| Literature DB >> 28790981 |
Elena Herrmann1, Wayne Young2, Douglas Rosendale3, Ralf Conrad4, Christian U Riedel5, Markus Egert1.
Abstract
The impact of the intestinal microbiota on human health is becoming increasingly appreciated in recent years. In consequence, and fueled by major technological advances, the composition of the intestinal microbiota in health and disease has been intensively studied by high throughput sequencing approaches. Observations linking dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota with a number of serious medical conditions including chronic inflammatory disorders and allergic diseases suggest that restoration of the composition and activity of the intestinal microbiota may be a treatment option at least for some of these diseases. One possibility to shape the intestinal microbiota is the administration of prebiotic carbohydrates such as resistant starch (RS). In the present study, we aim at establishing RNA-based stable isotope probing (RNA-SIP) to identify bacterial populations that are involved in the assimilation of RS using anaerobic in vitro fermentation of murine fecal material with stable [U13C] isotope-labeled potato starch. Total RNA from these incubations was extracted, processed by gradient ultracentrifugation and fractionated by density. 16S rRNA gene sequences were amplified from reverse transcribed RNA of high and low density fractions suspected to contain labeled and unlabeled RNA, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis of the obtained sequences revealed a distinct subset of the intestinal microbiota involved in starch metabolism. The results suggest Bacteroidetes, in particular genera affiliated with Prevotellaceae, as well as members of the Ruminococcacea family to be primary assimilators of resistant starch due to a significantly higher relative abundance in higher density fractions in RNA samples isolated after 2 h of incubation. Using high performance liquid chromatography coupled to isotope ratio mass spectrometry (HPLC-IRMS) analysis, some stable isotope label was recovered from acetate, propionate and butyrate. Here, we demonstrate the suitability of RNA-SIP to link specific groups of microorganisms with fermentation of a specific substrate. The application of RNA-SIP in future in vivo studies will help to better understand the mechanisms behind functionality of a prebiotic carbohydrate and its impact on an intestinal ecosystem with potential implications for human health.Entities:
Keywords: Bacteroidetes; HPLC-IRMS; Prevotellaceae; RNA-SIP; Ruminococcaceae; gut microbiota; resistant starch
Year: 2017 PMID: 28790981 PMCID: PMC5522855 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Buoyant density (BD) curves from isopycnic density gradients (A). Values represent mean and standard error (SEM) of 10 gradients. For each fraction, SEM was ≤0.02 g mL−1, error bars for fraction 1–15 are smaller than the symbols. (B–D) Relative amount of RNA in selected gradient fractions. RNA was isolated from fresh fecal slurry (0 h; B), and from slurries incubated with either [12C]starch or [13C]starch for 2 h (C) or 4 h (D). Values represent mean of duplicate incubations per gradient fraction. To facilitate comparison between different gradients, RNA content in each fraction was expressed as proportion (%) of the total amount of RNA found in the fraction containing the highest RNA concentration (Herrmann et al., 2017b). “Heavy” and “light” RNA from the fractions highlighted by symbols were selected for further analysis of microbiota composition by NGS.
Relative abundances of bacterial taxa represented by 16S rRNA gene amplicons in “light” RNA-SIP fractions obtained from fresh fecal slurry material (0 h) or after incubation with [12C]starch for 2 and 4 h.
