| Literature DB >> 28792980 |
Sonja Siljak-Yakovlev1, Bernard Godelle2, Vlatka Zoldos3, Joan Vallès4, Teresa Garnatje5, Oriane Hidalgo6.
Abstract
In this study we showed that constitutive heterochromatin, GC-rich DNA and rDNA are implicated in chromosomal rearrangements during the basic chromosome number changing (dysploidy) in Reichardia genus. This small Mediterranean genus comprises 8-10 species and presents three basic chromosome numbers (x = 9, 8 and 7). To assess genome evolution and differentiation processes, studies were conducted in a dysploid series of six species: R. dichotoma, R. macrophylla and R. albanica (2n = 18), R. tingitana and R. gaditana (2n = 16), and R. picroides (2n = 14). The molecular phylogeny reconstruction comprised three additional species (R. crystallina and R. ligulata, 2n = 16 and R. intermedia, 2n = 14). Our results indicate that the way of dysploidy is descending. During this process, a positive correlation was observed between chromosome number and genome size, rDNA loci number and pollen size, although only the correlation between chromosome number and genome size is still recovered significant once considering the phylogenetic effect. Fluorescent in situ hybridisation also evidenced changes in number, position and organisation of two rDNA families (35S and 5S), including the reduction of loci number and, consequently, reduction in the number of secondary constrictions and nuclear organising regions from three to one per diploid genome. The potential mechanisms of chromosomal and genome evolution, strongly implicating heterochromatin, are proposed and discussed, with particular consideration for Reichardia genus.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28792980 PMCID: PMC5549912 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182318
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Origin of studied species and populations.
Vouchers are deposited in the following herbaria. BCN: Centre de Documentació de Biodiversitat Vegetal, Universitat de Barcelona. BC: Institut Botànic de Barcelona. BEOU: University of Belgrade. SY: Sonja Siljak-Yakovlev (personal collection), Orsay.
| Species | Locality | Collectors and herbarium where voucher is deposited |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Mountain pass Tigranashen and Sovetashen, Armenia | G. Fajvush, E. Gabrielian, N. Garcia-Jacas, M. Hovanyssian, A. Susanna, J. Vallès (BCN) | |
| 2. Marand, Iran | N. Garcia-Jacas, A. Susanna, V. Mozaffarian, J. Vallès (BCN) | |
| 3. Mt Ehden, Lebanon | S. Siljak-Yakovlev, M. Bou Dagher-Kharrat, (SY) | |
| 4. Near Konjic, Bosnia & Herzegovina | S. Siljak-Yakovlev (SY) | |
| 5. Diva Grabovica, Bosnia & Herzegovina | ||
| 6. Mt Orjen, Montenegro | ||
| 7. Lastva, Bosnia & Herzegovina | ||
| 8. Sutjeska canyon, Bosnia & Herzegovina | ||
| 9. Mali i Cikes, Llogara, Albania | D. Lakušić, N. Kuzmanović, M. Lazarevic, A. Alegro, F. Conti (BEOU) | |
| 10. Canary Islands, Spain | From Puerto de la Cruz botanic garden (SY) | |
| 11. Oriola, Spain | J. Vallès (BCN) | |
| 12. Portugal | M. Queirós (from Coimbra botanical garden) (SY) | |
| 13. Porís de Abona,Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain | A. Santos-Guerra, J. Vallès (BCN) | |
| 14. Punta de Teno,Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain | A. Santos-Guerra, J. Vallès (BCN) | |
| 15. Roque de las Bodegas, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain | A. Santos-Guerra, J. Vallès (BCN) | |
| 16. Andén Verde, Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain | A. Santos-Guerra, J. Vallès (BCN) | |
| 17. Oran, Algeria | K. Abdeddaim (SY) | |
| 18. Spain | T. Garnatje (from Barcelona botanical garden) (BC) | |
| 19. Gornji Okrug, Dalmatia, Croatia | S. Siljak-Yakovlev (SY) | |
| 20. Dubrovnik, Dalmatia, Croatia | ||
| 21. Lavandou, Côte d’Azur, France |
DNA content and GC percentage of Reichardia species from different populations.
