| Literature DB >> 28796794 |
Pascale Vonaesch1,2, Laura Tondeur2, Sébastien Breurec3,4,5, Petula Bata6, Liem Binh Luong Nguyen4, Thierry Frank4, Alain Farra4, Clotaire Rafaï4, Tamara Giles-Vernick2, Jean Chrysostome Gody6, Ionela Gouandjika-Vasilache7, Philippe Sansonetti1, Muriel Vray2,8.
Abstract
Stunting remains a major public health concern worldwide. Although its global prevalence is slowly decreasing, the actual number of affected children is still rising in Sub-Saharan Africa. In the Central African Republic (CAR), about one third of all children below the age of five are stunted. Stunting is correlated with many long-term consequences, including poor cognitive development and a higher rate of morbidity and mortality, making stunting a major contributor to poverty. In CAR, little is known about the factors that contribute to stunting. This study aimed at analysing, in a cross-sectional study, the main factors associated with stunting in a group of 414 children recruited between December 2011 and November 2013, aged five years or less and living in Bangui. For all children, demographic, socio-economic and anthropometric data were recorded and asymptomatic enteropathogen carriage was assessed in stool samples using classical microbiological assays. The study group had a mean age of 14.2±10 months. Fifty-eight percent (292/414) were boys, and 36 percent (148/414) exhibited stunted growth. Of the stunted children, 51% (75/148) showed a moderate delay in linear growth for their age group [height-for-age z-score (HAZ) between -2 and -3 SD] while 49% (73/148) presented a severe delay (HAZ < -3). Factors significantly associated with stunting included gender (aOR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.07; 2.62 for boys compared to girls) and age (aOR of 3.98 (95% CI: 2.45; 6.46) for toddlers and aOR 4.42 (95% CI: 2.36; 8.28) for children compared to infants). Most importantly, we identified being overweight [weight-for-height z-score (WHZ) > 2 SD; aOR: 3.21; 95% CI: 1.50; 6.90 of overweight compared to normal weight] as also being significantly associated with stunting. This is the first study showing that even in the poorest countries of the world there is an association of stunting with being overweight.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28796794 PMCID: PMC5552116 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flow-chart of the subjects included in the study.
Description of socioeconomic characteristics (n = 414).
| Description of study population: socioeconomic status, sanitation | |
|---|---|
| Lowest income | 34/414 (8%) |
| Middle income | 331/414 (80%) |
| Highest income | 49/414 (12%) |
| 224/414 (54%) | |
| 318/414 (77%) | |
| At least sometimes water from well | 81/414 (19%) |
| Running water or from fountain only | 222/414 (54%) |
| Only mineral water | 91/414 (22%) |
| Other (breastfeeding only etc.) | 20/414 (5%) |
| At least sometimes water from well | 239/414 (58%) |
| Running water or from fountain only | 174/414 (42%) |
| Only mineral water | 0/414 (0%) |
| 128/414 (31%) | |
| Fingers only | 113/414 (27%) |
| Cutlery only | 195/414 (47%) |
| Both | 97/414 (24%) |
| No data | 9/414 (2%) |
*defined as in Breurec et al., Plos Neglected Tropical Diseases 2015
Description of general study population: Anthropometric measurements (n = 414).
| Description of study population: age, gender, anthropometric measurements | |
|---|---|
| 122 /414 (46%) | |
| 14.2 ±10.0 | |
| -1.45 ±1.7 | |
| Normal growth (HAZ ≥ -2 SD) | 266/414 (64%) |
| Stunted (HAZ < -2 SD) | 148/414 (36%) |
| 0.25 ± 1.31 | |
| Normal weight (-2 SD≤ WHZ≤ 2SD) | 363/414 (88%) |
| Acute malnutrition (WHZ < -2 SD) | 16/414 (4%) |
| 0.38 ±1.37 | |
| Normal weight (-2 SD≤ zBMI≤ 2SD) | 355/414 (86%) |
| Overweight and obese (zBMI >2 SD) | 42/414 (10%) |
1 Mean ± Standard Deviation
2 stunted: < -2 height-for-age z-score (HAZ) (moderately stunted: -3 ≤ HAZ < -2; severely stunted: HAZ < -3)
3 acute malnutrition based on weight-for-height z-score (WHZ) score: < -2 WHZ (moderately acutely malnourished (MAM): -3 ≤ WHZ < -2; severely acutely malnourished (SAM): WHZ < -3).