| Firmicutes | 95.68 | 0.45 | 90.89 | 0.73 | 87.18 | 0.58 | 0.003 | 0.020 |
| 92.30 | 1.27 | 85.79 | 2.05 | 80.61 | 0.90 | 0.011 | 0.027 | |
| 2.51 | 0.61 | 3.69 | 1.10 | 4.80 | 0.44 | 0.205 | 0.236 | |
| Bacteroidetes | 2.66 | 0.32 | 6.11 | 0.51 | 9.49 | 0.50 | 0.005 | 0.020 |
| 2.62 | 0.32 | 6.04 | 0.51 | 9.40 | 0.50 | 0.001 | 0.015 | |
| Proteobacteria | 0.78 | 0.10 | 1.54 | 0.16 | 1.53 | 0.15 | 0.036 | 0.064 |
| Uc. Bacteria | 0.40 | 0.08 | 0.72 | 0.18 | 0.74 | 0.25 | 0.432 | 0.432 |
| Verrucomicrobia | 0.29 | 0.04 | 0.43 | 0.06 | 0.58 | 0.06 | 0.034 | 0.064 |
| Actinobacteria | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.05 | 0.056 | 0.064 |
| Tenericutes | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.043 | 0.064 |
| Deferribacteres | 0.02 | 0 | 0.04 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.049 | 0.064 |
| TM7 | n. d | 0 | n. d | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | – | – |
Values represent mean (n = 3 fractions) and standard error of the mean (SEM). P-value indicates permutation ANOVA significance with time as factor. False Discovery Rate (FDR) indicates multiple testing adjusted P-value. Uc., Unclassified; n.d., not detected.
Figure 2Stacked barplots showing the average bacterial microbiota composition represented by 16S rRNA gene amplicons in different density SIP fractions. RNA was isolated from fresh fecal content (0 h) or after 2 and 4 h of incubation in the presence of unlabeled [12C]starch (A) or isotope-labeled [U13C]starch (B). The 40 taxa with highest mean relative abundance across all samples are shown. (C) Faith's phylogenetic diversity estimate in “heavy” and “light” RNA fractions of the [U13C]starch fed communities after 2 and 4 h of incubation. *Indicates significance in complexity at p < 0.01 as calculated by two-factor ANOVA with time and density as factors.
Figure 3Heatmaps showing hierarchical clustering of bacterial community composition profiles of the 40 most abundant taxa represented by 16S rRNA gene amplicons per analyzed sample of the “heavy” and “light” SIP fractions. RNA was isolated from fecal slurries following incubation with [U13C]starch after 2 h or 4 h. Heatmap color (blue to dark red) displays the row scaled relative abundance of each taxon across all samples. The number in parentheses indicates the corresponding fraction number. Letters in parentheses preceding taxonomic labels indicate the phylum (Ac, Actinobacteria; Ba, Bacteroidetes; De, Deferribacteres; Fi, Firmicutes; Pr, Proteobacteria; Ve, Verrucomicrobia; Un, Unclassified). Symbols behind taxonomic labels indicate significant higher relative abundance at FDR ≤ 0.05 of taxa in “heavy” fractions compared with “light” fractions after 2 h (⋆) or 4 h (•).
Prevalence of bacterial taxa represented by 16S rRNA gene amplicons in “light” and “heavy” RNA-SIP fractions obtained from incubations with [13C]starch for 2 and 4 h.
| Firmicutes | 88.03 | 0.50 | 90.68 | 1.20 | 86.43 | 0.85 | 92.82 | 0.77 | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.789 | 0.789 | 0.072 |
| Uc. | 50.10 | 0.72 | 53.30 | 1.97 | 44.18 | 0.96 | 51.44 | 2.29 | 0.013 | 0.021 | 0.055 | 0.169 | 0.249 |
| Uc. | 11.40 | 0.65 | 8.14 | 0.92 | 14.91 | 0.18 | 9.68 | 0.38 | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.007 | 0.035 | 0.131 |
