| Literature DB >> 28793911 |
Susanna L Lundström1, Aase H Hensvold2,3, Dorothea Rutishauser4, Lars Klareskog2,3, A Jimmy Ytterberg4,2, Roman A Zubarev5, Anca I Catrina2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) is the standard first-line therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with variable clinical efficacy that is difficult to predict. The glycosylation status of immunoglobulin G (IgG) is altered in RA and influenced by MTX treatment. We aimed to further investigate if IgG glycosylation in untreated early RA can predict therapeutic response to MTX.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; Complement; Glycosylation; Immunoglobulin; Methotrexate; Rheumatoid arthritis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28793911 PMCID: PMC5549282 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-017-1389-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthritis Res Ther ISSN: 1478-6354 Impact factor: 5.156
Fig. 1Overview of study recruitment and data collection. ACR American College of Rheumatology, DAS28 Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, EULAR European League Against Rheumatism, MTX Methotrexate
Characteristics and of patients and healthy control subjects
| Healthy control subjects ( | Early RA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients ( | GR ( | MR ( | NR ( |
| ||
| Age, years | 54 (45–57) | 53 (45–62) | 49 (41–63) | 49 (41–56) | 55 (49–65) | 0.03 |
| Female sex | 73% | 72% | 68% | 65% | 80% | 0.28 |
| Current smoking | 10% | 34% | 31% | 30% | 30% | 0.52 |
| ACPA- and/or RF-positive | – | 75% | 74% | 75% | 75% | 0.96 |
| DAS28-ESR | – | 5.7 (5.0–6.2) | 5.2 (5.0–6.0) | 6.0 (5.4–6.4) | 5.2 (4.7–6.4) | 0.40 |
| HAQ | – | 1.3 (0.9–1.6) | 1.1 (0.8–1.4) | 1.4 (1.0–1.9) | 1.3 (0.9–1.6) | 0.66 |
| DAS28-ESR follow-up | – | 4.5 (2.6–5.1) | 2.2 (1.7–2.6) | 4.4 (4.0–4.9) | 5.4 (4.9–5.8) | <0.0001 |
| MTX duration, weeks | – | 14 (13–15) | 14 (13–15) | 14 (13–15) | 14 (14–15) | 0.50 |
| Prednisolone | – | 25% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 0.19 |
Abbreviations: ACPA Anticitrullinated protein antibodies, DAS28-ESR Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate, GR Good response, HAQ Health Assessment Questionnaire, MR Moderate response, MTX Methotrexate, NR No response, RA Rheumatoid arthritis, RF Rheumatoid factor
All characteristics are from assessments at baseline, except when otherwise stated. Values are of the median (first to third quartiles), except when otherwise indicated. Response was categorized according to European League Against Rheumatism response criteria
aComparison of patients not responding (no European League Against Rheumatism [EULAR] response) and patients responding (EULAR good or moderate response)
Fig. 2Distribution of galactosylated immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1)- and IgG2-fragment crystallizable (Fc) glycans. a Quantified glycan structures grouped as agalactosylated, (aGal) and galactosylated (Gal) glycans. Glycan nomenclature is according to Royle et al. [35]. The core oligosaccharide structure comprises a biantennary heptasaccharide moiety (A2). Usually, the first sugar unit (an N-acetylglucosamine) is additionally core-fucosylated (e.g., FA2). The biantennary structure can also be transected by an additional N-acetylglucosamine (FA2B). Furthermore, the outer glucosamine units can be elongated with galactoses (FA2Gn, n = 1 or 2), and the galactoses can be further extended with sialic acids (FA2GnSn, n = 1 or 2). b Distribution of galactosylated IgG1- and IgG2-Fc glycans at baseline in healthy