| Literature DB >> 28805686 |
Akello J Agwa1, Yen-Hua Huang2, David J Craik3, Sónia T Henriques4, Christina I Schroeder5.
Abstract
Spider gating modifier toxins (GMTs) are poteical">nt modulators of voltage-gated ion channels and have thus attracted atteical">ntion as drug leads for several pathophysiological conditions. GMTs contain three disulfide bonds organized in an inhibitory cystine knot, which putatively confers them with high stability; however, thus far, there has not been a focused study to establish the stability of GMTs in physiological conditions. We examined the resistance of five GMTs including GpTx-1, HnTx-IV, HwTx-IV, PaurTx-3 and SgTx-1, to pH, thermal and proteolytic degradation. The peptides were stable under physiological conditions, except SgTx-1, which was susceptible to proteolysis, probably due to a longer C-terminus compared to the other peptides. In non-physiological conditions, the five peptides withstood chaotropic degradation, and all but SgTx-1 remained intact after prolonged exposure to high temperature; however, the peptides were degraded in strongly alkaline solutions. GpTx-1 and PaurTx-3 were more resistant to basic hydrolysis than HnTx-IV, HwTx-IV and SgTx-1, probably because a shorter interconnecting loop 3 on GpTx-1 and PaurTx-3 may stabilize interactions between the C-terminus and the hydrophobic patch. Here, we establish that most GMTs are exceptionally stable, and propose that, in the design of GMT-based therapeutics, stability can be enhanced by optimizing the C-terminus in terms of length, and increased interactions with the hydrophobic patch.Entities:
Keywords: NaV1.7; nuclear magnetic resonance; pain; rational drug design; serum stability; spider venom
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28805686 PMCID: PMC5577582 DOI: 10.3390/toxins9080248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Figure 1Conserved structural features of spider-derived GMTs. (A) ribbon representations of GpTx-1 [17], HnTx-IV (PDB ID: 1NIY) [19], HwTx-IV (PDB ID: 2M4X) [21], PaurTx-3 (PDB ID: 5WE3, this study) and SgTx-1 (PDB ID: 1LA4) [18]. The backbones of the GMTs are shown in white and the disulfide bridges forming the inhibitory cystine knot are shown in brown. GpTx-1, HnTx-IV and PaurTx-3 each have two anti-parallel β-sheets, SgTx-1 has three, and HwTx-IV has no anti-parallel β-sheets. Locations of N- and C-termini and of Cys I–VI (highlighted in yellow) are identified on HwTx-IV for clarity; (B) surface representations of the GMTs showing the conserved hydrophobic patch and charged ring of spider toxins, where hydrophobic residues are green, positively charged residues are blue and negatively charged residues are red. The disulfide bridges are buried within the hydrophobic patch; (C) sequences of the peptides are shown (aligned to cysteine residues of HwTx-IV and HnTx-IV) with cysteines highlighted in yellow, residues making up interconnecting loops are identified with arrows, N- and C-termini are shown and * denotes amidated C-terminal.
Figure 2Solution NMR structure of PaurTx-3 (PDB ID: 5WE3, this study). The 20 best conformers selected from lowest energy and best MolProbity scores are shown [35]. (A) Backbone of the structures is red and disulfide bridges are yellow with N- and C-termini and cysteines I-VI labeled; (B) two antiparallel β-sheets are shown in red, the residues forming the hydrophobic patch are shown in green and the turns on the structures are shown in blue with proline residues in position 11 and 18.
Energies and structural statistics 1 for the final 20 2 structures of PaurTx-3.
| Overall | −1232.31 ± 50.68 |
| Bonds | 23.83 ± 2.03 |
| Angles | 64.83 ± 6.52 |
| Improper | 19.89 ± 2.47 |
| Dihedral | 164.27 ± 1.66 |
| Van der Waals | −131.51 ± 7.15 |
| Electrostatic | −1374.68 ± 52.43 |
| NOE | 0.38 ± 0.04 |
| Constrained dihedral (cDih) | 0.66 ± 0.40 |
| Clash score (>0.4 Å/1000 atoms) | 11.10 ± 3.94 |
| Poor rotamers (%) | 2.88 ± 2.30 |
| Ramachandran outliers (%) | 0.47 ± 1.14 |
| Ramachandran favoured (%) | 87.50 ± 3.36 |
| MolProbity score | 2.45 ± 0.26 |
| MolProbity percentile 3 | 50.40 ± 14.91 |
| Mean global backbone (2–31) 4 | 0.71 ± 0.21 |
| Mean global heavy (2–31) | 1.51 ± 0.21 |
| Mean global backbone (1–34) | 0.88 ± 0.23 |
| Mean global heavy (1–34) | 1.67 ± 0.20 |
| Intraresidue ( | 134 |
| Sequential ( | 120 |
| Medium range ( | 42 |
| Long range ( | 40 |
| Hydrogen bonds 5 | 14 |
| Total | 350 |
| φ | 18 |
| ψ | 18 |
| χ1 | 5 |
| Total | 41 |
| Total NOE violations exceeding 0.2 Å | 1 |
| Total dihedral violations exceeding 2.0° | 2 |
1 ±St Dev. 2 Based on structures with highest overall MolProbity score [35]. 3 100th percentile is the best among structures of comparable resolution; 0th percentile is the worst. 4 RMSD calculated in MOLMOL (Version 2k.2, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, ETH, Zürich, Switzerland) [36]. 5 Two restraints were used per hydrogen bond.
