| Literature DB >> 35990641 |
Kissy Guevara-Hoyer1,2,3, Jesús Fuentes-Antrás4,5, Eduardo de la Fuente-Muñoz1,2,3, Miguel Fernández-Arquero1,2,3, Fernando Solano6, Pedro Pérez-Segura4, Esmeralda Neves7,8, Alberto Ocaña4,5, Rebeca Pérez de Diego3,9, Silvia Sánchez-Ramón1,2,3.
Abstract
Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) represents the largest group of primary immunodeficiencies that may manifest with infections, inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer, mainly B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Indeed, NHL may result from chronic or recurrent infections and has, therefore, been recognized as a clinical phenotype of CVID, although rare. The more one delves into the mechanisms involved in CVID and cancer, the stronger the idea that both pathologies can be a reflection of the same primer events observed from different angles. The potential effects of germline variants on specific somatic modifications in malignancies suggest that it might be possible to anticipate critical events during tumor development. In the same way, a somatic alteration in NHL could be conditioning a similar response at the transcriptional level in the shared signaling pathways with genetic germline alterations in CVID. We aimed to explore the genomic substrate shared between these entities to better characterize the CVID phenotype immunodeficiency in NHL. By means of an in-silico approach, we interrogated the large, publicly available datasets contained in cBioPortal for the presence of genes associated with genetic pathogenic variants in a panel of 50 genes recurrently altered in CVID and previously described as causative or disease-modifying. We found that 323 (25%) of the 1,309 NHL samples available for analysis harbored variants of the CVID spectrum, with the most recurrent alteration presented in NHL occurring in PIK3CD (6%) and STAT3 (4%). Pathway analysis of common gene alterations showed enrichment in inflammatory, immune surveillance, and defective DNA repair mechanisms similar to those affected in CVID, with PIK3R1 appearing as a central node in the protein interaction network. The co-occurrence of gene alterations was a frequent phenomenon. This study represents an attempt to identify common genomic grounds between CVID and NHL. Further prospective studies are required to better know the role of genetic variants associated with CVID and their reflection on the somatic pathogenic variants responsible for cancer, as well as to characterize the CVID-like phenotype in NHL, with the potential to influence early CVID detection and therapeutic management.Entities:
Keywords: CVID; genomic; in silico; malignancy; non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35990641 PMCID: PMC9390007 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.937872
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
NHL datasets available in cBioPortal (www.cbioportal.org; accessed in September 2021).
| NHL-associated studies | Reference | CVID genes altered per study |
|---|---|---|
| Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma | DFCI, Nat Med 2018 ( | 32.85% (44/135 cases) |
| Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma | Broad, PNAS 2012 ( | 29.31% (17/58 cases) |
| Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma | Duke, Cell 2017 ( | 21.38% (214/1001 cases) |
| Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma | TCGA, PanCancer Atlas 2018 ( | 62.5% (30/48 cases) |
| Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma | BCGSC, Blood 2013 ( | 26.42% (14/53 cases) |
| Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma | BCGSC, Nature 2011 ( | 28.57% (4/14 cases) |
Main CVID-associated genes and their alteration in the NHL datasets.
| Gene | Prevalence (%) of samples studied (somatic mutation) | No. of samples altered | No. of patients w/ exclusive mutation | No. of patients w/ ≥ 2 associated mutations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 6 | 72 | 49 | 23 |
|
| 5 | 64 | 45 | 19 |
|
| 4 | 57 | 32 | 25 |
|
| 3 | 40 | 31 | 9 |
|
| 2.4 | 31 | 18 | 13 |
|
| 1.8 | 24 | 22 | 2 |
|
| 1.3 | 17 | 10 | 7 |
|
| 0.9 | 12 | 6 | 6 |
|
| 0.8 | 10 | 7 | 3 |
|
| 0.5 | 7 | 2 | 5 |
|
| 0.5 | 6 | 1 | 5 |
|
| 0.5 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
|
| 0.5 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
|
| 0.5 | 6 | 1 | 5 |
|
| 0.4 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
|
| 0.4 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
|
| 0.3 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
|
| 0.3 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
|
| 0.3 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
|
| 0.2 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
|
| 0.2 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
|
| 0.2 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
|
| 0.2 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
|
| 0.2 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
|
| 0.2 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
|
| 0.2 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
|
| 0.2 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
|
| 0.2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
|
| 0.2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 0.2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
|
| 0.2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 0.2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 0.2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 0.2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
|
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 0.1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 0.1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
|
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
The percentage, number of altered samples (≥1), and number of patients/mutations are shown.
Frequencies of the main CVID-associated gene alterations in the NHL and CVID populations.
