Literature DB >> 26493088

Lumbar Imaging With Reporting Of Epidemiology (LIRE)--Protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial.

Jeffrey G Jarvik1, Bryan A Comstock2, Kathryn T James3, Andrew L Avins4, Brian W Bresnahan3, Richard A Deyo5, Patrick H Luetmer6, Janna L Friedly7, Eric N Meier2, Daniel C Cherkin8, Laura S Gold9, Sean D Rundell7, Safwan S Halabi10, David F Kallmes6, Katherine W Tan2, Judith A Turner11, Larry G Kessler12, Danielle C Lavallee13, Kari A Stephens14, Patrick J Heagerty2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic imaging is often the first step in evaluating patients with back pain and likely functions as a "gateway" to a subsequent cascade of interventions. However, lumbar spine imaging frequently reveals incidental findings among normal, pain-free individuals suggesting that treatment of these "abnormalities" may not be warranted. Our prior work suggested that inserting the prevalence of imaging findings in patients without back pain into spine imaging reports may reduce subsequent interventions. We are now conducting a pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial to test the hypothesis that inserting this prevalence data into lumbar spine imaging reports for studies ordered by primary care providers will reduce subsequent spine-related interventions. METHODS/
DESIGN: We are using a stepped wedge design that sequentially randomizes 100 primary care clinics at four health systems to receive either standard lumbar spine imaging reports, or reports containing prevalence data for common imaging findings in patients without back pain. We capture all outcomes passively through the electronic medical record. Our primary outcome is spine-related intervention intensity based on Relative Value Units (RVUs) during the following year. Secondary outcomes include subsequent prescriptions for opioid analgesics and cross-sectional lumbar spine re-imaging. DISCUSSION: If our study shows that adding prevalence data to spine imaging reports decreases subsequent back-related RVUs, this intervention could be easily generalized and applied to other kinds of testing, as well as other conditions where incidental findings may be common. Our study also serves as a model for cluster randomized trials that are minimal risk and highly pragmatic.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Back pain; Cluster randomized trial; Lumbar imaging; Pragmatic randomized trial; Spine imaging; Stepped wedge design

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26493088      PMCID: PMC4674321          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  25 in total

1.  A comparison of classification algorithms to automatically identify chest X-ray reports that support pneumonia.

Authors:  W W Chapman; M Fizman; B E Chapman; P J Haug
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Three-year incidence of low back pain in an initially asymptomatic cohort: clinical and imaging risk factors.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Jarvik; William Hollingworth; Patrick J Heagerty; David R Haynor; Edward J Boyko; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Bing Li; Chantal M Couris; Kiyohide Fushimi; Patrick Graham; Phil Hider; Jean-Marie Januel; Vijaya Sundararajan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  MDPHnet: secure, distributed sharing of electronic health record data for public health surveillance, evaluation, and planning.

Authors:  Joshua Vogel; Jeffrey S Brown; Thomas Land; Richard Platt; Michael Klompas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The Longitudinal Assessment of Imaging and Disability of the Back (LAIDBack) Study: baseline data.

Authors:  J J Jarvik; W Hollingworth; P Heagerty; D R Haynor; R A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Hospital and surgeon variation in complications and repeat surgery following incident lumbar fusion for common degenerative diagnoses.

Authors:  Brook I Martin; Sohail K Mirza; Gary M Franklin; Jon D Lurie; Todd A MacKenzie; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Early imaging for acute low back pain: one-year health and disability outcomes among Washington State workers.

Authors:  Janessa M Graves; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Gary M Franklin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Lumbar MR imaging and reporting epidemiology: do epidemiologic data in reports affect clinical management?

