Literature DB >> 28787471

Influence of Scan Resolution, Thresholding, and Reconstruction Algorithm on Computed Tomography-Based Kinematic Measurements.

Christopher John Tan1,2, William C H Parr1, William R Walsh1, Mariano Makara3, Kenneth A Johnson3.   

Abstract

Radiographic data, including computed tomography (CT) and planar X-ray, is increasingly used for human and animal kinematic studies. There is a tendency toward using as high-resolution imaging as possible. Higher resolution imaging is one factor (in conjunction with the reconstruction algorithm), which may increase the precision of reconstructed three-dimensional (3D) surface models in representing true bone shape. However, to date no study has tested the effects of scan resolution, threshold, and 3D model reconstruction algorithm on the accuracy of bone kinematic results. The present study uses a novel method to do this where canine tarsal bones were positioned on a radiolucent Lego™ board and scanned before and after undergoing known translations and/or rotations. The digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) images were acquired using two different CT scanning resolutions and processed using three different segmentation threshold levels and three different reconstruction algorithms. Using one bone as the reference bone, an iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm was used to register bones to a global co-ordinate system and allow measurement of other bone kinematics in terms of translations and rotations in and around the x-, y-, and z-axes. The measured kinematics were compared to the "known" kinematics, which were obtained from the Lego™ board's manufacturing standards and tolerances, to give accuracy error metrics for all bones. The results showed error in accuracy of measured kinematics was at subvoxel levels (less than 0.5 mm). Despite altering the volume and surface area of the 3D bone models, variation in resolution, segmentation threshold and reconstruction algorithm had no significant influence upon the accuracy of the calculated tarsal bone kinematics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28787471     DOI: 10.1115/1.4037558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  6 in total

Review 1.  3-dimensional printing for anterior cervical surgery: a review.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; William C H Parr; Kevin Phan; William R Walsh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

Review 2.  3D printed anatomical (bio)models in spine surgery: clinical benefits and value to health care providers.

Authors:  William C H Parr; Joshua L Burnard; Peter John Wilson; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

3.  Quantification of Head Shape and Cranioplasty Outcomes: Six-compartment Volume Method Applied to Sagittal Synostosis.

Authors:  William X Z Liaw; William C H Parr; Tim S Peltz; Alex Varey; Jeremy Hunt; Mark Gianoutsos; Damian D Marucci; William Walsh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-04-02

4.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the canine carpal bones imaged with computed tomography after ex vivo axial limb loading and palmar ligament transection.

Authors:  Jack D Neville-Towle; Christopher J Tan; William C H Parr; William R Walsh; Kenneth A Johnson
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 1.495

5.  Effect of Bicortical Interfragmentary Screw Size on the Fixation of Metacarpal Shaft Fractures: A 3-Dimensional-Printed Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Matthew J White; William C H Parr; T Wang; Bernard F Schick; William R Walsh
Journal:  J Hand Surg Glob Online       Date:  2021-03-03

6.  Rapid Personalised Virtual Planning and On-Demand Surgery for Acute Spinal Trauma Using 3D-Printing, Biomodelling and Patient-Specific Implant Manufacture.

Authors:  Ralph Jasper Mobbs; William C H Parr; Christopher Huang; Tajrian Amin
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.