burgener Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Michele N Austin; Leslie A Meyn; Hilary A Avolia; Melinda A Petrina; Lisa A Cosentino; Calins Alphonse; Beatrice A Chen; Katherine Bunge; Lisa Noguchi; Richard Beigi; Kathleen Squires; Sharon L Hillier Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 7.759
Authors: Ivana Parker; George Khalil; Amy Martin; Michael Martin; Suphak Vanichseni; Wanna Leelawiwat; Janet McNicholl; Andrew Hickey; J Gerardo García-Lerma; Kachit Choopanya; Kelly A Curtis Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 2.205