| Uc. | 9.99 | 0.83 | 13.02 | 1.20 | 8.99 | 0.41 | 13.15 | 0.23 | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.588 | 0.790 | 0.529 |
| 2.33 | 0.36 | 1.26 | 0.16 | 2.49 | 0.12 | 1.37 | 0.04 | 0.003 | 0.007 | 0.508 | 0.753 | 0.892 | |
| 2.27 | 0.14 | 1.27 | 0.15 | 2.39 | 0.07 | 1.19 | 0.01 | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.770 | 0.894 | 0.397 | |
| 0.90 | 0.10 | 0.68 | 0.12 | 1.34 | 0.02 | 0.93 | 0.19 | 0.037 | 0.051 | 0.030 | 0.109 | 0.443 | |
| 0.57 | 0.03 | 0.55 | 0.05 | 0.88 | 0.05 | 0.57 | 0.04 | 0.006 | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.053 | 0.022 | |
| 0.53 | 0.10 | 0 | 0 | 0.72 | 0.18 | 0 | 0 | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.365 | 0.583 | 0.365 | |
| Uc. | 0.25 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.38 | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.01 | 0.035 | 0.050 | 0.002 | 0.020 | 0.020 |
| Uc. | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 1.19 | 0.22 | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.782 | 0.894 | 0.197 |
| Bacteroidetes | 9.04 | 0.39 | 6.58 | 1.00 | 10.24 | 0.71 | 4.80 | 0.57 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.660 | 0.734 | 0.066 |
| Uc. | 4.31 | 0.17 | 3.69 | 0.61 | 5.27 | 0.27 | 2.75 | 0.39 | 0.007 | 0.014 | 0.980 | 0.980 | 0.044 |
| 1.76 | 0.09 | 0.87 | 0.21 | 1.85 | 0.18 | 0.61 | 0.07 | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.552 | 0.789 | 0.278 | |
| 1.08 | 0.07 | 0.91 | 0.12 | 1.14 | 0.06 | 0.63 | 0.11 | 0.008 | 0.015 | 0.265 | 0.529 | 0.100 | |
| 0.61 | 0.06 | 0.37 | 0.03 | 0.72 | 0.07 | 0.28 | 0.02 | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.835 | 0.903 | 0.082 | |
| Uc. | 0.60 | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 0.56 | 0.07 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.309 | 0.552 | 0.701 |
| Proteobacteria | 1.57 | 0.15 | 1.25 | 0.27 | 2.14 | 0.12 | 1.23 | 0.13 | 0.014 | 0.017 | 0.154 | 0.256 | 0.130 |
| 0.71 | 0.06 | 0.55 | 0.14 | 0.79 | 0.03 | 0.41 | 0.04 | 0.016 | 0.025 | 0.631 | 0.809 | 0.197 | |
| Uc. | 0.34 | 0.03 | 0.34 | 0.05 | 0.72 | 0.03 | 0.50 | 0.05 | 0.040 | 0.053 | 0.001 | 0.013 | 0.038 |
| Other | |||||||||||||
| Uc. | 0.50 | 0.10 | 0.88 | 0.12 | 0.26 | 0.05 | 0.67 | 0.10 | 0.006 | 0.013 | 0.044 | 0.147 | 0.863 |
Values represent mean (n = 3 fractions) and standard error of the mean (SEM). Presented are taxa that show significant differences in mean relative abundances between the “heavy” and “light” gradient fractions of the .
Time profiles of concentration and relative 13C-enrichment of metabolites in fresh fecal slurry (0 h, t0) and 2 (t2) and 4 h (t4) after addition of either [12C]starch or [U13C]starch at a concentration equivalent to 40 mM of glucose.
| Lactate | 0.61 ± 0.18 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Acetate | 11.89 ± 0.11 | 10.34 ± 0.48 | 11.04 ± 0.19 | 0.95 ± 0.03 | 10.67 ± 0.54 | 11.69 ± 0.01 | 2.00 ± 0.04 |
| Propionate | 1.97 ± 0.11 | 2.88 ± 0.16 | 4.20 ± 0.08 | 1.46 ± 0.05 | 2.90 ± 0.97 | 3.66 ± 1.82 | 2.75 ± 0.03 |
| Butyrate | 0.81 ± 0.14 | 0.94 ± 0.01 | 1.69 ± 0.50 | 0.39 ± 0.20 | 1.40 ± 0.70 | 1.09 ± 0.03 | 1.11 ± 0.00 |
| Isobutyrate | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.00 | 0.12 ± 0.00 | 0.66 ± 0.00 | 0.13 ± 0.00 | – | – |
The enrichment with .