| Literature DB >> 28793636 |
Dai Tang1, Longnan Li2, Majid Shahbabaei3, Yeong-Eun Yoo4, Daejoong Kim5.
Abstract
Water transport through aquaporin water channels occurs extensively in cell membranes. Hourglass-shaped (biconical) pores resemble the geometry of these aquaporin channels and therefore attract much research attention. We assumed that hourglass-shaped nanopores are capable of high water permeation like biological aquaporins. In order to prove the assumption, we investigated nanoscale water transport through a model hourglass-shaped pore using molecular dynamics simulations while varying the angle of the conical entrance and the total nanopore length. The results show that a minimal departure from optimized cone angle (e.g., 9° for 30 Å case) significantly increases the osmotic permeability and that there is a non-linear relationship between permeability and the cone angle. The analysis of hydrodynamic resistance proves that the conical entrance helps to reduce the hydrodynamic entrance hindrance. Our numerical and analytical results thus confirm our initial assumption and suggest that fast water transport can be achieved by adjusting the cone angle and length of an hourglass-shaped nanopore.Entities:
Keywords: cone angle; hourglass-shaped pore; hydrodynamic permeability; molecular dynamics
Year: 2015 PMID: 28793636 PMCID: PMC5458919 DOI: 10.3390/ma8115380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Schematic representation of the molecular dynamics simulation model. The narrowest center diameter d is fixed at 3 Å. We varied the total length of the hourglass-shaped pore L and the cone angle α.
Figure 2The number density distribution of water molecules inside the pore along the axial direction for p = 10.03 katm. The center of the pore is located at z = 30 Å.
Figure 3Difference between the location of adjacent water molecules along the axial direction of the pore and the center z position of the maximum difference.
Figure 4Osmotic permeability of water through the pores versus the cone angle α.
Figure 5Comparison of the hydrodynamic resistance from analytical model and that from the molecular dynamics simulations (a) L = 30 Å; (b) L = 60 Å.
Figure 6Factor C hydrodynamic resistance from analytical modeling under the partial-slip boundary condition with b = 72 nm. The magnitude of factor C for cylinder nanopores with length of 20 Å (aquaporin water channels), 30 Å and 60 Å are highlighted with the pink dots.