Literature DB >> 32494883

Prevention of intra-thoracic recurrent laryngeal nerve injury with robot-assisted esophagectomy.

Kei Hosoda1, Masahiro Niihara2, Hideki Ushiku2, Hiroki Harada2, Mikiko Sakuraya2, Marie Washio2, Keishi Yamashita2,3, Naoki Hiki2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is one of the most invasive procedures in surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Serious complications sometimes occur after esophageal cancer surgery, including recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and pneumonia. The purpose of this study was to access the possibility of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in terms of preventing recurrent laryngeal nerve injury.
METHODS: Operations in thoracic part were performed in prone position with bilateral ventilation. During dissection of the recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes, thin blood vessels were coagulated with Maryland bipolar forceps in the left hand and then dissected with monopolar scissors in the right hand. Especially when dissecting left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes, the nerve was left unisolated from the vascular sheath that involves the aortic arch. Short-term outcomes including operative time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative complications including recurrent laryngeal nerve injury were accessed.
RESULTS: From November 2018 to January 2020, 20 patients underwent robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Thoracic operative time was 242 min, estimated blood loss in the thoracic part was minimal, the number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes was 19 (all median), and the incidence rates of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and pneumonia were 10% (2 case) and 10% (2 cases), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer has the possibility of reducing recurrent laryngeal nerve injury even in the introductory period. Randomized controlled trials are required to confirm this advantage of the robotic surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lymphadenectomy; Prone position; Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury; Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32494883     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01904-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  25 in total

1.  The robotic, 2-stage, 3-field esophagolymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Kemp H Kernstine; Daniel T DeArmond; Mohsen Karimi; Timothy L Van Natta; Javier H Campos; Javier C Campos; Mary R Yoder; Jeffrey E Everett
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer.

Authors:  P van Hagen; M C C M Hulshof; J J B van Lanschot; E W Steyerberg; M I van Berge Henegouwen; B P L Wijnhoven; D J Richel; G A P Nieuwenhuijzen; G A P Hospers; J J Bonenkamp; M A Cuesta; R J B Blaisse; O R C Busch; F J W ten Kate; G-J Creemers; C J A Punt; J T M Plukker; H M W Verheul; E J Spillenaar Bilgen; H van Dekken; M J C van der Sangen; T Rozema; K Biermann; J C Beukema; A H M Piet; C M van Rij; J G Reinders; H W Tilanus; A van der Gaast
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy.

Authors:  T Nomi; D Fuks; Y Kawaguchi; F Mal; Y Nakajima; B Gayet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophageal Resection: Three-year Follow-up of the Previously Reported Randomized Controlled Trial: the TIME Trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Straatman; Nicole van der Wielen; Miguel A Cuesta; Freek Daams; Josep Roig Garcia; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Donald L van der Peet
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The usefulness of three-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Kotaro Yamashita; Shinji Mine; Tasuku Toihata; Ian Fukudome; Akihiko Okamura; Masami Yuda; Masaru Hayami; Yu Imamura; Masayuki Watanabe
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.230

6.  Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial.

Authors:  Marc Ychou; Valérie Boige; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Thierry Conroy; Olivier Bouché; Gilles Lebreton; Muriel Ducourtieux; Laurent Bedenne; Jean-Michel Fabre; Bernard Saint-Aubert; Jean Genève; Philippe Lasser; Philippe Rougier
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Benchmarking Complications Associated with Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Donald E Low; Madhan Kumar Kuppusamy; Derek Alderson; Ivan Cecconello; Andrew C Chang; Gail Darling; Andrew Davies; Xavier Benoit D'Journo; Suzanne S Gisbertz; S Michael Griffin; Richard Hardwick; Arnulf Hoelscher; Wayne Hofstetter; Blair Jobe; Yuko Kitagawa; Simon Law; Christophe Mariette; Nick Maynard; Christopher R Morse; Philippe Nafteux; Manuel Pera; C S Pramesh; Sonia Puig; John V Reynolds; Wolfgang Schroeder; Mark Smithers; B P L Wijnhoven
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database.

Authors:  Hiroya Takeuchi; Hiroaki Miyata; Mitsukazu Gotoh; Yuko Kitagawa; Hideo Baba; Wataru Kimura; Naohiro Tomita; Tohru Nakagoe; Mitsuo Shimada; Kenichi Sugihara; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Jikke M T Omloo; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Jan B F Hulscher; Johannes B Reitsma; Paul Fockens; Herman van Dekken; Fiebo J W Ten Kate; Huug Obertop; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  3 in total

1.  Perioperative Outcomes and Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted McKeown Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hai-Bo Sun; Duo Jiang; Xian-Ben Liu; Wen-Qun Xing; Shi-Lei Liu; Pei-Nan Chen; Peng Li; Ya-Xing Ma
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Features and applications of energy devices for prone robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a narrative review.

Authors:  Noriyuki Hirahara; Takeshi Matsubara; Hikota Hayashi; Yoshitsugu Tajima
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.005

3.  Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Yiyang Liu; Hao Peng; Rongchun Wang; Kang Wang; Demin Li
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.