| Species (2 | Population number (see | 2C DNA in pg | 1C | GC% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.20 (0.04; 1.23) | 2543 | 40.7 | |
| 2 | 5.08 (0.03; 0.79) | 2484 | 40.4 | |
| 3 | 5.54 (0.07; 0.83) | 2709 | ||
| Mean for species | ||||
| 4 | 5.25 (0.04; 3.66) [ | 2567 | ||
| 5 | 5.13 (0.10; 0.77) | 2509 | ||
| 6 | 5.20 (0.09; 0.75) | 2543 | ||
| 7 | 5.10 (0.10; 0.66) [ | 2494 | 40.9 | |
| 8 | 5.05 (0.07; 0.79) | 2469 | ||
| Mean for species | ||||
| 9 | 5.22 (0.02; 0.43) [ | 2553 | ||
| 10 | 3.50 (0.07; 0.83) [ | 1712 | 40.5 | |
| 11 | 3.23 (0.02; 0.58) | 1579 | ||
| Mean for species | ||||
| 12 | 3.40 (0.08; 0.67) [ | 1663 | 41.2 | |
| 13 | 3.43 (0.08; 2.35) [ | 1677 | - | |
| 14 | 3.84 (0.32; 2.42) [ | 1878 | ||
| 15 | 3.62 (0.14; 2.29) [ | 1770 | ||
| 16 | 3.95 (0.50; 2.73) [ | 1932 | ||
| Barranco de Roque | 3.78 (0.01; 2.21) [ | 1852 | ||
| Bermejo [ | ||||
| Mean for species | ||||
| 17 | 2.90 (0.02; 1.11) [ | 1418 | ||
| 18 | 2.93 (0.04; 1.24) | 1433 | ||
| Mean for species | ||||
| 19 | 2.90 (0.05; 0.45) | 1418 | 39.4 | |
| 20 | 3.00 (0.03; 0.78) [ | 1467 | 39.5 | |
| 21 | 2.86 (0.02; 0.38) | 1399 | 39.9 | |
| Mean for species |
aMean value for population; SD = standard deviation; CV = coefficient of variation
Distribution of DAPI bands after FISH experiment.
| Species (2 | Centromeric region | Pericentromeric region | Paracentromeric region | Intercalary band | Terminal band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| pairs 3, 5 | 0 | pair 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| all pairs | pair 3 | 0 | 0 | pair 1 | |
| all pairs | pair 1 | 0 | pairs 3, 8 | 0 | |
| all pairs | 0 | pairs 1, 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| all pairs | 0 | pairs 1, 6 | 0 | 0 |
pair = chromosome pair,
aentire DAPI positive chromosome arm comprising secondary constriction,
bentire DAPI positive chromosome arm except satellite
Fig 1Metaphase chromosome plates and interphase nuclei of Reichardia species after double target FISH with 5S (red signals) and 35S (green signals) rDNA loci, CMA (yellow signals) and DAPI staining (blue): R. dichotoma showing 5S and 35S colocalised loci at both sites of intercalary secondary constriction (arrows and arrowheads) and four terminal 35S signals (A); R. macrophylla with 4 terminal 35S signals and two intercalary and two terminal 5S signals (B); R. tingitana showing four colocalised 5S and 35S signals (C), numerous CMA+ bands in metaphase chromosomes and interphase nucleus (D), nucleus after FISH with four 35S/5S spots (E); R. gaditana with four terminal 35S (two being very intense) and two intercalary 5S signals (F); R. picroides showing two terminal sat 35S on long chromosome arms and two intercalary 5S signals on short arms (G), DAPI+ centromeric bands and DAPI negative satellites (arrows) in the same metaphase plate as FISH, better visible on black and white photograph (G’) and CMA+ satellites (arrows) corresponding to 35S and intercalary bands (arrowheads) that corresponds to 5S signals (H). Scale bar 10 μm. Idiograms of R. dichotoma (A’), R. macrophylla (B’), R. tingitana (C’), R. gaditana (F’), R. picroides (G”) showing distribution of CMA+ (yellow) and DAPI+ (blue) bands, 35S (green) and 5S (red) rDNA signals.
