Literature DB >> 21730759

Modeling the conductance and DNA blockade of solid-state nanopores.

Stefan W Kowalczyk1, Alexander Y Grosberg, Yitzhak Rabin, Cees Dekker.   

Abstract

We present measurements and theoretical modeling of the ionic conductance G of solid-state nanopores with 5-100 nm diameters, with and without DNA inserted into the pore. First, we show that it is essential to include access resistance to describe the conductance, in particular for larger pore diameters. We then present an exact solution for G of an hourglass-shaped pore, which agrees very well with our measurements without any adjustable parameters, and which is an improvement over the cylindrical approximation. Subsequently we discuss the conductance blockade ΔG due to the insertion of a DNA molecule into the pore, which we study experimentally as a function of pore diameter. We find that ΔG decreases with pore diameter, contrary to the predictions of earlier models that forecasted a constant ΔG. We compare three models for ΔG, all of which provide good agreement with our experimental data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21730759     DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/22/31/315101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanotechnology        ISSN: 0957-4484            Impact factor:   3.874


  85 in total

1.  Resistive pulse sensing of magnetic beads and supraparticle structures using tunable pores.

Authors:  Geoff R Willmott; Mark Platt; Gil U Lee
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 2.  Decoding DNA, RNA and peptides with quantum tunnelling.

Authors:  Massimiliano Di Ventra; Masateru Taniguchi
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Magnetic microbead transport during resistive pulse sensing.

Authors:  Geoff R Willmott; Matthew G Fisk; James Eldridge
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Conductance-Based Determination of Solid-State Nanopore Size and Shape: An Exploration of Performance Limits.

Authors:  Cameron M Frament; Jason R Dwyer
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.126

5.  Solid-state nanopore localization by controlled breakdown of selectively thinned membranes.

Authors:  Autumn T Carlsen; Kyle Briggs; Adam R Hall; Vincent Tabard-Cossa
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.874

6.  Electrical pulse fabrication of graphene nanopores in electrolyte solution.

Authors:  Aaron T Kuan; Bo Lu; Ping Xie; Tamas Szalay; Jene A Golovchenko
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Smooth DNA transport through a narrowed pore geometry.

Authors:  Spencer Carson; James Wilson; Aleksei Aksimentiev; Meni Wanunu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Resistive amplitude fingerprints during translocation of linear molecules through charged solid-state nanopores.

Authors:  Sebastian Sensale; Ceming Wang; Hsueh-Chia Chang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 9.  Nanopore Sensing.

Authors:  Wenqing Shi; Alicia K Friedman; Lane A Baker
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Aβ42 assembles into specific β-barrel pore-forming oligomers in membrane-mimicking environments.

Authors:  Montserrat Serra-Batiste; Martí Ninot-Pedrosa; Mariam Bayoumi; Margarida Gairí; Giovanni Maglia; Natàlia Carulla
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.