| Literature DB >> 28806408 |
Meagan L Dewar1,2, John P Y Arnould2, Theo R Allnutt3, Tamsyn Crowley3, Lutz Krause4,5, John Reynolds6,7, Peter Dann8, Stuart C Smith1.
Abstract
The establishment and early colonisation of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract has been recognised as a crucial stage in chick development, with pioneering microbial species responsible for influencing the development of the GI tract and influencing host health, fitness and disease status throughout life. Development of the microbiota in long lived seabirds is poorly understood. This study characterised the microbial composition of little penguin and short-tailed shearwater chicks throughout development, using Quantitative Real Time PCR (qPCR) and 16S rRNA sequencing. The results indicated that microbial development differed between the two seabird species with the short-tailed shearwater microbiota being relatively stable throughout development whilst significant fluctuations in the microbial composition and an upward trend in the abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were observed in the little penguin. When the microbial composition of adults and chicks was compared, both species showed low similarity in microbial composition, indicating that the adult microbiota may have a negligible influence over the chick's microbiota.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28806408 PMCID: PMC5555571 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1a. Mean abundance of the major phyla; Actinobacteria (a), Bacteroidetes (b), Firmicutes (c) and Proteobacteria (d) during development in little penguin chicks b. Mean abundance of the major phyla; Actinobacteria (a), Bacteroidetes (b), Firmicutes (c) and Proteobacteria (d) during development in short-tailed shearwater chicks.
Fig 2Heat map of 20 most abundant OTUs in STS and LP chicks and adults.
Assigned taxonomy (UPARSE, 90% confidence) is shown for each OTU.
Fig 3PCoA of weighted UniFrac distances among STS and LP samples.
Points are labelled with the chick age (weeks). LP = little penguin, STS = short tailed shearwater. PCO 1 and 2 shown, described 49% and 23% of total variation respectively.
Alpha diversity measures based on a rarefaction depth of 2104.
| Measure | LP mean | LP Std Dev | STS mean | STS Std Dev | t stat | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.05 | 4.998 | 32.83 | 4.978 | -2.467 | 0.025 | |
| 2.241 | 1.017 | 3.086 | 0.389 | -1.737 | 0.103 | |
| 0.597 | 0.211 | 0.793 | 0.058 | -1.995 | 0.077 |
Statistical comparison was the non-parametric t-test implemented by QIIME v 1.8 with 1000 bootstrap replicates. LP = little penguin, STS = short tailed shearwater
Alpha diversity correlated with development age of chicks.
| Age (weeks) | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measure | STS | LP | STS R | STS p-value | LP R | LP p-value | ||||||||
| 2 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 | |||||
| Obs. OTUs | 33 | 39 | 38 | 39 | 36 | 29 | 35 | 39 | 39 | 34 | 0.372 | 0.269 | 0.534 | 0.177 |
| Shannon | 4.97 | 5.2 | 5.15 | 5.21 | 5.08 | 4.76 | 5.03 | 5.18 | 5.16 | 4.96 | 0.367 | 0.272 | 0.480 | 0.207 |
| Simpson | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.363 | 0.274 | 0.418 | 0.242 |
Fig 4Bar charts showing the taxonomic diversity of LP and STS samples (proportion of total reads assigned to each taxon).
Chick age is shown in weeks.