Literature DB >> 27053239

Analysis of factors contributing to variation in the C57BL/6J fecal microbiota across German animal facilities.

Philipp Rausch1, Marijana Basic2, Arvind Batra3, Stephan C Bischoff4, Michael Blaut5, Thomas Clavel6, Joachim Gläsner7, Shreya Gopalakrishnan8, Guntram A Grassl9, Claudia Günther10, Dirk Haller11, Misa Hirose12, Saleh Ibrahim12, Gunnar Loh5, Jochen Mattner13, Stefan Nagel14, Oliver Pabst15, Franziska Schmidt3, Britta Siegmund3, Till Strowig16, Valentina Volynets4, Stefan Wirtz10, Sebastian Zeissig17, Yvonne Zeissig18, André Bleich2, John F Baines19.   

Abstract

The intestinal microbiota is involved in many physiological processes and it is increasingly recognized that differences in community composition can influence the outcome of a variety of murine models used in biomedical research. In an effort to describe and account for the variation in intestinal microbiota composition across the animal facilities of participating members of the DFG Priority Program 1656 "Intestinal Microbiota", we performed a survey of C57BL/6J mice from 21 different mouse rooms/facilities located at 13 different institutions across Germany. Fresh feces was sampled from five mice per room/facility using standardized procedures, followed by extraction and 16S rRNA gene profiling (V1-V2 region, Illumina MiSeq) at both the DNA and RNA (reverse transcribed to cDNA) level. In order to determine the variables contributing to bacterial community differences, we collected detailed questionnaires of animal husbandry practices and incorporated this information into our analyses. We identified considerable variation in a number of descriptive aspects including the proportions of major phyla, alpha- and beta diversity, all of which displayed significant associations to specific aspects of husbandry. Salient findings include a reduction in alpha diversity with the use of irradiated chow, an increase in inter-individual variability (beta diversity) with respect to barrier access and open cages and an increase in bacterial community divergence with time since importing from a vendor. We further observe a high degree of facility-level individuality, which is likely due to each facility harboring its own unique combination of multiple varying attributes of animal husbandry. While it is important to account and control for such differences between facilities, the documentation of such diversity may also serve as a valuable future resource for investigating the origins of microbial-driven host phenotypes.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA gene; C57BL/6J; Gut microbiota; Mouse husbandry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27053239     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2016.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 1438-4221            Impact factor:   3.473


  63 in total

Review 1.  Dysbiosis and the immune system.

Authors:  Maayan Levy; Aleksandra A Kolodziejczyk; Christoph A Thaiss; Eran Elinav
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 53.106

2.  Targeted loss of SHP1 in murine thymocytes dampens TCR signaling late in selection.

Authors:  Ryan J Martinez; Anna B Morris; Dennis K Neeld; Brian D Evavold
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 3.  The NLRP6 inflammasome in health and disease.

Authors:  Laxman Ghimire; Sagar Paudel; Liliang Jin; Samithamby Jeyaseelan
Journal:  Mucosal Immunol       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 7.313

Review 4.  Gut Microbiome and Bone: to Build, Destroy, or Both?

Authors:  Jing Yan; Julia F Charles
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  CCL28 Is Involved in Mucosal IgA Responses, Olfaction, and Resistance to Enteric Infections.

Authors:  Amanda M Burkhardt; Araceli Perez-Lopez; Irina Ushach; Jovani Catalan-Dibene; Sean-Paul Nuccio; Lawton K Chung; Marcela Hernandez-Ruiz; Christina Carnevale; Manuela Raffatellu; Albert Zlotnik
Journal:  J Interferon Cytokine Res       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.607

6.  Murine Genetic Background Has a Stronger Impact on the Composition of the Gut Microbiota than Maternal Inoculation or Exposure to Unlike Exogenous Microbiota.

Authors:  Hila Korach-Rechtman; Shay Freilich; Shiran Gerassy-Vainberg; Keren Buhnik-Rosenblau; Yael Danin-Poleg; Haim Bar; Yechezkel Kashi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  PCR and RT-PCR in the Diagnosis of Laboratory Animal Infections and in Health Monitoring.

Authors:  Susan R Compton
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 8.  Interactions between noroviruses, the host, and the microbiota.

Authors:  Forrest C Walker; Megan T Baldridge
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 7.090

Review 9.  Deciphering interactions between the gut microbiota and the immune system via microbial cultivation and minimal microbiomes.

Authors:  Thomas Clavel; João Carlos Gomes-Neto; Ilias Lagkouvardos; Amanda E Ramer-Tait
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 10.  Intersection of the Gut Microbiome and Circadian Rhythms in Metabolism.

Authors:  Katya Frazier; Eugene B Chang
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 12.015

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.