Number and distribution of CMA+ bands in diploid chromosome set.
| Species (2 | Total CMA+ bands number | Intercalary bands in SC | Terminal bands | Satellite SC | Intercalary bands | PC bands |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | pair 1 | 0 | pairs 3, 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | pairs 4, 7 | 0 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | pairs 1, 3 | pair 2 | pair 2 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | pair 8 | pair 8 | 0 | pair 5 | |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | pair 4 | pairs 1, 2 | pair 6 | |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | pair 4 | pairs 1, 2 | pair 6 |
pair = chromosome pair,
*entire short chromosome arm,
PC = paracentromeric bands
Number and position of 35S and 5S rDNA loci.
| Species (2 | 35S rDNA loci | 5S rDNA loci | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| number | position | number | position | |
| 3 | pair 1 –intercalary on both sides of SC;pairs 3 and 6 –sat SCs | 1 | pair 1 –intercalary on both sides of SC | |
| 2 | pairs 4 and 7 –sat SCs | 2 | pair 3 –intercalary; pair 8 –terminal | |
| 2 | pairs 2 and 3 –sat SCs | 2 | pairs 2 and 3 –sat SCs | |
| 2 | pair 5 –terminal; pair 8 –sat SC | 1 | pair 5 –intercalary | |
| 1 | pair 4 –sat SC long arm | 1 | pair 2 –intercalary | |
| 1 | pair 4 –sat SC long arm | 1 | pair 2 –intercalary | |
Fig 2Hypothetical schema of overarching karyotype evolution in the genus Reichardia involving heterochromatin, rDNA and genome size changes during descending dysploidy.
Comparison among data concerning genome size, total length of diploid chromosome set, pollen grain dimensions and Giemsa C-bands.
| Species | 2 | 2C DNA (pg) | TKL | Pollen size (μm) [ | Number of Giemsa C-bands [ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E | P | |||||
| 18 | 5.27 | 67.92 (0.35) | 40.52 (0.55) 44–39 | 35.60 (0.50) 38–34 | 6 | |
| 18 | 5.15 | 83.32 (0.55) | 38.28 (0.53) 40–36 | 32.12 (0.63)37-30 | 18 | |
| 18 | 5.22 | 56.60 (0.27) | - | - | - | |
| 16 | 3.37 | 55.32 (0.40) | 33.16 (0.42) 35–32 | 28.16 (0.43) 30–27 | 24 | |
| 16 | 3.40 | 51.54 (0.35) | 34.84 (0.39) 36–33 | 30.04 (0.37) 31–28 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2.92 | 51.70 (0.30) | 31.72 (0.45) 34–30 | 26.72 (0.44) 30–25 | 16 | |
TKL = total karyotype length (2n);
E = pollen equatorial diameter;
P = pollen polar axis;
standard deviation;
Max—Min of E and P.
Fig 3Majority-rule consensus phylogeny of post-burn trees of Reichardia obtained through Bayesian analysis of the ITS dataset, plotted on geographic map and showing reconstruction of ancestral genome size and chromosome number.
Posterior probabilities are indicated on branches. Values in boxes represent the ancestral genome sizes and their corresponding variances. Dots on the map depict the origin of the sequenced samples. Data on the presence of Reichardia species across Mediterranean countries were retrieved from Euro+Med [7] for R. gaditana, from Blamey and Grey-Wilson [4] for R. intermedia and for R. macrophylla and R. albanica from Conti et al. [1].
Phylogenetic generalised least squares (PGLS) regression statistics between somatic chromosome number (2n) and other cytogenetic and pollen traits.
| Pagel (λ = 0) | Brownian motion (λ = 1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slope | Slope | |||
| CMA | -0.1122 | 0.4345 | -0.2765 | 0.1402 |
| 35S | 0.2326 | 0.0464* | 0.1966 | 0.0683 |
| 5S | 0.0925 | 0.5793 | 0.022 | 0.7728 |
| TKL | 0.4116 | 0.0864 | 0.3334 | 0.2017 |
| 2C | 0.3649 | 0.0145* | 0.3987 | 0.0164* |
| P | 0.8672 | 0.0284* | 0.6651 | 0.1171 |
| E | 0.9659 | 0.0194* | 0.7851 | 0.0946 |
| GC | 4.7031 | 0.2132 | 2.2225 | 0.3742 |
| AS | 1.2811 | 0.2472 | 0.2703 | 0.6165 |
| R | -0.128 | 0.5787 | -0.3145 | 0.4849 |
CMA: chromomycin-positive regions; 35S: 35S rDNA loci; 5S: 5S rDNA loci; TKL: total karyotype length; 2C: holoploid genome size; P: pollen grain polar axis; E: pollen grain equatorial diameter; GC: percentage of GC bases; AS: chromosome asymmetry index; R: chromosome arm ratio. Significance: *P < 0.05.
Fig 4Karyological, cytogenetic and pollen traits plotted on the Reichardia phylogeny.
Posterior probabilities are indicated on branches.
Fig 5Hypothetical schema of the implication of heterochromatin in chromosomal restructuring during reduction of the basic chromosome number and decrease of DNA content.