Literature DB >> 28786025

Clinical effects of 3-D printing-assisted personalized reconstructive surgery for blowout orbital fractures.

Bin Fan1, Han Chen1, Ying-Jian Sun1, Bei-Fen Wang1, Lin Che1, Shu-Yan Liu1, Guang-Yu Li2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: One of the key challenges during orbital fracture reconstructive surgery, due to the complex anatomy of the orbit, is shaping and trimming the precise contour of the implants. The objectives of this study were to describe and evaluate the use of a three-dimensional (3-D) printing technique for personalized reconstructive surgery for repairing orbital fractures.
METHODS: A total of 29 cases which had 3-D technique-assisted surgical reconstruction, and 27 cases which had traditional surgery, were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative CT images were measured using MIMICS software, and the contour of the fracture zone and the Medpor-titanium implant were analyzed and compared. The surgical duration was also compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in the maximum width, depth and area between fracture zone and implant between the two groups, with the absolute value in the 3-D group markedly lower as compared to the control group. In addition, the difference in the medial-inferior wall angle between the surgical eye and healthy eye was also statistically significant between the groups. The average surgical duration in the 3-D group was substantially shorter than in the control group. Additionally, the postoperative clinical evaluation in the 3-D group was superior to that of the control group.
CONCLUSION: The 3-D printing technique is of great value for predicting the precise fracture zone before, and during, personalized surgery, and can help surgeons achieve accurate anatomical reconstruction for repairs of blowout orbital fractures. Moreover, the simulated bone template produced by 3-D printing models allows for "true-to-original" orbital reconstruction, which can shorten the surgical duration and improve the accuracy and safety of the operation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Artificial bone; Orbital blowout fracture; Personalized reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28786025     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-017-3766-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  18 in total

Review 1.  Orbital fractures: pathophysiology and implant materials for orbital reconstruction.

Authors:  E Bradley Strong
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 1.446

2.  Orbital Reconstruction: Patient-Specific Orbital Floor Reconstruction Using a Mirroring Technique and a Customized Titanium Mesh.

Authors:  Achille Tarsitano; Giovanni Badiali; Angelo Pizzigallo; Claudio Marchetti
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Clinical application of 3D pre-bent titanium implants for orbital floor fractures.

Authors:  Marcin Kozakiewicz; Marcin Elgalal; Piotr Loba; Piotr Komuński; Piotr Arkuszewski; Anna Broniarczyk-Loba; Ludomir Stefańczyk
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Complex midfacial reconstruction: a combined technique of computer-assisted surgery and microvascular tissue transfer.

Authors:  Horst Kokemueller; Frank Tavassol; Martin Rücker; Martin Ruecker; Nils-Claudius Gellrich
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Assessment of internal orbital reconstructions for pure blowout fractures: cranial bone grafts versus titanium mesh.

Authors:  Edward Ellis; Yinghui Tan
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  The application and progress of high-density porous polyethylene in the repair of orbital wall defect.

Authors:  Zhuyun Qian; Xianqun Fan
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  Mirror-Imaged Rapid Prototype Skull Model and Pre-Molded Synthetic Scaffold to Achieve Optimal Orbital Cavity Reconstruction.

Authors:  Sung Woo Park; Jong Woo Choi; Kyung S Koh; Tae Suk Oh
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Analysis of complications after surgical repair of orbital fractures.

Authors:  Matteo Brucoli; Francesco Arcuri; Roberta Cavenaghi; Arnaldo Benech
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  Reconstruction of Inferior Orbital Wall Fractures Using Bone Fragments.

Authors:  Jin Tae Kim; Soo-Hyang Lee
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  Comparison of conchal cartilage graft with nasal septal cartilage graft for reconstruction of orbital floor blowout fractures.

Authors:  Mohammad Bayat; Fatemeh Momen-Heravi; Omid Khalilzadeh; Zeeia Mirhosseni; Ali Sadeghi-Tari
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 1.651

View more
  10 in total

1.  Generation of customized orbital implant templates using 3-dimensional printing for orbital wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Sunah Kang; Jaeyoung Kwon; Chan Joo Ahn; Bita Esmaeli; Guk Bae Kim; Namkug Kim; Ho-Seok Sa
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Orbital reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the role of patient-specific implants.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kotecha; Ashley Ferro; Patrick Harrison; Kathleen Fan
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-05-20

3.  Methods and Applications of 3D Patient-Specific Virtual Reconstructions in Surgery.

Authors:  Jordan Fletcher
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 4.  3D Printing and Virtual Surgical Planning in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Adeeb Zoabi; Idan Redenski; Daniel Oren; Adi Kasem; Asaf Zigron; Shadi Daoud; Liad Moskovich; Fares Kablan; Samer Srouji
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 5.  Three-dimensional printing in ophthalmology and eye care: current applications and future developments.

Authors:  Yazan Fakhoury; Abdallah Ellabban; Usama Attia; Ahmed Sallam; Samer Elsherbiny
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-27

Review 6.  Application of Bioprinting in Ophthalmology.

Authors:  Yanfang Wang; Jiejie Wang; Ziyu Ji; Wei Yan; Hong Zhao; Wenhua Huang; Huan Liu
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2022-02-22

7.  Personalized Surgery Service in a Tertiary Hospital: A Method to Increase Effectiveness, Precision, Safety and Quality in Maxillofacial Surgery Using Custom-Made 3D Prostheses and Implants.

Authors:  Jorge Pamias-Romero; Joan Masnou-Pratdesaba; Manel Sáez-Barba; Alba de-Pablo-García-Cuenca; Sahyly Siurana-Montilva; Anna Sala-Cunill; Victòria Valls-Comamala; Rosa Pujol-Pina; Coro Bescós-Atín
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 8.  Dose reduction in CT imaging for facial bone trauma in adults: A narrative literature review.

Authors:  Tayla Hooper; Grace Eccles; Talia Milliken; Josephine R Mathieu-Burry; Warren Reed
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2019-02-01

Review 9.  Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction-An Overview.

Authors:  Victor A Vasile; Sinziana Istrate; Raluca C Iancu; Roxana M Piticescu; Laura M Cursaru; Leopold Schmetterer; Gerhard Garhöfer; Alina Popa Cherecheanu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 10.  3D Printing in Eye Care.

Authors:  Ryan D Larochelle; Scott E Mann; Cristos Ifantides
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2021-07-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.