4 Overweight based on Body-Mass Index z-score (zBMI): overweight: zBMI> 2SD (Overweight: 3≤ zBMI > 2 SD and obese zBMI > 3 SD)
Description of general study population for asymptomatic pathogen carriage (n = 414).
| 177/414 (44%) | |
| 66/414 (16%) | |
| 37/414 (9%) | |
| 57/414 (14%) | |
| 39/414 (9%) | |
| 32/414 (8%) | |
| 7/414 (2%) | |
| 97/414 (23%) | |
| 33/414 (6%) | |
| 35/414 (8%) | |
| 4/414 (1%) | |
| 13/414 (3%) | |
| 49/414 (12%) | |
| 19/414 (5%) | |
| 61/414 (16%) | |
Fig 2Pathogen load in different age categories.
A: Pathogen load by age category for the three main groups of pathogens, parasites (white bars), bacteria (grey bars) and viruses (black bars). B: Infection with multiple pathogens by age category. White bars indicate the presence of at least one pathogen of any group (parasite, bacteria or virus), grey bars the presence of at least two pathogens of any group (parasite, bacteria or virus) and black bars indicate mixed infections with at least one representative of two different groups (virus, parasite or bacteria) in the same child. Infant: 0–11 months, Toddler: 12–23 months; Child: ≥ 24 months).
Risk factors associated with stunting (n = 414).
| Non stunted | Stunted | Unadjusted OR | p-value unadjusted | Adjusted OR | p-value adjusted OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 266 | N = 148 | (95%CI) | OR | (95%CI) | ||
| 122 (46%) | 52 (35%) | 0.64 (0.42; 0.97) | 0.034 | 0.61 (0.38; 0.94) | 0.027 | |
| 12.2 ± 9.5 | 17.6 ±10.1 | p< 0.0001 | p< 0.0001 | |||
| Infant | 173 (65%) | 45 (30%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Toddler | 66 (25%) | 72 (49%) | 4.19 (2.63; 6.70) | 3.98 (2.45; 6.46) | ||
| Child | 27 (10%) | 31 (21%) | 4.41 (2.40; 8.13) | 4.42 (2.36; 8.28) | ||
| 0.08 ±1.26 | 0.55 ±1.34 | 0.003 | 0.009 | |||
| Normal | 239 (90%) | 124 (84%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| MAM/SAM | 13 (5%) | 3 (2%) | 0.44 (0.12; 1.59) | 0.67 (0.18; 2.54) | ||
| Overweight | 14 (5%) | 21 (14%) | 2.89 (1.42; 5.88) | 3.21 (1.50; 6.90) | ||
| 0.010 | 0.498 | |||||
| At least sometimes water from well | 46 (17%) | 35 (24%) | 1 | |||
| Running water or from fountain only | 136 (51%) | 86 (58%) | 0.35 (0.18; 0.68) | |||
| Only pure water | 72 (27%) | 19 (13%) | 0.83 (0.50; 1.39) | |||
| Other (breastfeeding etc.) | 12 (5%) | 8 (5%) | 0.88 (0.32; 2.37) | |||
| 0.0005 | 0.741 | |||||
| Fingers only | 60 (23%) | 53 (37%) | 1 | |||
| Cutlery only | 144 (55%) | 51 (35%) | 2.07 (1.24; 3.46) | |||
| Both | 56 (22%) | 41 (28%) | 2.49 (1.53; 4.06) | |||
| 258 (97%) | 139 (94%) | 0.139 | 0.175 | |||
| 141 (53%) | 83 (56%) | 0.508 | 0.526 | |||
| 0.346 | 0.085 | |||||
| Lowest income | 19 (7%) | 15 (10%) | 1 | 1 | ||
| Middle income | 212 (80%) | 119 (80%) | 0.71 (0.35; 1.45) | 0.55 (0.25; 1.23) | ||
| Highest income | 35 (13%) | 14 (10%) | 0.51 (0.20; 1.27) | 0.31 (0.11; 0.88) | ||
| 106 (40%) | 71 (49%) | 0.119 | 0.805 | |||
| 29 (11%) | 28 (19%) | 1.91 (1.09; 3.35) | 0.025 | 0.370 | ||
| 17 (6%) | 15 (10%) | 0.175 | 0.801 | |||
| 41 (15%) | 20 (14%) | 0.384 | 0.390 | |||
| 13 (5%) | 3 (2%) | 0.151 | 0.148 | |||
| 11 (4%) | 3 (2%) | 0.253 | 0.253 | |||
| 17 (6%) | 18 (12%) | 2.32 (1.13; 4.75) | 0.022 | 2.04 (0.95; 4.41) | 0.069 | |
| 6 (2%) | 7 (5%) | 0.176 | 0.586 | |||
| 8 (3%) | 11 (7%) | 2.59 (1.02; 6.59) | 0.046 | 0.299 | ||
* OR adjusted for age category, gender, weight-for-height z-score, positive for bacterial culture
1 Mean ± standard deviation
2 as described in Breurec et al., PNTD 2016