| Literature DB >> 28810617 |
Ying Zhang1, Jiarong Wu1, Quanhui Ni1, Hong Dong2.
Abstract
Chinese medicine residues contain abundant cellulose and hemicellulose, which are potential renewable carbon sources for ethanol production. The aim of the present study was to develop a rapid and reliable method to evaluate the cellulose and hemicellulose utilization in Chinese medicine residues. In the present study, key hydrolysates (arabinose, galactose, glucose, xylose, and cellobiose) of the cellulose and hemicellulose in fermentation liquor of Astragalus residues were simultaneously quantified by ion chromatography using an integrated pulsed amperometric detector (IPAD). HPLC analysis was performed on a Dionex ICS-2500 equipped with GP50 gradient pump and ED50 IPAD. The working and reference electrodes were gold electrode and Ag/AgCl electrode, respectively. Separation was achieved on serial no. 002627 Dionex Analytical column (2×250 mm). Sodium hydroxide of 250 mM and water were used as the mobile phase with a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. The temperature of column was kept at 30°C. This method was validated for accuracy and precision. The regression equation revealed a good linear relationship (R2=0.9959-0.9984) within the test ranges. The limits of detection and quantification for five standard analytes (arabinose, galactose, glucose, xylose and cellobiose) were in the range of 0.067-0.091 and 0.08-0.23 mg/l, respectively. The method showed good reproducibility for the quantification of five analytes in fermentation liquor of Astragalus residue with intra-and inter-day variations less than 3.843%.Entities:
Keywords: Astragalus residue; ion chromatography-integrated pulsed amperometric detection; multicomponent quantification
Year: 2017 PMID: 28810617 PMCID: PMC5525577 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4673
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1.Schematic diagram of two-step simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF).
HPLC gradient elution program.
| Time (min) | 250 mM NaOH (%) |
|---|---|
| 0–15 | 4 |
| 15–20 | 4–30 |
| 20–35 | 30 |
Figure 2.IEC-PAD chromatogram of arabinose, galactose, glucose, xylose, and cellobiose. (A) Standard solution and (B) sample. Calibration curves were plotted with LC Chameleon software. The regression equations, R2, RSD, retention time, limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) of the five compounds are listed in Table II. All calibration curves showed good linear regressions in the range (R2=0.9959–0.9984). The LODs (S/N=3) and LOQs (S/N=10) for sugars were within the ranges of 0.067–0.091 and 0.19–0.25 mg/l, respectively).
Regression equation and LOD and LOQ for arabinose, galactose, glucose, xylose, and cellobiose.
| Compounds | Retention time (min) | Regression equation | Linearity range (mg/l) | R2 | LOD (mg/l), S/N=3 | LOD (mg/l), S/N=10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arabinose | 7.269 | Y=10.998X-0.0866 | 0.10–1.50 | 0.9959 | 0.067 | 0.10 |
| Galactose | 9.085 | Y=10.701X-0.0297 | 0.10–1.50 | 0.9984 | 0.082 | 0.10 |
| Glucose | 9.852 | Y=12.929X-0.2877 | 0.30–4.50 | 0.9979 | 0.074 | 0.23 |
| Xylose | 11.009 | Y=10.669X-0.0978 | 0.10–1.50 | 0.9977 | 0.091 | 0.10 |
| Cellobiose | 29.469 | Y=7.3485X-0.0588 | 0.08–1.20 | 0.9971 | 0.080 | 0.08 |
LOD, limits of detection; LOQ, limits of quanitification; S/N, signal-to-noise ratio.
Precision data of retention time and peak areas.
| Intra-day precision (n=3, mean), %RSD | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Intra-day precision (n=9, mean), %RSD | ||||||||||
| Compounds | tR[ | PA[ | HC[ | tR | PA | HC | tR | PA | HC | tR | PA | HC | Recovery (%) |
| Arabinose | 0.780 | 0.967 | 2.386 | 1.697 | 2.135 | 3.242 | 0.865 | 0.122 | 1.975 | 1.895 | 1.427 | 3.090 | 97.83 |
| Galactose | 0.886 | 0.555 | 1.492 | 1.505 | 2.961 | 2.712 | 0.809 | 0.633 | 2.258 | 2.043 | 2.351 | 2.713 | 99.06 |
| Glucose | 0.801 | 0.301 | 0.270 | 1.424 | 0.373 | 0.982 | 0.877 | 0.699 | 1.082 | 1.906 | 0.643 | 1.766 | 98.47 |
| Xylose | 0.785 | 1.105 | 1.229 | 1.718 | 0.691 | 0.671 | 0.840 | 1.609 | 0.483 | 1.359 | 1.265 | 1.401 | 99.49 |
| Cellobiose | 0.362 | 0.806 | 1.215 | 0.383 | 2.600 | 2.313 | 0.165 | 2.630 | 3.233 | 0.895 | 2.639 | 3.843 | 102.05 |
%RSD of retention time
%RSD of peak area
%RSD of hydrolysate concentration.
Results of HPAEC-IPAD.
| Compounds | Arabinose | Galactose | Glucose | Xylose | Cellobiose |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentrations (g/l) | 4.19 | 1.33 | 17.57 | 0.81 | 0.035 |