| Literature DB >> 26493088 |
Jeffrey G Jarvik1, Bryan A Comstock2, Kathryn T James3, Andrew L Avins4, Brian W Bresnahan3, Richard A Deyo5, Patrick H Luetmer6, Janna L Friedly7, Eric N Meier2, Daniel C Cherkin8, Laura S Gold9, Sean D Rundell7, Safwan S Halabi10, David F Kallmes6, Katherine W Tan2, Judith A Turner11, Larry G Kessler12, Danielle C Lavallee13, Kari A Stephens14, Patrick J Heagerty2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic imaging is often the first step in evaluating patients with back pain and likely functions as a "gateway" to a subsequent cascade of interventions. However, lumbar spine imaging frequently reveals incidental findings among normal, pain-free individuals suggesting that treatment of these "abnormalities" may not be warranted. Our prior work suggested that inserting the prevalence of imaging findings in patients without back pain into spine imaging reports may reduce subsequent interventions. We are now conducting a pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial to test the hypothesis that inserting this prevalence data into lumbar spine imaging reports for studies ordered by primary care providers will reduce subsequent spine-related interventions. METHODS/Entities:
Keywords: Back pain; Cluster randomized trial; Lumbar imaging; Pragmatic randomized trial; Spine imaging; Stepped wedge design
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26493088 PMCID: PMC4674321 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.10.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contemp Clin Trials ISSN: 1551-7144 Impact factor: 2.226