| Literature DB >> 28806905 |
Antonio Stanziano1, Anna Maria Caringella1, Clementina Cantatore1, Giuseppe Trojano2, Ettore Caroppo3, Giuseppe D'Amato1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound elastography is a non-invasive medical imaging technique able to quantitatively characterize the stiffness of a given tissue. It has been shown to predict the risk for cervical insufficiency and preterm delivery, and to allow differentiation of malignancy from normal tissue. The present study sought to evaluate whether cervical tissue dishomogeneity, as assessed by cervical ultrasound elastography, may predict the embryo transfer (ET) ease in infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI.Entities:
Keywords: Assisted reproduction; Cervical canal; Elastography; Embryo transfer; Female infertility
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28806905 PMCID: PMC5557509 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-017-0283-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Fig. 1Cervical elastography. a Identification of six regions of interest (ROI) in the cervix. The cervical canal is highlighted in yellow, and the internal and external uterine orifice are indicated with the symbol * and # respectively; b Cervical elastography in a normal case. The difference in tissue stiffness is expressed with a color scale. The green spring on the lower right end side is a real-time feedback of the correct performance of the strain image acquisition
Fig. 2Comparison of elastographic evaluation in a case with easy, difficult and impossible embryo transfer. a Cervical channel appears red, while the surrounding tissue comprehensive of the six regions of interest (ROI) appears uniformly green with rare blue spots. Embryo Transfer (ET) resulted to be easy; b Cervical canal is not uniformly defined, and surrounding tissue shows a dishomogeneous color pattern. ET resulted to be difficult; c Cervical canal appears to be partially obstructed by a hyperechoic tissue in grey scale image, while elastographic image demonstrates the presence of diffuse tissue dishomogeneity. ET was not feasible, and we had to proceed with a transmiometrial ET
Comparison of clinical parameters in patients stratified according to the ease of the embryo transfer (ET)
| Parameter | Group 1 (easy ET) | Group 2 (difficult ET) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age years | 36.3 (0.93) [26–47] | 36.7 (1.11) [29–44] | 0.668 |
| Basal FSH mIU/ml | 7.2 (0.55) [2.2–19] | 6.94 (0.71) [1.69–17] | 0.683 |
| Basal LH mIU/ml | 5.47 (0.45) [0.8–17.3] | 5.31 (0.69) [1.08–14] | 0.434 |
| Basal Estradiol pg/ml | 57.1 (8.7) [9.7–329] | 51.5 (7.7) [5.7–181] | 0.713 |
| AMH pmol/L | 3.1 (8.79 [0.1–13] | 2.9 (0.75) [0.01–11] | 0.280 |
| A/B Dishomogeneity index (DI) | 0.25 (0.03) [0–1.3] | 0.52 (0.06) [0.1–1.23] | 0.007 |
| C/D DI | 0.17 (0.02) [0–0.52] | 0.5 (0.06) [0.02–1.33] | 0.001 |
| E/F DI | 0.22 (0.03) [0.02–0.9] | 0.5 (0.1) [0–2.4] | 0.004 |
| Pregnancy rate | 31/99 (31%) | 20/54 (37%) | 0.47a |
Data are displayed as mean with 95% CI in parentheses and range in square brackets, unless otherwise specified. Comparison among groups were computed using two-tailed Mann Whitney U test or a two-tailed Z score for two population proportions
Binary logistic regression analysis of the predictive ability of three distinct dishomogeneity index (DI) values as provided by cervical elastography in discriminating the cases with easy or difficult embryo transfer
| Parameter | A/B DI | C/D DI | E/F DI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chi quare ( | 49.672 ( | 99.865 ( | 44.219 ( |
| Diagnostic accuracy % | 79.7 | 86.9 | 78.4 |
| Sensitivity % | 57.41 | 81.48% | 51.8 |
| Specificity % | 91.92 | 89.9% | 92.93 |
| Positive LR | 7.1 | 8.07 | 7.33 |
| Negative LR | 0.46 | 0.21 | 0.52 |
| PPV % | 79.4 | 81.48 | 80 |
| NPV % | 79.8 | 89.9 | 77.9 |