Literature DB >> 28808792

Using Natural Language Processing of Free-Text Radiology Reports to Identify Type 1 Modic Endplate Changes.

Hannu T Huhdanpaa1, W Katherine Tan2,3, Sean D Rundell4,5, Pradeep Suri4,5,6, Falgun H Chokshi7, Bryan A Comstock2,3, Patrick J Heagerty2,3, Kathryn T James5,8, Andrew L Avins9, Srdjan S Nedeljkovic10, David R Nerenz11, David F Kallmes12, Patrick H Luetmer12, Karen J Sherman13, Nancy L Organ2,3, Brent Griffith14, Curtis P Langlotz15, David Carrell13, Saeed Hassanpour16, Jeffrey G Jarvik17,18,19,20.   

Abstract

Electronic medical record (EMR) systems provide easy access to radiology reports and offer great potential to support quality improvement efforts and clinical research. Harnessing the full potential of the EMR requires scalable approaches such as natural language processing (NLP) to convert text into variables used for evaluation or analysis. Our goal was to determine the feasibility of using NLP to identify patients with Type 1 Modic endplate changes using clinical reports of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations of the spine. Identifying patients with Type 1 Modic change who may be eligible for clinical trials is important as these findings may be important targets for intervention. Four annotators identified all reports that contained Type 1 Modic change, using N = 458 randomly selected lumbar spine MR reports. We then implemented a rule-based NLP algorithm in Java using regular expressions. The prevalence of Type 1 Modic change in the annotated dataset was 10%. Results were recall (sensitivity) 35/50 = 0.70 (95% confidence interval (C.I.) 0.52-0.82), specificity 404/408 = 0.99 (0.97-1.0), precision (positive predictive value) 35/39 = 0.90 (0.75-0.97), negative predictive value 404/419 = 0.96 (0.94-0.98), and F1-score 0.79 (0.43-1.0). Our evaluation shows the efficacy of rule-based NLP approach for identifying patients with Type 1 Modic change if the emphasis is on identifying only relevant cases with low concern regarding false negatives. As expected, our results show that specificity is higher than recall. This is due to the inherent difficulty of eliciting all possible keywords given the enormous variability of lumbar spine reporting, which decreases recall, while availability of good negation algorithms improves specificity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar spine imaging; Modic classification; Natural language processing; Radiology reporting

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28808792      PMCID: PMC5788819          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-0013-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  17 in total

1.  Automated detection of critical results in radiology reports.

Authors:  Paras Lakhani; Woojin Kim; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 3.  Vertebral endplate signal changes (Modic change): a systematic literature review of prevalence and association with non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Tue Secher Jensen; Jaro Karppinen; Joan S Sorensen; Jaakko Niinimäki; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Structured radiology reporting: are we there yet?

Authors:  Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology.

Authors:  David F Fardon; Alan L Williams; Edward J Dohring; F Reed Murtagh; Stephen L Gabriel Rothman; Gordon K Sze
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 6.  Advances in natural language processing.

Authors:  Julia Hirschberg; Christopher D Manning
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging.

Authors:  M T Modic; P M Steinberg; J S Ross; T J Masaryk; J R Carter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Natural Language Processing in Radiology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ewoud Pons; Loes M M Braun; M G Myriam Hunink; Jan A Kors
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Discerning tumor status from unstructured MRI reports--completeness of information in existing reports and utility of automated natural language processing.

Authors:  Lionel T E Cheng; Jiaping Zheng; Guergana K Savova; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Lumbar Imaging With Reporting Of Epidemiology (LIRE)--Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Jarvik; Bryan A Comstock; Kathryn T James; Andrew L Avins; Brian W Bresnahan; Richard A Deyo; Patrick H Luetmer; Janna L Friedly; Eric N Meier; Daniel C Cherkin; Laura S Gold; Sean D Rundell; Safwan S Halabi; David F Kallmes; Katherine W Tan; Judith A Turner; Larry G Kessler; Danielle C Lavallee; Kari A Stephens; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.226

View more
  11 in total

1.  Multi-Ontology Refined Embeddings (MORE): A hybrid multi-ontology and corpus-based semantic representation model for biomedical concepts.

Authors:  Steven Jiang; Weiyi Wu; Naofumi Tomita; Craig Ganoe; Saeed Hassanpour
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Natural Language Processing Applications in the Clinical Neurosciences: A Machine Learning Augmented Systematic Review.

Authors:  Quinlan D Buchlak; Nazanin Esmaili; Christine Bennett; Farrokh Farrokhi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2022

3.  Can We Geographically Validate a Natural Language Processing Algorithm for Automated Detection of Incidental Durotomy Across Three Independent Cohorts From Two Continents?

Authors:  Aditya V Karhade; Jacobien H F Oosterhoff; Olivier Q Groot; Nicole Agaronnik; Jeffrey Ehresman; Michiel E R Bongers; Ruurd L Jaarsma; Santosh I Poonnoose; Daniel M Sciubba; Daniel G Tobert; Job N Doornberg; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Natural language processing for automated annotation of medication mentions in primary care visit conversations.

Authors:  Craig H Ganoe; Weiyi Wu; Paul J Barr; William Haslett; Michelle D Dannenberg; Kyra L Bonasia; James C Finora; Jesse A Schoonmaker; Wambui M Onsando; James Ryan; Glyn Elwyn; Martha L Bruce; Amar K Das; Saeed Hassanpour
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2021-08-19

5.  Advanced diagnostic imaging utilization during emergency department visits in the United States: A predictive modeling study for emergency department triage.

Authors:  Xingyu Zhang; Joyce Kim; Rachel E Patzer; Stephen R Pitts; Falgun H Chokshi; Justin D Schrager
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A systematic review of natural language processing applied to radiology reports.

Authors:  Arlene Casey; Emma Davidson; Michael Poon; Hang Dong; Daniel Duma; Andreas Grivas; Claire Grover; Víctor Suárez-Paniagua; Richard Tobin; William Whiteley; Honghan Wu; Beatrice Alex
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Prediction of acute appendicitis among patients with undifferentiated abdominal pain at emergency department.

Authors:  Dai Su; Qinmengge Li; Tao Zhang; Philip Veliz; Yingchun Chen; Kevin He; Prashant Mahajan; Xingyu Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 8.  Natural language processing in low back pain and spine diseases: A systematic review.

Authors:  Luca Bacco; Fabrizio Russo; Luca Ambrosio; Federico D'Antoni; Luca Vollero; Gianluca Vadalà; Felice Dell'Orletta; Mario Merone; Rocco Papalia; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-14

Review 9.  The Bionic Radiologist: avoiding blurry pictures and providing greater insights.

Authors:  Marc Dewey; Uta Wilkens
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2019-07-09

10.  Data Mining in Spine Surgery: Leveraging Electronic Health Records for Machine Learning and Clinical Research.

Authors:  Victor E Staartjes; Martin N Stienen
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.