Literature DB >> 23589346

In silico instrumental response correction improves precision of label-free proteomics and accuracy of proteomics-based predictive models.

Yaroslav Lyutvinskiy1, Hongqian Yang, Dorothea Rutishauser, Roman A Zubarev.   

Abstract

In the analysis of proteome changes arising during the early stages of a biological process (e.g. disease or drug treatment) or from the indirect influence of an important factor, the biological variations of interest are often small (∼10%). The corresponding requirements for the precision of proteomics analysis are high, and this often poses a challenge, especially when employing label-free quantification. One of the main contributors to the inaccuracy of label-free proteomics experiments is the variability of the instrumental response during LC-MS/MS runs. Such variability might include fluctuations in the electrospray current, transmission efficiency from the air-vacuum interface to the detector, and detection sensitivity. We have developed an in silico post-processing method of reducing these variations, and have thus significantly improved the precision of label-free proteomics analysis. For abundant blood plasma proteins, a coefficient of variation of approximately 1% was achieved, which allowed for sex differentiation in pooled samples and ≈90% accurate differentiation of individual samples by means of a single LC-MS/MS analysis. This method improves the precision of measurements and increases the accuracy of predictive models based on the measurements. The post-acquisition nature of the correction technique and its generality promise its widespread application in LC-MS/MS-based methods such as proteomics and metabolomics.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23589346      PMCID: PMC3734588          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.O112.023804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  15 in total

1.  Effects of salt concentration on analyte response using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  T L Constantopoulos; G S Jackson; C G Enke
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Identification and relative quantitation of protein mixtures by enzymatic digestion followed by capillary reversed-phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Pavel V Bondarenko; Dirk Chelius; Thomas A Shaler
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Flexing the electrified meniscus: the birth of a jet in electrosprays.

Authors:  Ioan Marginean; Lida Parvin; Linda Heffernan; Akos Vertes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  A proteomic approach for quantitation of phosphorylation using stable isotope labeling in cell culture.

Authors:  Nieves Ibarrola; Dario E Kalume; Mads Gronborg; Akiko Iwahori; Akhilesh Pandey
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  SprayQc: a real-time LC-MS/MS quality monitoring system to maximize uptime using off the shelf components.

Authors:  Richard A Scheltema; Matthias Mann
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Proteome profiling reveals gender differences in the composition of human serum.

Authors:  Koichiro Miike; Masashi Aoki; Ryo Yamashita; Yumiko Takegawa; Hideyuki Saya; Teruhisa Miike; Ken-ichi Yamamura
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  Electrospray diagnostics by Fourier analysis of current oscillations and fast imaging.

Authors:  Lida Parvin; Marsha C Galicia; Jennifer M Gauntt; Leah M Carney; Ann B Nguyen; Eunyoung Park; Linda Heffernan; Akos Vertes
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 8.  Comparison of a Salmonella typhimurium proteome defined by shotgun proteomics directly on an LTQ-FT and by proteome pre-fractionation on an LCQ-DUO.

Authors:  Brook L Nunn; Scott A Shaffer; Alexander Scherl; Byron Gallis; Manhong Wu; Samuel I Miller; David R Goodlett
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic       Date:  2006-06

9.  A proteomics strategy to elucidate functional protein-protein interactions applied to EGF signaling.

Authors:  Blagoy Blagoev; Irina Kratchmarova; Shao-En Ong; Mogens Nielsen; Leonard J Foster; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Post-acquisition ETD spectral processing for increased peptide identifications.

Authors:  David M Good; Craig D Wenger; Graeme C McAlister; Dina L Bai; Donald F Hunt; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.109

View more
  34 in total

1.  DeMix-Q: Quantification-Centered Data Processing Workflow.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Lukas Käll; Roman A Zubarev
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Optimizing Recombinant Protein Production in the Escherichia coli Periplasm Alleviates Stress.

Authors:  Thomas Baumgarten; A Jimmy Ytterberg; Roman A Zubarev; Jan-Willem de Gier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Multi-omics Analysis Reveals Sequential Roles for ABA during Seed Maturation.

Authors:  Frédéric Chauffour; Marlène Bailly; François Perreau; Gwendal Cueff; Hiromi Suzuki; Boris Collet; Anne Frey; Gilles Clément; Ludivine Soubigou-Taconnat; Thierry Balliau; Anja Krieger-Liszkay; Loïc Rajjou; Annie Marion-Poll
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Citrullination Controls Dendritic Cell Transdifferentiation into Osteoclasts.

Authors:  Akilan Krishnamurthy; A Jimmy Ytterberg; Meng Sun; Koji Sakuraba; Johanna Steen; Vijay Joshua; Nataliya K Tarasova; Vivianne Malmström; Heidi Wähämaa; Bence Réthi; Anca I Catrina
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  ANPELA: analysis and performance assessment of the label-free quantification workflow for metaproteomic studies.

Authors:  Jing Tang; Jianbo Fu; Yunxia Wang; Bo Li; Yinghong Li; Qingxia Yang; Xuejiao Cui; Jiajun Hong; Xiaofeng Li; Yuzong Chen; Weiwei Xue; Feng Zhu
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  CDK and MAPK Synergistically Regulate Signaling Dynamics via a Shared Multi-site Phosphorylation Region on the Scaffold Protein Ste5.

Authors:  María Victoria Repetto; Matthew J Winters; Alan Bush; Wolfgang Reiter; David Maria Hollenstein; Gustav Ammerer; Peter M Pryciak; Alejandro Colman-Lerner
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Phosphorylation of Leukotriene C4 Synthase at Serine 36 Impairs Catalytic Activity.

Authors:  Shabbir Ahmad; A Jimmy Ytterberg; Madhuranayaki Thulasingam; Fredrik Tholander; Tomas Bergman; Roman Zubarev; Anders Wetterholm; Agnes Rinaldo-Matthis; Jesper Z Haeggström
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Brain proteomics supports the role of glutamate metabolism and suggests other metabolic alterations in protein l-isoaspartyl methyltransferase (PIMT)-knockout mice.

Authors:  Hongqian Yang; Jonathan D Lowenson; Steven Clarke; Roman A Zubarev
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Label-free quantitative mass spectrometry reveals novel pathways involved in LL-37 expression.

Authors:  Andreas Cederlund; Frank Nylén; Erica Miraglia; Peter Bergman; Gudmundur H Gudmundsson; Birgitta Agerberth
Journal:  J Innate Immun       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 7.349

10.  Development of autoantibodies against muscle-specific FHL1 in severe inflammatory myopathies.

Authors:  Inka Albrecht; Cecilia Wick; Åsa Hallgren; Anna Tjärnlund; Kanneboyina Nagaraju; Felipe Andrade; Kathryn Thompson; William Coley; Aditi Phadke; Lina-Marcela Diaz-Gallo; Matteo Bottai; Inger Nennesmo; Karine Chemin; Jessica Herrath; Karin Johansson; Anders Wikberg; A Jimmy Ytterberg; Roman A Zubarev; Olof Danielsson; Olga Krystufkova; Jiri Vencovsky; Nils Landegren; Marie Wahren-Herlenius; Leonid Padyukov; Olle Kämpe; Ingrid E Lundberg
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.