Literature DB >> 28804409

Learning you are "at risk": seniors' experiences of nutrition risk screening.

Holly Reimer1, Heather Keller2, Joseph Tindale1.   

Abstract

Nutrition risk screening can help identify community-dwelling older adults who may benefit from nutrition education and interventions to improve food intake. Research has shown, however, that older adults who are found "at risk" through nutrition screening commonly do not see themselves at risk, and many do not follow through with accessing recommended nutrition services. Thus, the purpose of this qualitative study was to examine older adults' experiences of learning they were at risk through nutrition screening and to identify what influenced their perspectives and responses to their screening results. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 22 older adults who had screened at risk (SCREEN II© scores < 54) through a nutrition screening process conducted by mail. Participants received their screening results in a personalized letter before the interview, along with some recommendations to help improve food intake and decrease their nutrition risk. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed for themes. When participants reflected about receiving their screening results, some described feeling surprised or even upset by the message that they were at increased risk, whereas others felt unconcerned or reacted with heightened attentiveness to their nutrition. They also began to rationalize their screening score and found ways to explain away their risk. The message that they were at increased risk was poorly understood and not well received because it contradicted their perspective: they felt they were doing the right things, they saw room for improvement rather than seeing themselves at risk, and they tended to make comparisons that helped support the view that they were not truly at risk. Further, even though participants saw room for improvement, they described barriers to change and commonly felt that the recommendations were more applicable for others than themselves. Strategies to improve communication of nutrition screening results and recommendations are discussed to help seniors better understand their risk and take steps to improve their nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aged; Nutrition; Risk; Screening

Year:  2011        PMID: 28804409      PMCID: PMC5547317          DOI: 10.1007/s10433-011-0208-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ageing        ISSN: 1613-9372


  17 in total

1.  The Development of Seniors in the Community: Risk Evaluation for Eating and Nutrition (SCREEN).

Authors:  HEATHER H. Keller; MARGARET R. Hedley; SHARON Wong Brownlee
Journal:  Can J Diet Pract Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 0.940

2.  Understanding nutritional health in older adults. A pilot study.

Authors:  Bonnie Callen
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.254

3.  Position paper of the American Dietetic Association: nutrition across the spectrum of aging.

Authors:  Marie Fanelli Kuczmarski; Diane O Weddle
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2005-04

4.  Validity and reliability of SCREEN II (Seniors in the community: risk evaluation for eating and nutrition, Version II).

Authors:  H H Keller; R Goy; S-L Kane
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 5.  Promoting food intake in older adults living in the community: a review.

Authors:  Heather H Keller
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.665

6.  Process evaluation of bringing nutrition screening to seniors in Canada (BNSS).

Authors:  Heather H Keller; Helen Haresign; Beverly Brockest
Journal:  Can J Diet Pract Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.940

7.  Canadian dietitians' understanding of the client-centered approach to nutrition counseling.

Authors:  Debbie MacLellan; Shawna Berenbaum
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2007-08

Review 8.  Unrealistic optimism about diet-related risks: implications for interventions.

Authors:  M M Raats; P Sparks
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.297

9.  Older women and dietary advice: occurrence, comprehension and compliance.

Authors:  K Gustafsson; J Ekblad; B Sidenvall
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.089

10.  "Sneaky disease": the body and health knowledge for people at risk for coronary heart disease in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  J Angus; S Evans; J Lapum; E Rukholm; R St Onge; R Nolan; I Michel
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  3 in total

1.  Community-Living Older Adults' Perceptions of Body Weight, Signs of Malnutrition and Sources of Information: a Descriptive Analysis of Survey Data.

Authors:  D L Craven; G P Lovell; F E Pelly; E Isenring
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 2.  Barriers and facilitators to screening and treating malnutrition in older adults living in the community: a mixed-methods synthesis.

Authors:  Philine S Harris; Liz Payne; Leanne Morrison; Sue M Green; Daniela Ghio; Claire Hallett; Emma L Parsons; Paul Aveyard; Helen C Roberts; Michelle Sutcliffe; Siân Robinson; Joanna Slodkowska-Barabasz; Paul S Little; Michael A Stroud; Lucy Yardley
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  Optimising an intervention to support home-living older adults at risk of malnutrition: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Liz Payne; Daniela Ghio; Elisabeth Grey; Joanna Slodkowska-Barabasz; Philine Harris; Michelle Sutcliffe; Sue Green; Helen C Roberts; Caroline Childs; Sian Robinson; Bernard Gudgin; Pam Holloway; Jo Kelly; Kathy Wallis; Oliver Dean; Paul Aveyard; Paramjit Gill; Mike Stroud; Paul Little; Lucy Yardley; Leanne Morrison
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.497

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.