Literature DB >> 28791394

Identification of key genes and pathways associated with classical Hodgkin lymphoma by bioinformatics analysis.

Zhixing Kuang1, Li Guo1, Xun Li1.   

Abstract

The current study aimed to explore the mechanisms associated with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) to identify novel diagnostic and therapeutic targets. The GES12453 microarray dataset was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database; the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between cHL samples and normal B cell samples by were identified using the limma package. Gene ontology (GO) and pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs gene were performed. Furthermore, construction and analysis of protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network was performed, and co‑expression modules of DEGs were produced. A total of 450 DEGs were identified, comprising 216 upregulated and 234 downregulated genes in cHL compared with normal B cell samples. The DEGs were enriched in biological processes associated with immune response. The upregulated genes were mainly associated with the pathway of transcriptional misregulation in cancer, while downregulated genes were associated with B cell receptor signaling. PPI network analysis demonstrated that IL6 had the highest connectivity degree. Interleukin‑6 (IL6) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) were demonstrated to be involved with the response to cytokine GO term in co‑expression module 1. Spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK), B‑cell linker protein (BLNK), CD79B, phospholipase C γ2 (PLCG2) were enriched in the B cell receptor signaling pathway in module 2. Matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9), protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type C had the highest connectivity degrees in module 3 and module 4, respectively. The results suggested that DEGs, including IL6, STAT1, MMP9, SYK, BLNK, PLCG2 and CD79B, and the pathways of B cell receptor signaling, Epstein‑Barr virus infection and transcriptional misregulation in cancer have strong potential to be useful as targets for diagnosis or treatment of cHL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28791394      PMCID: PMC5647037          DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Med Rep        ISSN: 1791-2997            Impact factor:   2.952


Introduction

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is a germinal center-derived B-cell neoplasm characterized by a small number of tumor cells in a wide range of reactive infiltrating cells. cHL accounts for ~95% of HL cases (1). The incidence of the HL is 2.8 per 100,000 individuals (2). It was estimated that 8,500 people in the United States would be diagnosed with HL and 1,120 mortalities would be caused by HL in 2016 (3). Currently, cHL treatments include cytotoxic chemotherapy and involved-field radiation therapy. These treatments significantly reduce the mortality rate and produce a 5-year overall survival rate of 70–80%; however, ~20% of patients still develop progressive disease following these treatments (4). However, the pathogenesis of cHL is multifactorial and complex, therefore, improving the understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of cHL is important for identification of novel therapeutic targets. In recent years, the pathogenic mechanisms of cHL have been extensively investigated; for example, CD30 has been demonstrated to be expressed on Hodgkin and Reed/Sternberg (HRS) cells in cHL and involved in development of cHL. The monoclonal antibody against CD30, termed Brentuximab vedotin, has been demonstrated to be a highly effective treatment for relapsed/refractory cHL (5), which supports that it is important to identify more potential targets for the treatment of cHL. Microarray analysis has become an extensively used tool for the generation of gene expression data on a genomic scale. In the current study, GSE12453 microarray data from Brune et al (6) was downloaded. Brune et al (6) investigated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) among cHL, B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and normal B cell samples (6,7). In the current study, DEGs were identified by comparing cHL and normal B cells samples, and gene function enrichment analysis, protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction and co-expression sub-network construction were performed to identify the molecular markers of cHL. The results of the current study present candidate genes for future research into the pathogenic mechanisms of cHL and may help to establish novel diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets.

Materials and methods

Microarray data

The raw data of GSE12453 based on the GPL570 platform (HG-U133_Plus_2) contributed by Brune et al (6) were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). The GSE12453 dataset comprises 67 samples, including 12 cHL samples, 5 nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma samples, 25 non-Hodgkin lymphoma samples and 25 normal B cells samples. The normal B cell samples are further divided into five subtypes: Normal naive B cells, normal memory B cells, normal centrocytes, normal centroblasts and normal plasma cells. Research has previously identified that HRS cells originate from germinal center (GC) B cells (8), which contain centrocytes and centroblasts (9). Under normal circumstances, GCB cells differentiate into memory B cells or plasma cells; however, GCB cells can transform into malignant B cells. Therefore, in the current study, the cHL samples and the normal B cell samples, which included GCB cells, memory B cells and plasma cells, were used for analysis.