Figure 3Reversible thermal denaturation of GMTs. 1D 1H solution NMR was used to monitor the structural changes to the five peptides at temperatures ranging from 20 to 80 °C. GpTx-1, HwTx-IV and PaurTx-3 maintained narrow peaks up to 80 °C, although there was some loss in peak intensity in the amide region of the spectra. SgTx-1 and HnTx-IV showed both a loss in intensity and broadening of peaks at 80 °C. NOE correlations confirm that the appearance of two peaks in the 10 ppm region of the 1D 1H spectra of PaurTx-3 are a result of the separation of the ε1 proton on the imidazole rings of Trp 29 and Trp 7.
Figure 4Analytical RP-HPLC traces of the GMTs following heating to 100 °C. All of the peptides except SgTx-1 and ProTx-1 showed remarkable stability after the thermal assault.
Figure 5Irreversible thermal degradation of SgTx-1 and ProTx-1. Analytical RP-HPLC was used to examine the peptides after heating to 100 °C and subsequent cooling to room temperature. Degradation products were further characterized using MALDI-MS (A) SgTx-1 lost 18 Da from the parent peptide; (B) ProTx-1 underwent more extensive degradation, showing a 389.4 Da loss; (C) sequences of SgTx-1 and ProTx-1 are shown with cysteines highlighted in yellow and C-terminal residues shown in green.
Figure 6(A) pH dependent hydrolysis of the peptides was monitored at pH 2, 4, 7.4, 9 and 12 using analytical RP-HPLC following a 24 h incubation at 37 °C. Reduced PaurTx-3 was used as a control. Data points are relative to amount of peptide at pH 4 and error bars are ± SE for n = 3; (B) comparisons of the analytical RP-HPLC traces of the peptides at pH 4 and pH 12 are shown and (C) MALDI-MS spectra for HwTx-IV, PaurTx-3 and SgTx-1 at pH 12 are also shown.
Figure 7Proteolytic degradation of GMTs. The five GMTs were incubated in human serum and degradation was monitored using RP-HPLC at 0 h, 1 h, 8 h and 24 h. R-BP100 was used as a control. Data points are relative to amount of peptide at 0 h and error bars are ± SE for n = 3.
Figure 8GMT stability in 6 M GdHCl following 16 h incubation at 25 °C, as monitored using RP-HPLC.
GMT C-terminal RMSD 1 values.
| Peptide | Backbone RMSD (Å) (Pre C-Term) 2 | Backbone RMSD (Å) (C-Term) 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GpTx-1 | 0.18 ± 0.09 (Asp 1–Trp 29) | 0.17 ± 0.09 (Lys 31–Phe 34) |
| HnTx-IV | 0.60 ± 0.13 (Glu 1–Trp 30) | 0.51 ± 0.22 (Lys 32–Ile 35) |
| HwTx-IV | 0.34 ± 0.09 (Glu 1–Trp 30) | 0.39 ± 0.17 (Lys 32–Ile 35) |
| PaurTx-3 | 0.79 ± 0.22 (Asp 1–Trp 29) | 0.30 ± 0.14 (Lys 31–Ile 34) |
| SgTx-1 | 0.38 ± 0.11 (Thr 1–Tyr 27) | 1.58 ± 0.43 (Asp 29–Phe 34) |
1 Global RMSD calculated using MOLMOL [36]. 2 Residues prior to the final cysteine in the sequence ± standard deviation (SD) from the mean. 3 Residues after the final cysteine in the sequence ± SD from the mean.
Figure 9Structural features of the loops, turns and C-termini of GMTs. (A) ribbon representations of 20 structures of PaurTx-3 (PDB ID: 5W3E, this study), HwTx-IV (PDB ID: 2M4X) [21], and HnTx-IV (PDB ID: 1NIY) [19], and 10 structures of GpTx-1 [17], are shown where loop 2 is highlighted in red, loop 3 is in blue and the C-terminal is in green (labels on HwTx-IV for clarity). The side chain of Pro 18 is shown for GpTx-1 and PaurTx-3 in blue; (B) sequences of the peptides are also shown and the residues forming each loop and the C-terminal are identified by arrows. Sequences of hydrophobic amino acid residues and residues forming the hydrophobic patch are colored green and * denotes amidated C-terminal; (C) green sticks show the side chains of hydrophobic residues on HwTx-IV and PaurTx-3.