control subjects and in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The relative distribution (%) of galactosylated Fc glycans differed significantly (p < 0.05) in healthy control subjects compared with patients with early RA and when comparing patients with good response and no response. Collectively, these data demonstrate a changed galactosylation pattern of Fc glycans in RA, with lower proportions of galactosylated glycans than their agalactosylated counterparts. The effect is most pronounced in IgG1. Following false discovery rate correction, p = 0.001 remains significant. C Complement protein, MR Moderate response
Immunoglobulin G fragment crystallizable glycan distribution of IgG1 and IgG2 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis prior to and following methotrexate treatment
| Type | Isotype | Glycana | Good responders | Moderate responders | Non responders | Intraindividual change | Interindividual differences | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prior/following | Prior | Following | |||||||||||
| Prior | Following | Prior | Following | Prior | Following | GR | MR | NR | (GR + MR)/NR | (GR + MR)/NR | |||
| IgG1 | Σ[Galactosylated glycans]b | 60 ± 12 | 63 ± 13 | 54 ± 13 | 57 ± 13 | 49 ± 12 | 47 ± 14 | 0.004 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0.001 | |
| Σ[Agalactosylated glycans]c | 40 ± 12 | 37 ± 13 | 46 ± 13 | 43 ± 13 | 51 ± 12 | 53 ± 14 | 0.004 | 0.03 | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0.001 | ||
| Σ[Afucosylated glycans]d | 4 ± 3 | 4 ± 3 | 3 ± 2 | 4 ± 2 | 3 ± 1 | 4 ± 2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1 | ||
| Σ[Bisected glycans]e | 12 ± 4 | 13 ± 4 | 12 ± 2 | 14 ± 3 | 13 ± 3 | 14 ± 5 | 0.2 | 0.0003 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1 | ||
| Σ[Sialylated glycans]f | 4 ± 4 | 4 ± 3 | 3 ± 2 | 4 ± 3 | 2 ± 2 | 3 ± 2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.04 | ||
| IgG2 | Σ[Galactosylated glycans]g | 52 ± 14 | 54 ± 15 | 45 ± 13 | 47 ± 13 | 40 ± 11 | 39 ± 11 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.01 | 0.003 | |
| Σ[Agalactosylated glycans]h | 48 ± 14 | 46 ± 15 | 55 ± 13 | 53 ± 13 | 60 ± 11 | 61 ± 11 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.01 | 0.003 | ||
| Σ[Bisected glycans]i | 7 ± 3 | 8 ± 3 | 6 ± 2 | 7 ± 3 | 7 ± 3 | 7 ± 3 | 0.01 | 0.004 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.5 | ||
| Σ[Sialylated glycans]j | 6 ± 5 | 6 ± 5 | 5 ± 3 | 5 ± 4 | 4 ± 2 | 4 ± 2 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.02 | 0.1 | ||
| aGal/Gal ratio | All IgG1 | Log [Σ(Agalactosylated glycans)/Σ(galactosylated glycans)] | −0.18 ± 0.24 | −0.25 ± 0.26 | −0.08 ± 0.25 | −0.14 ± 0.25 | 0.02 ± 0.21 | 0.05 ± 0.26 | 0.003 | 0.03 | 0.42 | 0.03 | 0.006 |
| All IgG2 | Log [Σ(agalactosylated glycans)/Σ(galactosylated glycans)] | −0.05 ± 0.26 | −0.07 ± 0.27 | 0.09 ± 0.24 | 0.05 ± 0.24 | 0.19 ± 0.21 | 0.20 ± 0.22 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 0.62 | 0.007 | 0.006 | |
| Main IgG1 | Log[FA2/(FA2G1 + FA2G2)] | −0.17 ± 0.21 | −0.24 ± 0.23 | −0.07 ± 0.23 | −0.13 ± 0.22 | 0.02 ± 0.20 | 0.05 ± 0.24 | 0.001 | 0.02 | 0.4 | 0.02 | 0.001 | |
| Main IgG2 | Log[FA2/(FA2G1 + FA2G2)] | 0.02 ± 0.23 | −0.05 ± 0.24 | 0.11 ± 0.23 | 0.06 ± 0.21 | 0.20 ± 0.21 | 0.22 ± 0.20 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 0.6 | 0.02 | 0.001 | |
| Bisected IgG1 | Log[FA2B/(FA2BG1 + FA2BG2)] | −0.15 ± 0.29 | −0.21 ± 0.29 | −0.08 ± 0.26 | −0.12 ± 0.25 | 0.06 ± 0.24 | 0.07 ± 0.26 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.02 | 0.002 | |