Data preprocessing and differential expression analysis

Several R packages was used for raw microarray data preprocessing, including concluding quality assessment (QA), quality control (QC), background correction and normalization. The R packages using for QA/QC were simpleaffy (10), affyPLM and arrayQualityMetrics (11). Through QC checks, the sample GSM312887 within the dataset was disqualified (Fig. 1) and excluded from subsequent analysis. Robust multi-array average (RMA) (12) was used to perform background correction, normalization and probe summarization. The empirical Bayesian method in limma package (13) was used to perform the differential analysis, |log2 fold change (FC)| >2.5 and adjusted P<0.001 were considered as statistically significant.
Figure 1.

Box plot of expression data before and after normalization. The x-axis presents the different samples and the y-axis presents the expression value. The black line in each box represents the expression median for each sample. (A) Data before normalization and (B) data after normalization. After preprocessing, the expression medians were similar across samples, except for GSM312887.

Gene ontology (GO) and pathway enrichment analyses

GO is a popular approach to categorize the representation of genes and the attributes of gene expression. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG; http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) (14) is an online database with collected information of genomes, biological chemicals and enzymatic pathways. Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID; https://david-d.ncifcrf.gov/), is an exploratory visualization tool that help investigators determine the biological function a series of genes. To understand the function of the DEGs, the GO and pathway enrichment analyses were performed by using DAVID 6.8 (Beta) online tool, the threshold was set as P<0.01.

PPI network and co-expression module construction

The Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING 10.0) is a database that was designed to predict the PPI between DEGs (15) and combination score >0.4 was considered to be significant. Cytoscape software was used to visualize the results of the PPI network (16), the sub-networks of co-expression were constructed by ClusterONE (17) at the base of PPI network. ClusterONE is the plug-in component of Cytoscape designed to identify closely connected and potentially overlapping regions in the PPI network (ClusterONE parameters: Minimum size, 3; minimum density, 0; overlap threshold, 0.8). GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of modular genes was implemented using the DAVID online tool.

Results

DEGs between Hodgkin lymphoma and normal B cells

A total of 450 DEGs were obtained from analysis of the dataset GSE12453, of which 214 were upregulated and 234 were downregulated genes. The distribution of DEGs is presented in Fig. 2.
Figure 2.

Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes in classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Red, significantly upregulated genes; green, significantly downregulated genes. FC, fold change.

GO and pathway enrichment analyses

Analysis of GO and pathway enrichment for upregulated and downregulated genes was performed. The top three GO terms of functional classification are presented in Table I. The results indicated that upregulated DEGs primarily were involved in the GO terms relevant to immune response (P=8.10×10−29), defense response (P=1.81×10−19) and cell activation (P=2.13×10−18). The GO terms predominantly associated with downregulated DEGs were the B cell receptor signaling pathway (P=2.61×10−15), B cell activation (P=1.10×10−11) and antigen receptor-mediated signaling pathway (P=5.08×10−10).
Table I.

GO enrichment analysis for differentially expressed genes.

A, Upregulated genes

TermCountP-value
GOTERM_BP_FAT
  GO:0006955 immune response738.10×10−29
  GO:0006952 defense response641.81×10−19
  GO:0001775 cell activation462.13×10−18
GOTERM_CC_FAT
  GO:0005615 extracellular space491.56×10−13
  GO:0009897 external side of plasma membrane195.93×10−10
  GO:0005576 extracellular region864.44×10−9
GOTERM_MF_FAT
  GO:0008009 chemokine activity84.51×10−7
  GO:0042379 chemokine receptor binding81.74×10−6
  GO:0005518 collagen binding85.25×10−6

B, Downregulated genes

TermCountP-value

GOTERM_BP_FAT
  GO:0050853 B cell receptor signaling pathway142.61×10−15
  GO:0042113 B cell activation181.10×10−11
  GO:0050851 antigen receptor-mediated signaling pathway165.08×10−10
GOTERM_CC_FAT
  GO:0019814 immunoglobulin complex76.34×10−8
  GO:0098552 side of membrane165.16×10−6
  GO:0042571 immunoglobulin complex, circulating53.76×10−5
GOTERM_MF_FAT
  GO:0034987 immunoglobulin receptor binding56.35×10−5
  GO:0003823 antigen binding73.36×10−4
  GO:0005070 SH3/SH2 adaptor activity58.38×10−4

GO, gene ontology; BP, biological process; CC, Cell Component; MF, molecular function.

