| Literature DB >> 28787835 |
George S Pappas1, Stefania Ferrari2, Xiaobin Huang3, Rohit Bhagat4, David M Haddleton5, Chaoying Wan6.
Abstract
Long cycle performance is a crucial requirement in energy storage devices. New formulations and/or improvement of "conventional" materials have been investigated in order to achieve this target. Here we explore the performance of a novel type of class="Chemical">carbon class="Chemical">naclass="Chemical">nospheres (CNSs) with three heteroatom co-Entities:
Keywords: carbon nanospheres; lithium batteries; organo phosphazene
Year: 2016 PMID: 28787835 PMCID: PMC5456559 DOI: 10.3390/ma9010035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a) SEM image of the organo (phosphazene) (OPZ) nanospheres (×50k magnification); (b) electron dispersive spectroscopy analysis (EDS) spectra of the OPZ nanospheres; (c) SEM image of the carbon nanospheres (CNSs) after carbonization at 850 °C (×100k magnification); (d) EDS spectra of the CNSs.
Figure 2(a) Raman spectra of the OPZ and the CNSs; and (b) XRD pattern of the CNSs.
Figure 3(a) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms; and (b) pore size distribution of the OPZs and CNSs.
Figure 4XPS of the CNSs sample: (a) survey spectrum and fitted high resolution spectra of; (b) C 1s; (c) N 1s; (d) P 2p; (e) S 2p; and (f) O 1s.
Atomic percentage, peak position and width obtained by fitting the high resolution XPS spectra.
| Element | at % | Peak Position (eV) | Width (eV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| C 1 | 67.0 | (I) 284.3 | 1.2 |
| (II) 289.8 | 2.8 | ||
| O 1 | 19.6 | (I) 532.4 | 2.0 |
| (II) 530.5 | 1.4 | ||
| (III) 535.7 | 1.9 | ||
| (IV) 537.9 | 1.9 | ||
| P 2 | 8.0 | (3/2) 132.8 | 1.8 |
| (1/2) 133.6 | 1.8 | ||
| N 1 | 4.7 | (I) 397.6 | 1.6 |
| (II) 399.6 | 1.6 | ||
| (III) 401.2 | 1.6 | ||
| S 2 | 0.7 | (3/2) 163.4 | 0.9 |
| (1/2) 164.6 | 0.9 |
Figure 5Cyclic voltammetry (CV) test of the CNSs. The graph shows some selected cycles between 5 mV and 3 V at a scan rate of 0.1 mV·s−1.
Figure 6(a) Capacity vs. cycle number at C/20 (3 cycles), C/10 and C/5 (5 cycles each) and 1C current rate (25 cycles); (b) charge and discharge voltage profile of the first and second cycles at C/20; and (c) capacity vs. cycle number at C/5 current for 100 cycles.
Figure 7Capacity vs. cycle number at: (a) 1C rate for 1100 cycles; and (b) at 1C, 2C and 5C current rate for 50 cycles each.