| Gene symbol | Prevalence of the samples studied (somatic mutation) | CVID prevalence (germline mutation) | Gene symbol | Prevalence of the samples studied (somatic mutation) | CVID prevalence (germline mutation) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIK3CD | 6 | 2.674 | NOD2 | 0.2 | Unknown prevalence |
| KMT2C | 5 | Unknown prevalence | PMS2 | 0.2 | Unknown prevalence |
| STAT3 | 4 | Unknown prevalence | TNFRSF13C | 0.2 | 0.10 |
| MSH2 | 3 | Unknown prevalence | SH3KBP1 | 0.2 | Unknown prevalence |
| NFKB2 | 2.4 | 0.535 | ARHGEF1 | 0.2 | Unknown prevalence |
| PTEN | 1.8 | Unknown prevalence | CD84 | 0.2 | Unknown prevalence |
| PIK3R1 | 1.3 | 0.481 | IL10RA | 0.2 | Unknown prevalence |
| LRBA | 0.9 | 2.674 | MS4A1 | 0.2 | 0.053 |
| MSH5 | 0.8 | 0.4 | NFKB1 | 0.2 | 0.16 |
| CLEC16A | 0.5 | Unknown prevalence | TNFRSF11A | 0.2 | Unknown prevalence |
| PLCG2 | 0.5 | 0.214 | TNFSF11 | 0.2 | Unknown prevalence |
| IRF2BP2 | 0.5 | 0.053 | MOGS | 0.2 | Unknown prevalence |
| RAC2 | 0.5 | 0.053 | ACOT4 | 0.1 | Unknown prevalence |
| ATP6AP1 | 0.5 | Unknown prevalence | CTLA4 | 0.1 | 0.642 |
| CR2 | 0.4 | 0.107 | FCGR2A | 0.1 | Unknown prevalence |
| TNFRSF4 | 0.4 | Unknown prevalence | OR10X1 | 0.1 | Unknown prevalence |
| DOCK8 | 0.3 | Unknown prevalence | SLC25A5 | 0.1 | Unknown prevalence |
| PRKCD | 0.3 | 0.214 | STXBP2 | 0.1 | Unknown prevalence |
| TNFRSF1A | 0.3 | Unknown prevalence | TRNT1 | 0.1 | Unknown prevalence |
| CD19 | 0.2 | 0.374 | TNFRSF13B | 0.1 | 0.07 |
| IKZF1 | 0.2 | 0.321 | TNFSF13 | 0.1 | Unknown prevalence |
| VAV1 | 0.2 | 0.053 | TNFSF12 | 0.1 | 0.053 |
Figure 1Protein–protein interaction map displaying the significant functional network integrated by the selected genes involved in NHL and CVID. Known interactions are displayed in blue and pink lines. Predictive interactions include the following: green line, gene neighborhood; red line, gene fusions; blue line, gene co-occurrence; yellow line, text mining; black line, co-expression; and gray line, protein homology. Connections are filtered by the highest confidence (0.7). PPI enrichment p-value: < 1.0e−16.
Relationships organized in biological pathways and processes mainly related to CVID-associated genes expressed in NHL (sorted by p-value; p < 0.05).
| Associated pathways of CVID genes | Related genes |
|---|---|
| Antigen activates B-cell receptor (BCR) leading to the generation of second messengers |
|
| Role of phospholipids in phagocytosis |
|
| PKMTs methylate histone lysine |
|
| Dex/H-box helicases activate type I IFN and inflammatory cytokine production |
|
| RIP-mediated NF-κB activation |
|
| TAK1 activates NF-κB by phosphorylation and activation of the IKK complex |
|
| TRAF6 mediated NF-κB activation |
|
| Mismatch repair (MMR) directed by MSH2:MSH3 (Mutsbeta) |
|
| Interleukin receptor SHC signaling |
|
| TP53 regulates the transcription of DNA repair genes |
|
| Interleukin-1 processing |
|
| Interleukin-10 signaling |
|
| IkBA variant leads to EDA-ID |
|
| TNF receptor superfamily (TNFSF) members mediating the non-canonical NF-κB pathway |
|
| TNFs bind their physiological receptors |
|
| TNFR2 non-canonical NF-κB pathway |
|
Co-occurrence of mutations in the analyzed population calculated by the odds ratio method in cBioPortal.
| Gene A | Gene B | Neither | A not B | B not A | Both | Log2 odds ratio |
|
| Tendency | Associations with proteins encoded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 1,297 | 2 | 1 | 2 | >3 | <0.001 | 0.013 | Co-occurrence | Independent roles |
|
|
| 1,296 | 3 | 1 | 2 | >3 | <0.001 | 0.013 | Co-occurrence | Independent roles |
|
|
| 1,278 | 2 | 19 | 3 | >3 | <0.001 | 0.013 | Co-occurrence | Independent roles |
|
|
| 1,295 | 1 | 4 | 2 | >3 | <0.001 | 0.013 | Co-occurrence | Independent roles |
|
|
| 1,295 | 4 | 1 | 2 | >3 | <0.001 | 0.013 | Co-occurrence | Independent roles |
|
|
| 1,295 | 3 | 2 | 2 | >3 | <0.001 | 0.014 | Co-occurrence | Independent roles |
|
|
| 1,294 | 2 | 4 | 2 | >3 | <0.001 | 0.017 | Co-occurrence | Shared roles |
|
|
| 1,291 | 8 | 1 | 2 | >3 | <0.001 | 0.020 | Co-occurrence | Shared roles |
|
|
| 1,293 | 3 | 4 | 2 | >3 | <0.001 | 0.020 | Co-occurrence | Shared roles |
|
|
| 1,289 | 10 | 1 | 2 | >3 | <0.001 | 0.028 | Co-occurrence | Independent roles |
|
|
| 1,290 | 2 | 8 | 2 | >3 | <0.001 | 0.031 | Co-occurrence | Independent roles |
|
|
| 1,289 | 3 | 8 | 2 | >3 | <0.001 | 0.044 | Co-occurrence | Independent roles |
|
|
| 1,301 | 0 | 0 | 1 | >3 | <0.001 | 0.044 | Co-occurrence | Independent roles |
|
|
| 1,301 | 0 | 0 | 1 | >3 | <0.001 | 0.044 | Co-occurrence | Shared roles |
|
|
| 1,301 | 0 | 0 | 1 | >3 | <0.001 | 0.044 | Co-occurrence | Shared roles |
|
|
| 1,301 | 0 | 0 | 1 | >3 | <0.001 | 0.044 | Co-occurrence | Shared roles |