The KEGG pathways enrichment of DEGs are presented in Table II. The upregulated DEGs were mainly enriched in transcriptional misregulation in cancer (P=6.64×10−6), Toll-like receptor signaling pathway (P=2.59×10−5), cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction (P=3.23×10−5), the downregulated DEGs were enriched in B cell receptor signaling pathway (P=1.90×10−6), Fc γ receptor-mediated phagocytosis (P=0.006327) and nuclear factor-κB signaling pathway (P=0.007157).
Table II.

Pathway enrichment analysis for DEGs (top three pathways with lower P-value).

A, Upregulated DEGs

KEGG-IDPathwayCountP-valueGenes
hsa05202Transcriptional misregulation in cancer136.64×10−6IL6, MMP9, GZMB, CD14, CCR7, CCND2, CDKN1A, ID2, IL1R2, ILRB, PLAU, MAF, CEBPB
hsa04620Toll-like receptor signaling pathway102.59×10−5IL6, STAT1, CCL3L3, CCL5, CXCL10, CXCL9, CD14, TLR8, CTSK, NFKBIA
hsa04060Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction143.23×10−5IL6, TNFRSF8, CCL3L3, IL2RB, CXCL10, CXCL13, TNFSF13B CXCL9, HGF, IL7R, IL2RA, CCR7, ILR2, CCL5,

B, Downregulated DEGs

KEGG-IDPathwayCountP-valueGenes

hsa04662B cell receptor signaling pathway81.90×10−6BLNK, PLCG2, PIK3CG, SYK, CD22, CR2 CD79B, RASGRP3
hsa04666Fc γ receptor-mediated phagocytosis50.006327PLCG2, SYK, PTPRC, PIK3CG, PRKCB
hsa04064Nuclear factor-κB signaling pathway50.007157BLNK, PLCG2, SYK, ATM, TRAF5

KEGG, Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.

PPI network and module analysis

The PPI network of DEGs was constructed (Fig. 3). There were 230 nodes and 694 interactions, the top 10 genes with the highest degrees in the PPI network were interleukin 6 (IL6; degree, 43), protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type C (PTPRC; degree, 34), signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1; degree, 34), matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9; degree, 30), spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK; degree, 27), C-C motif chemokine receptor 7 (degree, 25), fibronectin 1 (degree, 23), TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1 (degree, 22), integrin subunit β1 (degree, 21) and clusterin (degree, 19; Table III). These genes were selected as the hub nodes. Four modules were obtained from the PPI network of DEGs (Fig. 4). The significant GO-biological process terms and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis for co-expression modules genes is presented in Table IV.
Figure 3.

Protein-protein interaction network. The square nodes represent proteins and the grey lines represent interactions. The green color gradually changes to red as the degree increases and the depth of the red color is positively correlated with the degree of genes.

Table III.

Top 30 genes with high node degrees in protein-protein interaction network.