Authors:  Brendan J McCullough; Germaine R Johnson; Brook I Martin; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Diagnostic evaluation of low back pain with emphasis on imaging.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Jarvik; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Prevalence of incidental findings in computed tomographic screening of the chest: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter C A Jacobs; Willem P Th M Mali; Diederick E Grobbee; Yolanda van der Graaf
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  21 in total

1.  Using Natural Language Processing of Free-Text Radiology Reports to Identify Type 1 Modic Endplate Changes.

Authors:  Hannu T Huhdanpaa; W Katherine Tan; Sean D Rundell; Pradeep Suri; Falgun H Chokshi; Bryan A Comstock; Patrick J Heagerty; Kathryn T James; Andrew L Avins; Srdjan S Nedeljkovic; David R Nerenz; David F Kallmes; Patrick H Luetmer; Karen J Sherman; Nancy L Organ; Brent Griffith; Curtis P Langlotz; David Carrell; Saeed Hassanpour; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Physicians' perspectives regarding pragmatic clinical trials.

Authors:  Rachel Topazian; Juli Bollinger; Kevin P Weinfurt; Rachel Dvoskin; Debra Mathews; Kathleen Brelsford; Matthew DeCamp; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 1.744

3.  Comparison of Natural Language Processing Rules-based and Machine-learning Systems to Identify Lumbar Spine Imaging Findings Related to Low Back Pain.

Authors:  W Katherine Tan; Saeed Hassanpour; Patrick J Heagerty; Sean D Rundell; Pradeep Suri; Hannu T Huhdanpaa; Kathryn James; David S Carrell; Curtis P Langlotz; Nancy L Organ; Eric N Meier; Karen J Sherman; David F Kallmes; Patrick H Luetmer; Brent Griffith; David R Nerenz; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Ethical responsibilities toward indirect and collateral participants in pragmatic clinical trials.

Authors:  Jaye Bea Smalley; Maria W Merritt; Sana M Al-Khatib; Debbe McCall; Karen L Staman; Carl Stepnowsky
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Statistical lessons learned for designing cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trials from the NIH Health Care Systems Collaboratory Biostatistics and Design Core.

Authors:  Andrea J Cook; Elizabeth Delong; David M Murray; William M Vollmer; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  A Comparison of Natural Language Processing Methods for the Classification of Lumbar Spine Imaging Findings Related to Lower Back Pain.

Authors:  Chethan Jujjavarapu; Vikas Pejaver; Trevor A Cohen; Sean D Mooney; Patrick J Heagerty; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 7.  Pragmatic clinical trials offer unique opportunities for disseminating, implementing, and sustaining evidence-based practices into clinical care: Proceedings of a workshop.

Authors:  Leah Tuzzio; Eric B Larson; David A Chambers; Gloria D Coronado; Lesley H Curtis; Wendy J Weber; Douglas F Zatzick; Catherine M Meyers
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2018-12-26

8.  Providing Epidemiological Data in Lumbar Spine Imaging Reports Did Not Affect Subsequent Utilization of Spine Procedures: Secondary Outcomes from a Stepped-Wedge Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Pradeep Suri; Eric N Meier; Laura S Gold; Zachary A Marcum; Sandra K Johnston; Kathryn T James; Brian W Bresnahan; Michael O'Reilly; Judith A Turner; David F Kallmes; Karen J Sherman; Richard A Deyo; Patrick H Luetmer; Andrew L Avins; Brent Griffith; Patrick J Heagerty; Sean D Rundell; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Janna L Friedly
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  Predictors of Lumbar Spine Degeneration and Low Back Pain in the Community: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project.

Authors:  Adam P Goode; Rebecca J Cleveland; Steven Z George; Todd A Schwartz; Virginia B Kraus; Jordan B Renner; Richard H Gracely; Louis E DeFrate; David Hu; Joanne M Jordan; Yvonne M Golightly
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.178

Review 10.  What behaviour change techniques have been used to improve adherence to evidence-based low back pain imaging?

Authors:  Amanda Hall; Helen Richmond; Andrea Pike; Rebecca Lawrence; Holly Etchegary; Michelle Swab; Jacqueline Y Thompson; Charlotte Albury; Jill Hayden; Andrea M Patey; James Matthews
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.