| Bisected IgG2 | Log[FA2B/FA2BG1] | 0.40 ± 0.35 | 0.35 ± 0.42 | 0.68 ± 0.48 | 0.52 ± 0.46 | 0.76 ± 0.38 | 0.70 ± 0.29 | 0.4 | 0.03 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.02 | |
| Afucosylated IgG1 | Log[A2/(A2G1 + A2G2)] | −0.51 ± 0.62 | −0.72 ± 0.71 | −0.36 ± 0.59 | −0.53 ± 0.58 | −0.17 ± 0.56 | −0.19 ± 0.56 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.01 | |
Abbreviations: aGal/Gal Ratio between agalactosylated and galactosylated glycans, GR Good response, MR Moderate response, NR No response
Patients are grouped according to response to MTX. Figures are given for average values (%) ± SD. p Values <0.02 remained significant following false discovery rate correction
aGlycan abbreviations are provided in Fig. 2a legend
bΣ[IgG1: A2G1, A2G2, FA2G1, FA2BG1, FA2G1S1, FA2G2, FA2BG2, FA2G2S1]
cΣ[IgG1: FA2, FA2B, A2 and A2B]
dΣ[IgG1: A2, A2B, A2G1, A2G2]
eΣ[IgG1: A2B, FA2B, FA2BG1, FA2BG2]
fΣ[IgG1: FA2G1S1, FA2G2S1]
gΣ[IgG2: FA2G1, FA2BG1, FA2G2, FA2G1S1, FA2G2, FA2G2S1]
hΣ[IgG2: FA2, FA2B]
iΣ[IgG2: FA2B, FA2BG1]
jΣ[IgG2: FA2G1S1, FA2G2S1]
Fig. 3Multivariate model based on baseline information of the patients prior to methotrexate treatment. a Principal component analysis (PCA) score plot. The majority of patients with no response to treatment (NR, dark circles) cluster together along component 1 (x-axis). This indicates that there are factors at baseline that are characteristic for this patient group within the model. b The orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) loading plot of the same data reveals which factors these are. The error bars represent the range of each marker’s value (with >95% confidence). Features that are positive correlate with no response, features that are negative correlate with response. Shown are only the features correlating with 95% confidence. For details of the complete model, see Additional file 1: Table S7. C Complement protein, CF Complement factor, FA2 Main agalactosylated Fc glycan, FA2G1 Main monogalactosylated Fc glycan, FA2G2 Main digalactosylated Fc glycan, GR Good response, MR Moderate response, NR No response
Predictive value of immunoglobulin G1 log10[FA2/(FA2G2 + FA2G2)] as a response biomarkera
| Test | Result | NR | GR + MR | Sensitivity (nonresponse) (95% CI) | Specificity (response) (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients | FA2/(FA2G2 + FA2G2)-IgG1 | Positive | 14 | 12 | 70% (46–88) | 69% (52–83) | 5.3 (1.6–17.0) |
| Negative | 6 | 27 | |||||
| ACPA+ and/or RF+ | FA2/(FA2G2 + FA2G2)-IgG1 | Positive | 11 | 6 | 73% (45–92) | 79% (60–92) | 10.5 (2.5–45) |
| Negative | 4 | 23 | |||||
Abbreviations: ACPA Anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibody, FA2 Main agalactosylated, FA2G1 Main monogalactosylated Fc glycan, FA2G2 Main digalactosylated Fc, GR Good response, IgG1 Immunoglobulin G1, MR Moderate response, NR No response, RF Rheumatoid factor
aCutoff −0.045
Fig. 4The log[FA2/(FA2G1 + FA2G2)] value of immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) as a predictive factor for response. a Good (GR) and moderate responders (MR) compared with patients with no response (NR) to methotrexate treatment. Patients are split into seropositive (Pos) and seronegative (Neg) groups. Cutoff −0.045. b ROC curve for distinguishing the responding and nonresponding patient cohorts. c ROC curve for distinguishing the responding and nonresponding patient cohorts when only seropositive patients were included. Following false discovery rate correction, p = 0.001 remains significant. FA2 Main agalactosylated, FA2G1 Main monogalactosylated Fc glycan, FA2G2 Main digalactosylated Fc, NS Not significant