NodeDegreeLog2FCP-value
IL6436.1047941.70×10−16
PTPRC34−2.908515.81×10−8
STAT1343.3123682.32×10−11
MMP9306.1047941.70×10−16
SYK27−3.268621.42×10−13
CCR7253.4686334.71×10−9
FN1232.7248534.07×10−5
TIMP1223.7609191.10×10−13
ITGB121−2.515581.79×10−7
CLU193.6482656.08×10−10
FOXO119−2.752343.69×10−11
CD2173.815453.05×10−11
CD44172.7237061.01×10−5
CDKN1A172.6753015.78×10−11
IL2RB172.5083747.95×10−9
IL7R172.9923932.53×10−8
C3162.9598253.96×10−11
CTLA4162.5267536.14×10−8
GZMB163.1992131.98×10−6
ATF3153.3093776.60×10−9
CTSB154.854761.31×10−13
CXCL10154.9324542.34×10−9
CXCL13153.9130233.35×10−9
JAK115−2.717283.14×10−10
PIK3CG15−3.427791.20×10−8
PLCG214−3.009816.24×10−15
PRKCB14−3.147681.48×10−7
CCL5135.0478779.47×10−14
CD79B13−3.739221.95×10−13
CXCL9135.2935661.59×10−9

Negative log2FC values correspond to downregulated genes and positive log2FC values correspond to upregulated genes. FC, fold change.

Figure 4.

Co-expression modules of the DEGs. Red nodes represent upregulated genes and green nodes represent downregulated genes.

Table IV.

Significant GO-BP terms and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of genes in co-expression modules.

A, module 1

IDDescriptionCountP-valueGenes
GO:0034097Response to cytokine103.21×10−12IL6, STAT1, TNFAIP3, CCL18, NFKBIA, GBP2, CXCL9, GBP1, CXCL10, CD274
GO:0071345Cellular response to cytokine stimulus  91.88×10−10IL6, STAT1, CCL18, NFKBIA, GBP1, GBP2, CXCL9, CXCL10, TNFAIP3
GO:0006955Immune response101.43×10−9IL6, STAT1, TNFAIP, CCL18, NFKBIA, GBP2, CXCL9, GBP1, CXCL10, CD274
hsa04062Chemokine signaling pathway  51.65×10−5STAT1, CXCL9, CXCL10, GBP2, CCL18
hsa04668TNF signaling pathway  41.15×10−4IL6, CXCL10, TNFAIP3, GBP2

B, module 2

IDDescriptionCountP-valueGenes

GO:0042113B cell activation  51.55×10−6SYK, BLNK, PLCG2, BANK1, CR2
GO:0050853B cell receptor signaling pathway  41.86×10−6SYK, CD79B, PLCG2, BLK
GO:0002429Immune response-activating cell surface receptor signaling pathway  56.63×10−6SYK, BLK, PLCG2, CD79B, CR2
hsa04662B cell receptor signaling pathway  68.06×10−11SYK, BLNK, PLCG2, CD22, CD79B, CR2
hsa05169Epstein-Barr virus infection  30.007086SYK, PLCG2, CR2

C, module 3

IDDescriptionCountP-valueGenes

GO:0031667Response to nutrient levels  43.93×10−4SOCS3, ATF3, COL1A1, SPARC
hsa04668TNF signaling pathway  20.045025SOCS3, MMP9

D, module 4

IDDescriptionCountP-valueGenes

GO:0002521Leukocyte differentiation  53.27×10−6PTPRC, ITGB1, CD2, CD3D, TYROBP
GO:0030097Hemopoiesis  52.00×10−5PTPRC, ITGB1, CD2, CD3D, TYROBP
hsa04514Cell adhesion molecules  30.004048PTPRC, ITGB1, CD2,

GO-BP, gene ontology-biological process; KEGG, Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.

In module 1, all the DEGs were upregulated genes. STAT1 (degree, 7), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL) 9 (degree, 5), CXCL10 (degree, 4) and IL6 (degree, 4) had high degrees. The analysis of GO function and pathway enrichment for DEGs demonstrated that all DEGs in module 1 were most enriched in the GO terms response to cytokine (P=3.21×10−12) and the chemokine signaling pathway (P=1.65×10−5). All DEGs in module 2 were downregulated genes, and the enriched GO terms were B cell activation (P=1.55×10−6) and B cell receptor signaling pathway (P=1.86×10−6). The DEGs in module 2 were most enriched in the B cell receptor signaling pathway (P=8.06×10−11). Furthermore, in module 2, B-cell linker protein (BLNK) and phospholipase C γ2 (PLCG2) were the two genes which were listed in the top 10 of all downregulated genes. The DEGs with the high degree in module 2, were CD79B (degree, 7), PLCG2 (degree, 5) and SYK (degree, 5). In module 3, the most enriched KEGG pathway for the DEGs was the tumor necrosis factor signaling pathway (P=0.045025), which was associated with suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 and MMP9 genes. MMP9 was one of the most significant upregulated genes. In module 4, the most enriched GO term was leukocyte differentiation (P=3.27×10−6), and the enriched KEGG pathways included cell adhesion molecules and primary immunodeficiency. PTPRC had the highest degree (degree, 5) in module 4.

