BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cyclin D-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) are crucial regulators of the G1 to S phase transition of the cell cycle and are actively pursued as therapeutic targets in cancer. We sought to discover a novel series of orally bioavailable and highly selective small molecule inhibitors of CDK4/6. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The discovery of pharmacological inhibitors and optimization for potency, selectivity and drug properties were achieved by iterative chemical synthesis, biochemical screening against a panel of kinases, cell-based assays measuring cellular viability, cell cycle distribution, induction of apoptosis and the level of retinoblastoma tumour suppressor protein (Rb) phosphorylation and E2 factor (E2F)-regulated gene expression and in vitro biopharmaceutical and in vivo pharmacokinetic profiling. KEY RESULTS: We discovered several lead compounds that displayed >1000-fold selectivity for CDK4/6 over other members of the CDK family. The lead compounds, 82, 91 and 95, potently inhibited the growth of cancer cells by inducing G1 arrest with a concomitant reduction in the phosphorylation of Rb at S780 and in E2F-regulated gene expression. With a remarkable selectivity for CDK4 over 369 human protein kinases, 91 was identified as a highly potent and orally bioavailable drug candidate. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We have identified unique and new inhibitors of CDK4/6 as potential drug candidates. Compound 91 represents an ideal candidate for further development as targeted cancer therapy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cyclin D-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) are crucial regulators of the G1 to S phase transition of the cell cycle and are actively pursued as therapeutic targets in cancer. We sought to discover a novel series of orally bioavailable and highly selective small molecule inhibitors of CDK4/6. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The discovery of pharmacological inhibitors and optimization for potency, selectivity and drug properties were achieved by iterative chemical synthesis, biochemical screening against a panel of kinases, cell-based assays measuring cellular viability, cell cycle distribution, induction of apoptosis and the level of retinoblastoma tumour suppressor protein (Rb) phosphorylation and E2 factor (E2F)-regulated gene expression and in vitro biopharmaceutical and in vivo pharmacokinetic profiling. KEY RESULTS: We discovered several lead compounds that displayed >1000-fold selectivity for CDK4/6 over other members of the CDK family. The lead compounds, 82, 91 and 95, potently inhibited the growth of cancer cells by inducing G1 arrest with a concomitant reduction in the phosphorylation of Rb at S780 and in E2F-regulated gene expression. With a remarkable selectivity for CDK4 over 369 human protein kinases, 91 was identified as a highly potent and orally bioavailable drug candidate. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We have identified unique and new inhibitors of CDK4/6 as potential drug candidates. Compound 91 represents an ideal candidate for further development as targeted cancer therapy.
Authors: Sarah Diab; Peng Li; Sunita K C Basnet; Jingfeng Lu; Mingfeng Yu; Hugo Albrecht; Robert W Milne; Shudong Wang Journal: Future Med Chem Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 3.808
Authors: Michael J Curtis; Richard A Bond; Domenico Spina; Amrita Ahluwalia; Stephen P A Alexander; Mark A Giembycz; Annette Gilchrist; Daniel Hoyer; Paul A Insel; Angelo A Izzo; Andrew J Lawrence; David J MacEwan; Lawrence D F Moon; Sue Wonnacott; Arthur H Weston; John C McGrath Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Stephen Ph Alexander; Doriano Fabbro; Eamonn Kelly; Neil Marrion; John A Peters; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Lars Anders; Nan Ke; Per Hydbring; Yoon J Choi; Hans R Widlund; Joel M Chick; Huili Zhai; Marc Vidal; Stephen P Gygi; Pascal Braun; Piotr Sicinski Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: John E Bisi; Jessica A Sorrentino; Patrick J Roberts; Francis X Tavares; Jay C Strum Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Stephen Ph Alexander; Doriano Fabbro; Eamonn Kelly; Neil Marrion; John A Peters; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Hao Shao; Shenhua Shi; Shiliang Huang; Alison J Hole; Abdullahi Y Abbas; Sonja Baumli; Xiangrui Liu; Frankie Lam; David W Foley; Peter M Fischer; Martin Noble; Jane A Endicott; Chris Pepper; Shudong Wang Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Abel Tesfaye Anshabo; Laychiluh Bantie; Sarah Diab; Jimma Lenjisa; Alemwork Kebede; Yi Long; Gary Heinemann; Jasmine Karanjia; Benjamin Noll; Sunita K C Basnet; Manjun Li; Robert Milne; Hugo Albrecht; Shudong Wang Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 6.639