Discussion

cHL is a type of malignancy that originates from B cells. The pathogenic mechanisms of cHL remain unclear. In the present study, the molecular mechanisms of cHL were investigated using bioinformatics with aim to provide data that could lead to the development of useful therapeutics. A total of 450 DEGs were identified by comparing expression in cHL and normal B cells, among which 216 were upregulated and 234 were downregulated. The GO-BP that was most enriched among all DEGs was immune response. The immune response has a vital role in the pathogenesis of HL, and HRS cells apply various mechanisms to escape innate immune responses by secreting various factors and inducing an immunosuppressive phenotype in T cells and monocytes (18). The upregulated DEGs were predominantly enriched in the KEGG pathways, transcriptional misregulation in cancer, Toll-like receptor signaling and cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction. Downregulated DEGs were most enriched in the KEGG pathway B cell receptor signaling. B cell receptor signaling has been previously demonstrated to be a major driver of the pathological mechanisms of B-cell malignancies (19). The B cell receptor is a transmembrane protein located on the external surface of B cells and consists of heavy (IgH) and light (IgL) chains linked to a CD79A (Igα) and CD79B (Igβ) molecule (20). BLNK and SYK act as crucial downstream components to transduce B cell receptor signals (21). In the current study, SYK, BLNK, CD79B and PLCG2 were identified to be differentially expressed and enriched in the B cell receptor signaling pathway. SYK, BLNK and CD79B were downregulated the present study, which is in line with previously published data (22,23); however, an association between PLCG2 and cHL not been previously reported. Another report suggested that CD79B and BLNK downregulation in HRS cells was mediated by the effect of latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) (24); however, the production of LMP1 is caused by Epstein-Barr virus infection. SYK was identified as a hub gene in PPI network in the current study, BLNK was the most significantly downregulated genes, and CD79B and PLCG2 had the highest degrees in module 2. Thus, the downregulation of SYK, BLNK, CD79B and PLCG2 potential has a crucial role in the pathogenesis of cHL, through B cell receptor signaling pathway and Epstein-Barr virus infection. In cHL, defective transcription regulation can lead to a loss of immunoglobulin expression and B cell receptor downregulation, which facilitates evasion of apoptosis by HRS cells (24–26). IL6 and MMP9 were enriched in the transcriptional misregulation in cancer KEGG pathway, therefore we hypothesize that IL6 and MMP9 may have an important role in cHL pathogenesis. HRS cells can create a tumorigenic microenvironment by secreting certain cytokines and chemokines (27); IL6 is considered to be an important cytokines associated with the occurrence of HL (28) and may predict patient prognosis (29). Furthermore, IL6 participates in the pathway of cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction. Notably, the results of the current study indicated that CD30 (also termed TNF receptor superfamily member 8) is also involved in the same pathway. As it has been previously established that expression of CD30 is characteristic in cHL (30), there may be an interactive effect between IL6 and CD30. IL-6 had the highest degree of connectivity in PPI network. Taken together, this suggests that IL-6 participates in the pathogenesis of HL. The another molecule, MMP9, enriched in the transcriptional misregulation in cancer pathway and was a hub protein in the PPI network in the present study, and has also been previously reported to be associated with reduced overall survival in patients with cHL (31) through effects on immune system regulation (32). A previous study has suggested that the patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma and MMP9 expression had poor overall survival (33). Therefore, we hypothesize that MMP9 may be a key molecule involved in the development of classic Hodgkin lymphoma. STAT1 has interconnectivity with IL6 and CD274/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in the GO term of response to cytokine and immune response. It has been well documented that tumor cells expressing CD274/PD-L1 on their surface and using the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) pathway to evade antitumor immune response, so CD274/PD-L1 has been regarded as an independent prognostic factor for cHL (34–36). Furthermore, it was reported that PD-1 blockade with nivolumab has been successful for cHL treatment (37). module 1 in the current study suggests that STAT1 has a cross communication with CD274/PD-L1 and IL6 in pathogenesis of HL. Additionally, Butterbach et al (38) demonstrated that STAT1 was significantly associated with lymphoma risk (39), indicating that STAT1 may have a key role in pathogenesis of cHL. PTPRC is also known as CD45, which was a downregulated DEGs that represent the highest degree in module 4 in the current study. PTPRC/CD45− has become a cell marker criteria for the diagnosis of cHL (39,40), this is consistent with the findings of the current study and further confirmed the reliability the results. In conclusion, DEGs and pathways that may be involved in pathogenesis of cHL were identified by a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis in the present study. The findings may be useful for understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms of cHL. DEGS including IL6, STAT1, MMP9, SYK, BLNK, PLCG2 and CD79B, and the pathways of B cell receptor signaling, Epstein-Barr virus infection and transcriptional misregulation in cancer may potentially to be used as diagnostic and therapeutic targets in cHL. However, the present study had limited of sample size, which may give rise to a high false-positive rate. Additionally, this study lacked experimental verification, therefore, the findings require additional genetic and experimental studies to validate the results.
  39 in total

1.  KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M Kanehisa; S Goto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Simpleaffy: a BioConductor package for Affymetrix Quality Control and data analysis.

Authors:  Claire L Wilson; Crispin J Miller
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) expression in Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Semra Paydas; Emine Bağır; Gulsah Seydaoglu; Vehbi Ercolak; Melek Ergin
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.673

4.  Association of JAK-STAT pathway related genes with lymphoma risk: results of a European case-control study (EpiLymph).

Authors:  Katja Butterbach; Lars Beckmann; Silvia de Sanjosé; Yolanda Benavente; Nikolaus Becker; Lenka Foretova; Marc Maynadie; Pierluigi Cocco; Anthony Staines; Paolo Boffetta; Paul Brennan; Alexandra Nieters
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 5.  B-cell receptor signaling in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Ryan M Young; Arthur L Shaffer; James D Phelan; Louis M Staudt
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.851

Review 6.  Dynamics of B cells in germinal centres.

Authors:  Nilushi S De Silva; Ulf Klein
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 53.106

7.  Expression of intracellular signaling molecules in classical and lymphocyte predominance Hodgkin disease.

Authors:  Teresa Marafioti; Michela Pozzobon; Martin-Leo Hansmann; Georges Delsol; Stefano A Pileri; David Y Mason
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Targeting CD30 Using Brentuximab Vedotin in the Treatment of Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Anna Alperovich; Anas Younes
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

9.  Analyzing primary Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells to capture the molecular and cellular pathogenesis of classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Enrico Tiacci; Claudia Döring; Verena Brune; Carel J M van Noesel; Wolfram Klapper; Gunhild Mechtersheimer; Brunangelo Falini; Ralf Küppers; Martin-Leo Hansmann
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression by Hodgkin-Reed-Sternberg cells is associated with reduced overall survival in young adult patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Antonio Hugo Campos; Jose Vassallo; Fernando Augusto Soares
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Structure and function of B-cell linker and its role in the development of B cell-related diseases].

Authors:  Bin Xiao; Jiaying Li; Mengsi Zhou; Xiaoqing Li; Xiaoyan Huang; Jianfeng Hang; Zhaohui Sun; Linhai Li
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-02-28

2.  Genomic crossroads between non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and common variable immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Kissy Guevara-Hoyer; Jesús Fuentes-Antrás; Eduardo de la Fuente-Muñoz; Miguel Fernández-Arquero; Fernando Solano; Pedro Pérez-Segura; Esmeralda Neves; Alberto Ocaña; Rebeca Pérez de Diego; Silvia Sánchez-Ramón
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 8.786

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.